{"title":"Osteotomy Techniques in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Three-Decade Comparative Cohort Study.","authors":"Karl El Mendelek, Amjad Damaj, Jihad El Khoury","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established surgical procedure used to restore lacrimal drainage in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Various instrumentation techniques have been used for lacrimal bone osteotomy; however, their comparative effectiveness remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR performed using four different instrumentation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study included 360 consecutive endoscopic DCR procedures performed on 312 adult patients between 1995 and 2024 in a tertiary care center. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Osteotomy was performed using a drill, microdebrider, Kerrison punch, or thulium:YAG laser. Surgical success was defined as resolution of symptoms and confirmation of a patent neo-ostium on follow-up. Comparative statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in success rates among techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate was 95.3%. Success rates were comparable across all instrumentation techniques, with no statistically significant difference observed between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.99). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 2.8% of procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic DCR demonstrated high success rates across all instrumentation modalities. Surgical outcome appears to depend more on surgical technique and experience than on the specific instrument used for osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"11 4","pages":"e70548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13498750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established surgical procedure used to restore lacrimal drainage in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Various instrumentation techniques have been used for lacrimal bone osteotomy; however, their comparative effectiveness remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR performed using four different instrumentation techniques.
Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 360 consecutive endoscopic DCR procedures performed on 312 adult patients between 1995 and 2024 in a tertiary care center. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Osteotomy was performed using a drill, microdebrider, Kerrison punch, or thulium:YAG laser. Surgical success was defined as resolution of symptoms and confirmation of a patent neo-ostium on follow-up. Comparative statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in success rates among techniques.
Results: The overall success rate was 95.3%. Success rates were comparable across all instrumentation techniques, with no statistically significant difference observed between groups (p = 0.99). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 2.8% of procedures.
Conclusion: Endoscopic DCR demonstrated high success rates across all instrumentation modalities. Surgical outcome appears to depend more on surgical technique and experience than on the specific instrument used for osteotomy.