The Impact of Covid-19 on Various Offerings Within a Worksite Wellness Program.

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marilyn S Nehls, Adrianne N Caudill, David W Fardo, Carrie D Davidson, Martha C Riddell, Richard C Ingram
{"title":"The Impact of Covid-19 on Various Offerings Within a Worksite Wellness Program.","authors":"Marilyn S Nehls, Adrianne N Caudill, David W Fardo, Carrie D Davidson, Martha C Riddell, Richard C Ingram","doi":"10.1177/15248399261477409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worksite wellness programs are popular employer offerings as of the last few decades. The COVID-19 pandemic caused major shifts in behavior since these programs were implemented. The purpose of this study was to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic affected participation in a worksite wellness program. This study is a secondary analysis of a university worksite wellness program that compared monthly participation in 2019 (pre-pandemic) versus 2020 (after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic). The main outcome measures included participation within two offerings (single-visit or ongoing programming) for each of the three arms (MoveWell, EatWell, and BeWell) of the worksite wellness program. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test for data normality, paired <i>t</i>-tests for year-to-year differences in overall participation, and Wald confidence intervals for year-to-year differences in specific offerings. Overall, participation in the worksite wellness program decreased during the pandemic when compared with participation of the previous year (<i>p</i> = .016). Participation in the BeWell and EatWell offerings had no significant change from 2019 to 2020. Among the MoveWell offerings, the group fitness classes (ongoing programming) were the only worksite wellness offering that showed decreased participation. Predictably, overall participation in a worksite wellness program decreased while employees were not physically in their workplace. However, it is noteworthy during the pandemic that employees were still participating in EatWell and BeWell programming such that participation was not significantly different from 2019. The results from this study could potentially be used to inform worksite wellness programming in future pandemics or other public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399261477409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399261477409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worksite wellness programs are popular employer offerings as of the last few decades. The COVID-19 pandemic caused major shifts in behavior since these programs were implemented. The purpose of this study was to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic affected participation in a worksite wellness program. This study is a secondary analysis of a university worksite wellness program that compared monthly participation in 2019 (pre-pandemic) versus 2020 (after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic). The main outcome measures included participation within two offerings (single-visit or ongoing programming) for each of the three arms (MoveWell, EatWell, and BeWell) of the worksite wellness program. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test for data normality, paired t-tests for year-to-year differences in overall participation, and Wald confidence intervals for year-to-year differences in specific offerings. Overall, participation in the worksite wellness program decreased during the pandemic when compared with participation of the previous year (p = .016). Participation in the BeWell and EatWell offerings had no significant change from 2019 to 2020. Among the MoveWell offerings, the group fitness classes (ongoing programming) were the only worksite wellness offering that showed decreased participation. Predictably, overall participation in a worksite wellness program decreased while employees were not physically in their workplace. However, it is noteworthy during the pandemic that employees were still participating in EatWell and BeWell programming such that participation was not significantly different from 2019. The results from this study could potentially be used to inform worksite wellness programming in future pandemics or other public health emergencies.

Covid-19对工作场所健康计划中各种产品的影响。
在过去的几十年里,工作场所健康计划是很受雇主欢迎的。自这些计划实施以来,COVID-19大流行导致了行为的重大转变。本研究的目的是了解COVID-19大流行如何影响工作场所健康计划的参与。这项研究是对一项大学工作场所健康计划的二次分析,该计划比较了2019年(大流行前)和2020年(新冠肺炎大流行爆发后)的每月参与情况。主要的结果测量包括参与工作场所健康计划的三个分支(MoveWell, EatWell和BeWell)的两个项目(单次访问或持续项目)。统计分析包括对数据正态性的夏皮罗-威尔克检验,对总体参与的年度差异的配对t检验,以及对特定产品的年度差异的Wald置信区间。总体而言,与前一年的参与率相比,大流行期间工作场所健康计划的参与率有所下降(p = 0.016)。从2019年到2020年,BeWell和EatWell产品的参与情况没有显著变化。在MoveWell提供的项目中,团体健身课程(正在进行的项目)是唯一一个参与率下降的工作场所健康项目。可以预见的是,当员工不在工作场所时,参与工作场所健康计划的总体人数会减少。然而,值得注意的是,在疫情期间,员工仍在参与EatWell和BeWell的编程,因此参与程度与2019年没有显着差异。这项研究的结果可能用于未来流行病或其他公共卫生紧急情况下的工作场所健康规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书