Benchmarking Australian Dental Weighted Activity Units against public and private dental fee schedules: a cross-sectional item-code comparator study.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jonathon Oddy, William Ha
{"title":"Benchmarking Australian Dental Weighted Activity Units against public and private dental fee schedules: a cross-sectional item-code comparator study.","authors":"Jonathon Oddy, William Ha","doi":"10.1038/s41405-026-00479-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To benchmark Dental Weighted Activity Units (DWAUs) against Australian dental remuneration schedules and derive suggested recalibration factors for endodontics, periodontics and prosthodontics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional item-code comparator study linked Australian Dental Association item codes to DWAU values and fees from public and private schedules, standardised to 1 January 2025 Australian dollars. The primary outcome was grouped DWAU per dollar, calculated as the sum of DWAUs divided by the sum of fees and expressed as DWAU per $1000. Lower values indicated fewer DWAUs credited per dollar of remuneration. Merged general and merged specialist fee series were constructed, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and suggested stream-specific calibration factors estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 343 item codes, 264 had DWAU values greater than zero and 260 were included. Overall DWAU per $1000 was 1.589 for merged general comparators and 1.130 for merged specialist comparators. Under specialist comparators, endodontics had the lowest value at 0.945 DWAU per $1000, 16.40% below the benchmark. The suggested specialist calibration factor for endodontics was 1.196.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings indicate that current DWAU values are not uniformly aligned with remuneration signals, particularly for specialist endodontics, and supports stream-specific review rather than a single uniform adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cross-schedule benchmarking and specialist-adjusted DWAU rates may improve public dental activity measurement, commissioning and specialist service planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13486687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00479-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To benchmark Dental Weighted Activity Units (DWAUs) against Australian dental remuneration schedules and derive suggested recalibration factors for endodontics, periodontics and prosthodontics.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional item-code comparator study linked Australian Dental Association item codes to DWAU values and fees from public and private schedules, standardised to 1 January 2025 Australian dollars. The primary outcome was grouped DWAU per dollar, calculated as the sum of DWAUs divided by the sum of fees and expressed as DWAU per $1000. Lower values indicated fewer DWAUs credited per dollar of remuneration. Merged general and merged specialist fee series were constructed, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and suggested stream-specific calibration factors estimated.

Results: Of 343 item codes, 264 had DWAU values greater than zero and 260 were included. Overall DWAU per $1000 was 1.589 for merged general comparators and 1.130 for merged specialist comparators. Under specialist comparators, endodontics had the lowest value at 0.945 DWAU per $1000, 16.40% below the benchmark. The suggested specialist calibration factor for endodontics was 1.196.

Discussion: The findings indicate that current DWAU values are not uniformly aligned with remuneration signals, particularly for specialist endodontics, and supports stream-specific review rather than a single uniform adjustment.

Conclusions: Cross-schedule benchmarking and specialist-adjusted DWAU rates may improve public dental activity measurement, commissioning and specialist service planning.

基准澳大利亚牙科加权活动单位对公共和私人牙科收费时间表:横断面项目代码比较研究。
目的:将牙科加权活动单位(DWAUs)与澳大利亚牙科薪酬表进行比较,并得出牙髓学、牙周学和修复学的建议重新校准因子。材料和方法:一项横断面项目代码比较研究将澳大利亚牙科协会项目代码与DWAU值和公共和私人时间表的费用联系起来,标准化到2025年1月1日澳元。主要结果分组为每美元的DWAU,计算为DWAU总和除以费用总和,并表示为每1000美元的DWAU。较低的数值表示每一美元报酬记入的劳动报酬单位较少。合并的普通和合并的专科费用序列构建,bootstrap 95%置信区间和建议的特定流校准因子估计。结果:343个商品编码中,DWAU值大于零的有264个,其中260个被收录。合并后的一般比较机构每1000美元的总耗用时间为1.589美元,合并后的专家比较机构为1.130美元。在专科比较指标下,牙髓学的价值最低,为每1000元0.945元澳元,较基准低16.40%。牙髓学专科校正因子建议为1.196。讨论:研究结果表明,目前的DWAU值与薪酬信号并不一致,特别是对于专科牙髓学,并且支持特定流的审查,而不是单一的统一调整。结论:交叉时间表基准和专家调整的DWAU率可以改善公共牙科活动的测量、调试和专家服务计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书