Endoscopic Total Thyroidectomy via a Single-Port Subclavian Approach Versus Open Surgery for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

IF 1.5 Q2 Medicine
Pei-Liang Lin, Fa-Ya Liang, Lan-Lan Deng, Ping Han, Ren-Hui Chen, Xi-Jun Lin, Jing-Yi Wang, Xiao-Ming Huang
{"title":"Endoscopic Total Thyroidectomy via a Single-Port Subclavian Approach Versus Open Surgery for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Pei-Liang Lin, Fa-Ya Liang, Lan-Lan Deng, Ping Han, Ren-Hui Chen, Xi-Jun Lin, Jing-Yi Wang, Xiao-Ming Huang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Historically, performing contralateral thyroid lobectomy and lymph node dissection via the subclavian approach has been considered challenging. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of gasless endoscopic total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection via the single-port subclavian approach (SpSCA) in comparison with conventional open surgery for the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and June 2023, 120 patients diagnosed with PTC were retrospectively enrolled into this study, with 26 undergoing the SpSCA procedure and 94 receiving conventional surgery. Propensity score full matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. Subsequently, weighted regression analyses (adjusted for age) were used to compare perioperative outcomes, complications, survival, and esthetic results between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, the SpSCA procedure was associated with a significantly longer operative time than open surgery (adjusted difference: 37.3 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.5-58.2). However, no significant differences were noted in postoperative hospital stay, bleeding volume, drainage volume, or major complications between the groups. During the median follow-up period of 34-36 months, biologic events occurred in six patients who underwent open surgery and one patient who underwent SpSCA; no structural events were observed. Disease-free survival curves were similar between the groups. The SpSCA group exhibited significantly higher esthetic satisfaction scores (adjusted difference: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.56-2.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SpSCA approach is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional surgery for selected patients with PTC, offering superior esthetic results and comparable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13494648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.70159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Historically, performing contralateral thyroid lobectomy and lymph node dissection via the subclavian approach has been considered challenging. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of gasless endoscopic total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection via the single-port subclavian approach (SpSCA) in comparison with conventional open surgery for the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods: Between January 2019 and June 2023, 120 patients diagnosed with PTC were retrospectively enrolled into this study, with 26 undergoing the SpSCA procedure and 94 receiving conventional surgery. Propensity score full matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. Subsequently, weighted regression analyses (adjusted for age) were used to compare perioperative outcomes, complications, survival, and esthetic results between the groups.

Results: After matching, the SpSCA procedure was associated with a significantly longer operative time than open surgery (adjusted difference: 37.3 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.5-58.2). However, no significant differences were noted in postoperative hospital stay, bleeding volume, drainage volume, or major complications between the groups. During the median follow-up period of 34-36 months, biologic events occurred in six patients who underwent open surgery and one patient who underwent SpSCA; no structural events were observed. Disease-free survival curves were similar between the groups. The SpSCA group exhibited significantly higher esthetic satisfaction scores (adjusted difference: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.56-2.96).

Conclusion: The SpSCA approach is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional surgery for selected patients with PTC, offering superior esthetic results and comparable clinical outcomes.

单孔锁骨下入路内镜下全甲状腺切除术与开放手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的比较。
目的:历史上,通过锁骨下入路进行对侧甲状腺小叶切除术和淋巴结清扫被认为是具有挑战性的。本研究评估了经单孔锁骨下入路(SpSCA)行无气内镜下甲状腺全切除术和中央室颈部清扫术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的安全性和可行性。方法:在2019年1月至2023年6月期间,回顾性研究了120例诊断为PTC的患者,其中26例接受了SpSCA手术,94例接受了常规手术。倾向评分完全匹配用于平衡各组之间的基线特征。随后,采用加权回归分析(调整年龄)比较两组围手术期结局、并发症、生存率和美观结果。结果:匹配后,SpSCA手术的手术时间明显长于开放手术(调整差值:37.3 min, 95%可信区间[CI]: 16.5-58.2)。然而,两组在术后住院时间、出血量、引流量或主要并发症方面无显著差异。在34-36个月的中位随访期间,6例接受开放手术的患者和1例接受SpSCA的患者发生了生物学事件;未观察到结构性事件。两组间无病生存曲线相似。SpSCA组表现出更高的审美满意度得分(调整差:2.26,95% CI: 1.56 ~ 2.96)。结论:对于特定的PTC患者,SpSCA入路是一种安全可行的替代传统手术的方法,具有良好的美学效果和可比较的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书