Osteotomy Techniques in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Three-Decade Comparative Cohort Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2026-08-21 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70548
Karl El Mendelek, Amjad Damaj, Jihad El Khoury
{"title":"Osteotomy Techniques in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Three-Decade Comparative Cohort Study.","authors":"Karl El Mendelek, Amjad Damaj, Jihad El Khoury","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established surgical procedure used to restore lacrimal drainage in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Various instrumentation techniques have been used for lacrimal bone osteotomy; however, their comparative effectiveness remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR performed using four different instrumentation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study included 360 consecutive endoscopic DCR procedures performed on 312 adult patients between 1995 and 2024 in a tertiary care center. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Osteotomy was performed using a drill, microdebrider, Kerrison punch, or thulium:YAG laser. Surgical success was defined as resolution of symptoms and confirmation of a patent neo-ostium on follow-up. Comparative statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in success rates among techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate was 95.3%. Success rates were comparable across all instrumentation techniques, with no statistically significant difference observed between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.99). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 2.8% of procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic DCR demonstrated high success rates across all instrumentation modalities. Surgical outcome appears to depend more on surgical technique and experience than on the specific instrument used for osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"11 4","pages":"e70548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13498750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established surgical procedure used to restore lacrimal drainage in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Various instrumentation techniques have been used for lacrimal bone osteotomy; however, their comparative effectiveness remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR performed using four different instrumentation techniques.

Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 360 consecutive endoscopic DCR procedures performed on 312 adult patients between 1995 and 2024 in a tertiary care center. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Osteotomy was performed using a drill, microdebrider, Kerrison punch, or thulium:YAG laser. Surgical success was defined as resolution of symptoms and confirmation of a patent neo-ostium on follow-up. Comparative statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in success rates among techniques.

Results: The overall success rate was 95.3%. Success rates were comparable across all instrumentation techniques, with no statistically significant difference observed between groups (p = 0.99). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 2.8% of procedures.

Conclusion: Endoscopic DCR demonstrated high success rates across all instrumentation modalities. Surgical outcome appears to depend more on surgical technique and experience than on the specific instrument used for osteotomy.

内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术中的截骨技术:一项30年的比较队列研究。
目的:内镜下泪囊鼻腔造瘘术(DCR)是一种完善的手术方法,用于恢复鼻泪管阻塞患者的泪道引流。各种器械技术已被用于泪骨截骨术;然而,它们的相对有效性仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估使用四种不同仪器技术进行内窥镜DCR的手术效果。方法:这项回顾性比较队列研究包括1995年至2024年间在三级保健中心对312名成年患者进行360次连续内镜下DCR手术。所有手术均由一名外科医生完成。截骨采用钻头、微清创器、Kerrison冲床或铥:YAG激光进行。手术成功的定义是症状的缓解和随访时确认新口未闭。通过比较统计分析,评价不同技术的成功率差异。结果:总成功率95.3%。所有仪器技术的成功率具有可比性,组间无统计学差异(p = 0.99)。2.8%的手术发生了轻微的术后并发症。结论:内镜下DCR在所有仪器方式中都显示出很高的成功率。手术结果似乎更多地取决于手术技术和经验,而不是用于截骨的特定器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书