The Impact of Group Reflection on Preventive Behaviors for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Among ICU Nurses.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2026-07-16 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_259_25
Mohadese Habibollahi, Mahdi B Moghaddam, Farid Zand, Mehrsa Basiri Moghadam
{"title":"The Impact of Group Reflection on Preventive Behaviors for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Among ICU Nurses.","authors":"Mohadese Habibollahi, Mahdi B Moghaddam, Farid Zand, Mehrsa Basiri Moghadam","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_259_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reflection is a fundamental component of nursing education and professional practice. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of structured group reflection sessions on ICU nurses' adherence to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) prevention practices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This quasiexperimental study a total of 44 ICU nurses from Namazi Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, participated. Two ICUs were randomly selected. The intervention consisted of four group reflection sessions, each comprising 7-8 participants, conducted over 2 weeks and guided by VAP prevention protocols. Nurses' performance was assessed before the intervention and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks afterward using the Behesht Aeen checklist. Data were analyzed using SPSS v. 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that the intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement and an upward trajectory in all dimensions of nurses' performance across the postintervention follow-up periods (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In sharp contrast, the control group's performance remained stable across all time points (<i>p</i> > 0.05) for all dimensions, with the sole exception being endotracheal tube protection. One week after the intervention, the control group scored 18.13 (5.30), whereas the intervention group scored 28.59 (1.65) (t<sub>42</sub>= -12.64, <i>p</i> < 0.001(. This divergence was maintained at 4 weeks, with scores of 17.22 (3.71) for the control group and 30.00 (1.77) for the intervention group (U<sub>42</sub> = 00.00, <i>p</i> < 0.001(. At eight weeks later, the scores were 15.86 (3.94) for the control group and 29.31 (1.49) for the intervention group (U<sub>42</sub> = 00.00, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that structured group reflection sessions are an effective educational strategy to enhance ICU nurses' preventive behaviors for VAP, thereby improving clinical performance and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":"31 4","pages":"685-690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13481045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_259_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reflection is a fundamental component of nursing education and professional practice. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of structured group reflection sessions on ICU nurses' adherence to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) prevention practices.

Materials and methods: This quasiexperimental study a total of 44 ICU nurses from Namazi Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, participated. Two ICUs were randomly selected. The intervention consisted of four group reflection sessions, each comprising 7-8 participants, conducted over 2 weeks and guided by VAP prevention protocols. Nurses' performance was assessed before the intervention and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks afterward using the Behesht Aeen checklist. Data were analyzed using SPSS v. 16.

Results: The findings revealed that the intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement and an upward trajectory in all dimensions of nurses' performance across the postintervention follow-up periods (p < 0.001). In sharp contrast, the control group's performance remained stable across all time points (p > 0.05) for all dimensions, with the sole exception being endotracheal tube protection. One week after the intervention, the control group scored 18.13 (5.30), whereas the intervention group scored 28.59 (1.65) (t42= -12.64, p < 0.001(. This divergence was maintained at 4 weeks, with scores of 17.22 (3.71) for the control group and 30.00 (1.77) for the intervention group (U42 = 00.00, p < 0.001(. At eight weeks later, the scores were 15.86 (3.94) for the control group and 29.31 (1.49) for the intervention group (U42 = 00.00, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The findings indicate that structured group reflection sessions are an effective educational strategy to enhance ICU nurses' preventive behaviors for VAP, thereby improving clinical performance and quality of care.

小组反思对ICU护士呼吸机相关性肺炎预防行为的影响
背景:反思是护理教育和专业实践的基本组成部分。本研究旨在评估结构化小组反思会议对ICU护士遵守呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)预防措施的影响。材料与方法:本拟实验研究共选取44名来自伊朗设拉子Namazi医院的ICU护士。随机选择2个icu。干预包括四个小组反思会议,每个会议由7-8名参与者组成,在VAP预防协议的指导下进行了2周。在干预前和干预后1、4、8周使用Behesht Aeen检查表评估护士的表现。数据采用SPSS v. 16进行分析。结果:研究结果显示,干预组在干预后随访期间,护士的各维度表现均有显著改善和上升趋势(p < 0.001)。与此形成鲜明对比的是,对照组在所有维度上的表现在所有时间点上都保持稳定(p > 0.05),唯一例外是气管内管保护。干预后1周,对照组得分为18.13分(5.30分),干预组得分为28.59分(1.65分)(t42= -12.64, p < 0.001)。这种差异在4周时保持不变,对照组得分为17.22(3.71)分,干预组得分为30.00(1.77)分(U42 = 00.00, p < 0.001)。8周后,对照组得分为15.86分(3.94分),干预组得分为29.31分(1.49分)(U42 = 00.00, p < 0.01)。结论:有组织的小组反思是一种有效的教育策略,可以提高ICU护士对VAP的预防行为,从而提高临床表现和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书