Which Bonding Protocol Provides the Most Durable Zirconia Adhesion after In Vitro Artificial Aging: A Systematic Review.

Q3 Dentistry
Linda Ayedi, Zeineb Riahi, Imen Kalghoum, Oumaima Mejri, Dalenda Hadyaoui
{"title":"Which Bonding Protocol Provides the Most Durable Zirconia Adhesion after <i>In Vitro</i> Artificial Aging: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Linda Ayedi, Zeineb Riahi, Imen Kalghoum, Oumaima Mejri, Dalenda Hadyaoui","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare various bonding protocols and zirconia surface treatments to identify the most effective method for achieving strong and durable bonding with resin luting cements after aging protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, via Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Science Direct databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, synonyms, and combinations of the keywords \"dental bonding,\" \"zirconium oxide,\" \"shear strength,\" \"yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia,\" and \"longevity,\" using Boolean operators (\"AND\" and \"OR\") applied to refine results. The included studies were identified based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria established prior to the review process. In order to obtain recent results, only articles published after 2014 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 714 records, of which 15 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included after screening and full-text review. Data such as type of zirconia, surface pretreatment, assembly material, bond strength obtained, and aging were extracted and listed in different tables. Risk of bias assessment with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool showed that 75% of the included studies presented a low risk and 25% a moderate risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our findings, air-particle abrasion (APA) represents the most effective pretreatment strategy, particularly when combined with the application of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) primer and a self-adhesive resin cement, resulting in durable and reliable bonding to zirconia.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The core objective of prosthetic treatment is to ensure the long-term success of zirconia restorations, which largely depends on the bonding protocol selected by the clinician. According to this review, the most effective approach is airborne-particle abrasion (APA) combined with 10-MDP-containing primers or universal adhesives, as this protocol provides durable and reliable adhesion to zirconia. How to cite this article: Ayedi L, Riahi Z, Kalghoum I, <i>et al</i>. Which Bonding Protocol Provides the Most Durable Zirconia Adhesion after <i>In Vitro</i> Artificial Aging: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1215-1227.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 12","pages":"1215-1227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare various bonding protocols and zirconia surface treatments to identify the most effective method for achieving strong and durable bonding with resin luting cements after aging protocols.

Materials and methods: The research was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, via Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Science Direct databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, synonyms, and combinations of the keywords "dental bonding," "zirconium oxide," "shear strength," "yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia," and "longevity," using Boolean operators ("AND" and "OR") applied to refine results. The included studies were identified based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria established prior to the review process. In order to obtain recent results, only articles published after 2014 were included.

Results: The search yielded 714 records, of which 15 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included after screening and full-text review. Data such as type of zirconia, surface pretreatment, assembly material, bond strength obtained, and aging were extracted and listed in different tables. Risk of bias assessment with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool showed that 75% of the included studies presented a low risk and 25% a moderate risk.

Conclusion: According to our findings, air-particle abrasion (APA) represents the most effective pretreatment strategy, particularly when combined with the application of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) primer and a self-adhesive resin cement, resulting in durable and reliable bonding to zirconia.

Clinical significance: The core objective of prosthetic treatment is to ensure the long-term success of zirconia restorations, which largely depends on the bonding protocol selected by the clinician. According to this review, the most effective approach is airborne-particle abrasion (APA) combined with 10-MDP-containing primers or universal adhesives, as this protocol provides durable and reliable adhesion to zirconia. How to cite this article: Ayedi L, Riahi Z, Kalghoum I, et al. Which Bonding Protocol Provides the Most Durable Zirconia Adhesion after In Vitro Artificial Aging: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1215-1227.

体外人工老化后,哪种键合方案能提供最持久的氧化锆粘附:系统综述。
目的:本研究的目的是比较不同的粘合方案和氧化锆表面处理,以确定最有效的方法,以实现在老化方案后与树脂粘结剂的牢固和持久的粘合。材料和方法:本研究根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,通过Medline (PubMed)、Cochrane图书馆和Science Direct数据库,使用医学主题词(MeSH)术语、同义词和关键词“牙键合”、“氧化锆”、“剪切强度”、“氧化钇稳定四边形氧化锆”和“寿命”的组合进行,并使用布尔运算符(“and”和“OR”)来优化结果。纳入的研究是根据审查过程之前制定的明确定义的纳入和排除标准确定的。为了获得最近的结果,我们只收录了2014年以后发表的文章。结果:检索得到714条记录,其中15项研究符合入选标准,经筛选和全文审查后纳入。提取氧化锆类型、表面预处理、装配材料、获得的结合强度、时效等数据,并在不同的表格中列出。乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)工具的偏倚风险评估显示,纳入的研究中有75%为低风险,25%为中等风险。结论:根据我们的研究结果,空气颗粒磨损(APA)是最有效的预处理策略,特别是当与10-甲基丙烯酰氧十二基磷酸二氢(10-MDP)底漆和自粘树脂水泥结合使用时,可以持久可靠地与氧化锆结合。临床意义:修复体治疗的核心目标是保证氧化锆修复体的长期成功,这在很大程度上取决于临床医生选择的粘接方案。根据这篇综述,最有效的方法是空气颗粒磨损(APA)结合含有10- mdp的底漆或通用粘合剂,因为这种方法可以提供持久可靠的氧化锆粘附。如何引用本文:Ayedi L, Riahi Z, Kalghoum I,等。体外人工老化后,哪种键合方案能提供最持久的氧化锆粘附:系统综述。[J]现代医学学报,2015;26(12):1215-1227。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书