Evaluating federated learning approaches for mammography under breast density heterogeneity.

IF 2.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-17 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.13.4.044504
Gonzalo Iñaki Quintana, Franco Martin Di Maria, Laurence Vancamberg
{"title":"Evaluating federated learning approaches for mammography under breast density heterogeneity.","authors":"Gonzalo Iñaki Quintana, Franco Martin Di Maria, Laurence Vancamberg","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.13.4.044504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast density is a key factor that influences mammography interpretation and is a major source of heterogeneity in multicenter datasets. Such heterogeneity poses challenges for collaborative machine learning across institutions, particularly in federated learning (FL). We aim to evaluate the impact of breast density-induced heterogeneity on FL for mammography image classification and to assess the robustness of common FL algorithms in realistic clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We conducted experiments on mammography datasets under two scenarios: (1) a strongly heterogeneous setting where each participating site contributed exclusively low- or high-density cases, based on the BI-RADS density score, and (2) a population-based setting simulating breast density distributions observed in White and Asian populations. For the strongly heterogeneous setting, we evaluated two configurations: one with two clients, where the cases were grouped as BI-RADS A-B and C-D, and one with four clients, where each site contained cases of a single BI-RADS density. We compared three FL methods (i.e., FedAvg, FedProx, and SCAFFOLD) against centralized training, local-only training, and naïve aggregation approaches, including model ensembling and weight averaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both scenarios, FL consistently achieved performance comparable to centralized training, whereas local models and naïve aggregation approaches underperformed in the presence of strong heterogeneity. Notably, FedAvg achieved accuracy on par with or exceeding centralized training, demonstrating resilience to breast density-induced data imbalance without requiring specialized heterogeneity mitigation algorithms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show that FL can effectively address breast density-related heterogeneity, supporting its feasibility for real-world mammography workflows. The demonstrated robustness of FedAvg underscores the potential for broad clinical deployment of FL, enabling collaborative model development while maintaining data privacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"13 4","pages":"044504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13481055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.13.4.044504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast density is a key factor that influences mammography interpretation and is a major source of heterogeneity in multicenter datasets. Such heterogeneity poses challenges for collaborative machine learning across institutions, particularly in federated learning (FL). We aim to evaluate the impact of breast density-induced heterogeneity on FL for mammography image classification and to assess the robustness of common FL algorithms in realistic clinical settings.

Approach: We conducted experiments on mammography datasets under two scenarios: (1) a strongly heterogeneous setting where each participating site contributed exclusively low- or high-density cases, based on the BI-RADS density score, and (2) a population-based setting simulating breast density distributions observed in White and Asian populations. For the strongly heterogeneous setting, we evaluated two configurations: one with two clients, where the cases were grouped as BI-RADS A-B and C-D, and one with four clients, where each site contained cases of a single BI-RADS density. We compared three FL methods (i.e., FedAvg, FedProx, and SCAFFOLD) against centralized training, local-only training, and naïve aggregation approaches, including model ensembling and weight averaging.

Results: Across both scenarios, FL consistently achieved performance comparable to centralized training, whereas local models and naïve aggregation approaches underperformed in the presence of strong heterogeneity. Notably, FedAvg achieved accuracy on par with or exceeding centralized training, demonstrating resilience to breast density-induced data imbalance without requiring specialized heterogeneity mitigation algorithms.

Conclusions: These findings show that FL can effectively address breast density-related heterogeneity, supporting its feasibility for real-world mammography workflows. The demonstrated robustness of FedAvg underscores the potential for broad clinical deployment of FL, enabling collaborative model development while maintaining data privacy.

评估乳腺密度异质性下乳腺x线摄影联合学习方法。
目的:乳腺密度是影响乳房x线摄影解释的关键因素,也是多中心数据集异质性的主要来源。这种异质性给跨机构的协作机器学习带来了挑战,特别是在联邦学习(FL)中。我们的目的是评估乳腺密度引起的异质性对乳腺x线摄影图像分类中FL的影响,并评估常见FL算法在现实临床环境中的鲁棒性。方法:我们在两种情况下对乳房x线摄影数据集进行了实验:(1)基于BI-RADS密度评分的强异质性环境,每个参与的地点都有低或高密度的病例;(2)基于人群的环境,模拟白人和亚洲人群中观察到的乳房密度分布。对于强异质性设置,我们评估了两种配置:一种有两个客户端,其中病例被分组为BI-RADS a - b和C-D,另一种有四个客户端,其中每个站点包含单一BI-RADS密度的病例。我们比较了三种FL方法(即fedag, FedProx和SCAFFOLD)与集中训练,局部训练和naïve聚合方法(包括模型集成和权重平均)的对比。结果:在这两种情况下,FL始终达到与集中式训练相当的性能,而局部模型和naïve聚合方法在存在强异质性的情况下表现不佳。值得注意的是,fedag达到了与集中式训练相当或超过集中式训练的准确性,证明了在不需要专门的异质性缓解算法的情况下,对乳房密度引起的数据不平衡的恢复能力。结论:这些发现表明FL可以有效地解决乳腺密度相关的异质性,支持其在现实乳房x线摄影工作流程中的可行性。fedag的健壮性证明了FL在广泛临床应用的潜力,在保持数据隐私的同时实现了协作模型开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书