Healthcare Resilience Should Include the Worker-Patient Safety Loop: A Taiwan Psychiatric Hospital Perspective.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lien-Chung Wei, Chun-Hung Lee
{"title":"Healthcare Resilience Should Include the Worker-Patient Safety Loop: A Taiwan Psychiatric Hospital Perspective.","authors":"Lien-Chung Wei, Chun-Hung Lee","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research before and during COVID-19 has framed health-system resilience as the capacity to absorb shocks, adapt, transform and learn while sustaining essential functions. Building on this broader literature, including Meredith et al.'s account of local public-health adaptation under political and resource constraints, we propose a worker-patient safety loop from a Taiwan psychiatric hospital perspective: workforce strain can weaken safety-critical care; near misses, adverse events and continuity failures should trigger reporting, organisational learning and corrective action; and the resulting changes should protect workers, patients and care continuity. The loop can be monitored through indicators of workforce wellbeing and safety, safety-event learning, and continuity across settings, supported by digital incident, staffing and handoff systems with safeguards for privacy and data quality. Informed by professional experience and published evidence, this conceptual framework applies to acute shocks and continuing operational pressures. Its proposed domains require prospective empirical validation before they can be treated as established measures of hospital resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research before and during COVID-19 has framed health-system resilience as the capacity to absorb shocks, adapt, transform and learn while sustaining essential functions. Building on this broader literature, including Meredith et al.'s account of local public-health adaptation under political and resource constraints, we propose a worker-patient safety loop from a Taiwan psychiatric hospital perspective: workforce strain can weaken safety-critical care; near misses, adverse events and continuity failures should trigger reporting, organisational learning and corrective action; and the resulting changes should protect workers, patients and care continuity. The loop can be monitored through indicators of workforce wellbeing and safety, safety-event learning, and continuity across settings, supported by digital incident, staffing and handoff systems with safeguards for privacy and data quality. Informed by professional experience and published evidence, this conceptual framework applies to acute shocks and continuing operational pressures. Its proposed domains require prospective empirical validation before they can be treated as established measures of hospital resilience.

医疗弹性应包括工患安全环:台湾精神病院视角。
在2019冠状病毒病之前和期间的研究将卫生系统复原力定义为在维持基本功能的同时吸收冲击、适应、转型和学习的能力。基于这一更广泛的文献,包括Meredith等人对政治和资源约束下当地公共卫生适应的描述,我们从台湾精神病院的角度提出了一个工人-患者安全循环:劳动力紧张会削弱安全关键护理;未遂事件、不良事件和连续性失败应触发报告、组织学习和纠正措施;由此产生的变化应能保护工作人员、患者和护理的连续性。该循环可以通过员工福利和安全指标、安全事件学习和跨设置的连续性来监控,并由具有隐私和数据质量保障的数字事件、人员配备和移交系统提供支持。根据专业经验和已发表的证据,这一概念框架适用于急性冲击和持续的业务压力。其提出的领域需要前瞻性的经验验证,然后才能将其视为医院恢复力的既定措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书