Children's and parents' use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment: a scoping review.

IF 6.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-25-00511
Tracey O'Neill, Karen McTague, Thelma Begley, Sonam Banka-Cullen, Eleanor Hollywood
{"title":"Children's and parents' use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment: a scoping review.","authors":"Tracey O'Neill, Karen McTague, Thelma Begley, Sonam Banka-Cullen, Eleanor Hollywood","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map the evidence on the use of diabetes technologies by primary school children (aged 6 to 12 years) with type 1 diabetes and their parents in primary school settings. Specifically, it aimed to identify the types of technologies used, who is responsible for managing and supporting their use, and the benefits and challenges associated with their use during the school day.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Technological advances in diabetes care have revolutionized the management of diabetes, but their integration into school settings introduces new challenges for children, parents, and school staff. Evidence about their use during the primary school day remains fragmented.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies, as well as systematic reviews, that included children aged 6 to 12 years or their parents and focused on the use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment were eligible for inclusion. Gray literature was also considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search for relevant records was conducted in April 2025 across CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase (Embase.com), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. Gray and unpublished literature were searched in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened titles, and abstracts, and full-text sources. The findings are presented in tables, accompanied by a basic content analysis and a descriptive narrative summary based on the review questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included in this review: 15 qualitative studies, 4 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Studies were conducted in multiple countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Canada, Poland, Belgium, and Turkey. There were also 2 multicountry sources. Publication years ranged from 2004 to 2025. Results from child and parent reports showed that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion devices, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring, and hybrid closed-loop systems are being used by children in the primary school environment. These technologies are managed during the school day through a collaborative approach, involving the children, their parents, and various school personnel. The benefits of using diabetes technology in the primary school environment were identified across 4 main categories: i) improved school participation, academic engagement, and social-emotional well-being; ii) increased independence, confidence, and self-management; iii) enhanced safety and monitoring; and iv) reduced burden on parents and school staff. The challenges were identified across 4 categories: i) device-related challenges; ii) social stigma and peer interaction ; iii) school personnel competency and training; and iv) parental stress and family.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review offers insights into the use of diabetes technology during the primary school day from the perspectives of children and their parents. It highlights that diabetes technology can support children's inclusion, autonomy, and confidence during school. It also highlights the need for structured training for school personnel, clear role delineation, and supportive school policies to ensure the safe and sustainable use of technology.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/fhw3x.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2057-2104"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13649272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the evidence on the use of diabetes technologies by primary school children (aged 6 to 12 years) with type 1 diabetes and their parents in primary school settings. Specifically, it aimed to identify the types of technologies used, who is responsible for managing and supporting their use, and the benefits and challenges associated with their use during the school day.

Introduction: Technological advances in diabetes care have revolutionized the management of diabetes, but their integration into school settings introduces new challenges for children, parents, and school staff. Evidence about their use during the primary school day remains fragmented.

Eligibility criteria: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies, as well as systematic reviews, that included children aged 6 to 12 years or their parents and focused on the use of diabetes technologies in the primary school environment were eligible for inclusion. Gray literature was also considered.

Methods: A search for relevant records was conducted in April 2025 across CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase (Embase.com), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. Gray and unpublished literature were searched in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened titles, and abstracts, and full-text sources. The findings are presented in tables, accompanied by a basic content analysis and a descriptive narrative summary based on the review questions.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included in this review: 15 qualitative studies, 4 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Studies were conducted in multiple countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Canada, Poland, Belgium, and Turkey. There were also 2 multicountry sources. Publication years ranged from 2004 to 2025. Results from child and parent reports showed that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion devices, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring, and hybrid closed-loop systems are being used by children in the primary school environment. These technologies are managed during the school day through a collaborative approach, involving the children, their parents, and various school personnel. The benefits of using diabetes technology in the primary school environment were identified across 4 main categories: i) improved school participation, academic engagement, and social-emotional well-being; ii) increased independence, confidence, and self-management; iii) enhanced safety and monitoring; and iv) reduced burden on parents and school staff. The challenges were identified across 4 categories: i) device-related challenges; ii) social stigma and peer interaction ; iii) school personnel competency and training; and iv) parental stress and family.

Conclusions: This scoping review offers insights into the use of diabetes technology during the primary school day from the perspectives of children and their parents. It highlights that diabetes technology can support children's inclusion, autonomy, and confidence during school. It also highlights the need for structured training for school personnel, clear role delineation, and supportive school policies to ensure the safe and sustainable use of technology.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/fhw3x.

儿童和家长在小学环境中使用糖尿病技术:范围审查。
目的:本综述旨在绘制1型糖尿病小学生(6至12岁)及其家长在小学环境中使用糖尿病技术的证据图谱。具体来说,它旨在确定所使用的技术类型,谁负责管理和支持它们的使用,以及在上学期间使用它们的好处和挑战。导论:糖尿病护理的技术进步已经彻底改变了糖尿病的管理,但它们与学校环境的融合给儿童、家长和学校工作人员带来了新的挑战。关于它们在小学期间使用的证据仍然支离破碎。入选标准:定性、定量和混合方法研究,以及系统评价,包括6至12岁儿童和/或其父母,重点关注小学环境中糖尿病技术的使用,符合入选条件。灰色文献也被考虑在内。不包括糖尿病技术、小学学龄儿童和/或其父母或小学环境的研究被排除在外。方法:检索2025年4月在CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost)、Embase.com、MEDLINE (EBSCOhost)、Web of Science Core Collection和谷歌Scholar上的相关记录。灰色和未发表的文献在ProQuest dissertation and Theses Global和谷歌Scholar中检索。两名独立审稿人筛选了标题、摘要和全文来源。调查结果以表格形式提出,并附有基本内容分析和基于审查问题的描述性叙述摘要。结果:本综述共纳入23项研究:15项定性研究,4项定量研究,4项混合方法研究。研究在多个国家进行,包括英国、美国、澳大利亚、新西兰、丹麦、加拿大、波兰、比利时和土耳其。还有2个多国来源。出版年份从2004年到2025年不等。来自儿童和家长报告的结果显示,持续皮下胰岛素输注装置、连续血糖监测、快速血糖监测和混合闭环系统正在小学环境中被儿童使用。这些技术是通过一种协作的方式在上学期间进行管理的,涉及儿童、他们的父母和各种学校工作人员。在小学环境中使用糖尿病技术的好处被确定为4个主要类别:i)改善学校参与和学术参与以及社会情感健康;Ii)增强独立性、自信心和自我管理能力;Iii)加强安全和监测;减轻了家长和学校工作人员的负担。挑战分为4类:i)与设备相关的挑战;Ii)社会污名化和同伴互动挑战;Iii)学校人员能力和培训挑战;4)父母压力和家庭挑战。结论:本综述从儿童及其父母的角度对小学期间糖尿病技术的使用提供了见解。它强调糖尿病技术可以支持儿童在学校的融入、自主和自信。它还强调需要对学校人员进行有组织的培训、明确的角色界定和支持性的学校政策,以确保安全、可持续地使用技术。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/fhw3x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书