Nursing Process Documentation and Use of Standardized Nursing Terminology (NANDA-I, NOC, NIC) in Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 2.9 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608261478229
Maryam Varzeshnejad, Zohreh Nabizadeh Gharghozar, Aydin Feyzi, Manijeh Nourian, Leila Valizadeh
{"title":"Nursing Process Documentation and Use of Standardized Nursing Terminology (NANDA-I, NOC, NIC) in Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Maryam Varzeshnejad, Zohreh Nabizadeh Gharghozar, Aydin Feyzi, Manijeh Nourian, Leila Valizadeh","doi":"10.1177/23779608261478229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The nursing process (NP) is a framework for planning and documenting nursing care. Standardized nursing language (SNL), including NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, supports consistent documentation and demonstrates nursing contributions to patient outcomes. Understanding students' use of NP and SNL is important for improving nursing education and care quality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the quality of undergraduate nursing students' NP documentation, including the use of NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, and explored perceived barriers to implementing NP and SNL in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in 2024 at a Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. In the quantitative phase, NP documentation in Pediatric Nursing clinical logbooks, completed after a 17-hour case-based course on NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, was evaluated using a researcher-developed checklist. Nursing diagnoses were classified according to NANDA-I Taxonomy II domains, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 29. In the qualitative phase, purposively selected students participated in semi-structured interviews to explain the quantitative findings. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 clinical logbooks were analyzed. The mean NP documentation score was 3.52 ± 1.05 (out of 5). Students performed best in documenting NIC interventions and lowest in documenting NANDA-I diagnoses and NOC outcomes. Among 633 documented diagnoses, Safety/Protection, Elimination and Exchange, and Nutrition were the most frequent domains, whereas Self-Perception was least represented; no diagnoses were recorded in the Sexuality, Life Principles, or Growth and Development domains. Eighteen students participated in interviews, yielding two themes: education-related and student-related barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students demonstrated greater proficiency in documenting interventions than in formulating standardized diagnoses and outcomes. The predominance of physiological diagnoses suggests limitations in comprehensive assessment. Strengthening diagnostic and outcome reasoning and promoting holistic NP-based care should be emphasized in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"23779608261478229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261478229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The nursing process (NP) is a framework for planning and documenting nursing care. Standardized nursing language (SNL), including NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, supports consistent documentation and demonstrates nursing contributions to patient outcomes. Understanding students' use of NP and SNL is important for improving nursing education and care quality.

Objectives: This study evaluated the quality of undergraduate nursing students' NP documentation, including the use of NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, and explored perceived barriers to implementing NP and SNL in clinical practice.

Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in 2024 at a Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. In the quantitative phase, NP documentation in Pediatric Nursing clinical logbooks, completed after a 17-hour case-based course on NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, was evaluated using a researcher-developed checklist. Nursing diagnoses were classified according to NANDA-I Taxonomy II domains, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 29. In the qualitative phase, purposively selected students participated in semi-structured interviews to explain the quantitative findings. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach.

Results: A total of 121 clinical logbooks were analyzed. The mean NP documentation score was 3.52 ± 1.05 (out of 5). Students performed best in documenting NIC interventions and lowest in documenting NANDA-I diagnoses and NOC outcomes. Among 633 documented diagnoses, Safety/Protection, Elimination and Exchange, and Nutrition were the most frequent domains, whereas Self-Perception was least represented; no diagnoses were recorded in the Sexuality, Life Principles, or Growth and Development domains. Eighteen students participated in interviews, yielding two themes: education-related and student-related barriers.

Conclusion: Students demonstrated greater proficiency in documenting interventions than in formulating standardized diagnoses and outcomes. The predominance of physiological diagnoses suggests limitations in comprehensive assessment. Strengthening diagnostic and outcome reasoning and promoting holistic NP-based care should be emphasized in nursing education.

护理过程文件和标准化护理术语(NANDA-I, NOC, NIC)在本科护理学生中的使用:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。
护理过程(NP)是一个规划和记录护理的框架。标准化护理语言(SNL),包括NANDA-I、NOC和NIC,支持一致的文件记录,并证明护理对患者预后的贡献。了解学生NP和SNL的使用情况对提高护理教育水平和护理质量具有重要意义。目的:本研究评估本科护生NP文件的质量,包括NANDA-I、NOC和NIC的使用,并探讨在临床实践中实施NP和SNL的感知障碍。方法:本解释性顺序混合方法研究于2024年在护理和助产学院进行。在定量阶段,儿科护理临床日志中的NP文件,在经过17小时的NANDA-I, NOC和NIC案例课程后完成,使用研究人员开发的检查表进行评估。护理诊断按照NANDA-I Taxonomy II域进行分类,数据采用SPSS version 29描述性统计软件进行分析。在定性阶段,有目的地选择学生参加半结构化访谈,以解释定量结果。数据分析采用基于Graneheim和Lundman方法的传统内容分析。结果:共分析121份临床日志。NP记录的平均得分为3.52±1.05分(满分5分)。学生在记录NIC干预方面表现最好,在记录NANDA-I诊断和NOC结果方面表现最差。在633个记录的诊断中,安全/保护、消除和交换和营养是最常见的领域,而自我感知是最不具代表性的;在性、生命原则或生长发育领域没有诊断记录。18名学生参加了访谈,产生了两个主题:与教育有关的障碍和与学生有关的障碍。结论:学生在记录干预措施方面比在制定标准化诊断和结果方面表现出更高的熟练程度。生理诊断的优势提示综合评估的局限性。在护理教育中应强调加强诊断和结果推理,促进以np为基础的整体护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书