Inert Ceramics for Dental Prosthesis: Bibliometric Analysis and Comparative Assessment of Their Morphology and Chemical Composition.

Q3 Dentistry

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3987

Cristian Boanca, Kamel Earar, Dorin I Cocoş, Cristian C Budacu

{"title":"Inert Ceramics for Dental Prosthesis: Bibliometric Analysis and Comparative Assessment of Their Morphology and Chemical Composition.","authors":"Cristian Boanca, Kamel Earar, Dorin I Cocoş, Cristian C Budacu","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To analyze the bibliometric evolution of inert bioceramics in dentistry and compare the morphology and chemical composition of four ceramic-based restorative materials.Materials and methods: Four groups of experimental samples were fabricated: Monolithic yttria-stabilized zirconia (ZrO2), monolithic lithium disilicate (Li2Si2O5), ZrO2 veneered with feldspathic porcelain, and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) veneered with feldspathic porcelain. Each sample was processed using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), heat pressing, or conventional layering techniques and characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphology, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental composition, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for surface chemical analysis.Results: Monolithic restorations showed homogeneous surfaces with stable composition, while Li2Si2O5 presented microcracks. Layered samples revealed a sharp ceramic-ceramic boundary and a chemically bonded oxide layer at the metal-ceramic interface.Conclusion: Processing preserved chemical stability in all groups, with stronger adhesion observed in metal-ceramic systems.Clinical significance: Material selection should balance esthetics with interfacial stability to ensure long-term restoration performance. How to cite this article: Boanca C, Earar K, Cocoş DI, et al. Inert Ceramics for Dental Prosthesis: Bibliometric Analysis and Comparative Assessment of Their Morphology and Chemical Composition. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1125-1133.","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 12","pages":"1125-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To analyze the bibliometric evolution of inert bioceramics in dentistry and compare the morphology and chemical composition of four ceramic-based restorative materials.

Materials and methods: Four groups of experimental samples were fabricated: Monolithic yttria-stabilized zirconia (ZrO₂), monolithic lithium disilicate (Li₂Si₂O₅), ZrO₂ veneered with feldspathic porcelain, and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) veneered with feldspathic porcelain. Each sample was processed using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), heat pressing, or conventional layering techniques and characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphology, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental composition, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for surface chemical analysis.

Results: Monolithic restorations showed homogeneous surfaces with stable composition, while Li₂Si₂O₅ presented microcracks. Layered samples revealed a sharp ceramic-ceramic boundary and a chemically bonded oxide layer at the metal-ceramic interface.

Conclusion: Processing preserved chemical stability in all groups, with stronger adhesion observed in metal-ceramic systems.

Clinical significance: Material selection should balance esthetics with interfacial stability to ensure long-term restoration performance. How to cite this article: Boanca C, Earar K, Cocoş DI, et al. Inert Ceramics for Dental Prosthesis: Bibliometric Analysis and Comparative Assessment of Their Morphology and Chemical Composition. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1125-1133.

查看原文本刊更多论文

口腔修复用惰性陶瓷：文献计量学分析及其形态和化学成分的比较评估。

目的：分析牙科惰性生物陶瓷的文献计量学演变，比较四种陶瓷基修复材料的形态和化学成分。材料与方法：制备了四组实验样品：单片氧化钇稳定氧化锆（ZrO2）、单片二硅酸锂（Li2Si2O5）、长石瓷贴面ZrO2和长石瓷贴面钴铬（Co-Cr）。每个样品都使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造（CAD/CAM），热压或传统分层技术进行处理，并使用扫描电子显微镜（SEM）进行形貌表征，能量色散x射线光谱（EDS）进行元素组成表征，x射线光电子能谱（XPS）进行表面化学分析。结果：整体修复体表面均质，成分稳定，而Li2Si2O5则存在微裂纹。层状样品显示出一个尖锐的陶瓷-陶瓷边界和金属-陶瓷界面上的化学键合氧化层。结论：处理保持了各组的化学稳定性，在金属陶瓷体系中观察到更强的附着力。临床意义：材料选择应平衡美观与界面稳定性，以保证长期修复性能。文章引用方式：Boanca C， Earar K， cocoak DI等。口腔修复用惰性陶瓷：文献计量学分析及其形态和化学成分的比较评估。[J]现代医学杂志，2015;26(12):1125-1133。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

174

期刊介绍： The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.