Re-Defining Modern Zoo Roles Through the '7-Pillar Framework': Quantitative Evidence From Zoo Visitors and Non-Zoo Visitors.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Zoo Biology Pub Date : 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1002/zoo.70095
Andrea Rizzardi Orlandi, Peter Kraftl, Richard Sands, Sanne W van der Kleij, Sarah R Beck
{"title":"Re-Defining Modern Zoo Roles Through the '7-Pillar Framework': Quantitative Evidence From Zoo Visitors and Non-Zoo Visitors.","authors":"Andrea Rizzardi Orlandi, Peter Kraftl, Richard Sands, Sanne W van der Kleij, Sarah R Beck","doi":"10.1002/zoo.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, the roles of zoos have been summarised in the '4-Pillar Framework' comprising Conservation, Education, Entertainment and Research elements. However, recent research identified the need for a more comprehensive model that better reflects zoos' contributions to both species conservation and society. This new model, which we describe for comparative purposes as the '7-Pillar Framework', incorporates additional roles: Health & Well-being, Conservation Finance, Economy and Policy & Decision-making, while removing Entertainment. Despite its theoretical solidity, no studies have empirically evaluated whether this new framework aligns with society's view of zoos. Given that societal perceptions around zoos are influenced by both zoo visitors and non-zoo visitors, we sought to determine whether the 7-Pillar Framework accurately reflects broader society's perceptions of zoo roles. A representative sample of 350 members of the UK public completed an online questionnaire. We employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the validity of the 7-Pillar Framework and compare it to the traditional 4-Pillar Framework. Our findings indicated that the 7-Pillar Framework better aligns with public perceptions, providing empirical support for its adoption. However, the Entertainment role remains unclear, receiving the highest rating but being excluded in the best-fitting model. In conclusion, public recognition of this model highlights the effectiveness of zoos in communicating their broader societal contributions and may suggest a route to increasing the number of visitors exposed to conservation education initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":24035,"journal":{"name":"Zoo Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoo Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.70095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, the roles of zoos have been summarised in the '4-Pillar Framework' comprising Conservation, Education, Entertainment and Research elements. However, recent research identified the need for a more comprehensive model that better reflects zoos' contributions to both species conservation and society. This new model, which we describe for comparative purposes as the '7-Pillar Framework', incorporates additional roles: Health & Well-being, Conservation Finance, Economy and Policy & Decision-making, while removing Entertainment. Despite its theoretical solidity, no studies have empirically evaluated whether this new framework aligns with society's view of zoos. Given that societal perceptions around zoos are influenced by both zoo visitors and non-zoo visitors, we sought to determine whether the 7-Pillar Framework accurately reflects broader society's perceptions of zoo roles. A representative sample of 350 members of the UK public completed an online questionnaire. We employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the validity of the 7-Pillar Framework and compare it to the traditional 4-Pillar Framework. Our findings indicated that the 7-Pillar Framework better aligns with public perceptions, providing empirical support for its adoption. However, the Entertainment role remains unclear, receiving the highest rating but being excluded in the best-fitting model. In conclusion, public recognition of this model highlights the effectiveness of zoos in communicating their broader societal contributions and may suggest a route to increasing the number of visitors exposed to conservation education initiatives.

通过“七柱框架”重新定义现代动物园角色:来自动物园游客和非动物园游客的定量证据。
传统上,动物园的角色被概括为“四支柱框架”,包括保护、教育、娱乐和研究元素。然而,最近的研究表明,需要一个更全面的模型来更好地反映动物园对物种保护和社会的贡献。为了便于比较,我们将这种新模式描述为“7支柱框架”,它包含了额外的角色:健康与福祉、保护金融、经济和政策与决策,同时删除了娱乐。尽管它在理论上是可靠的,但没有研究从经验上评估这个新框架是否与社会对动物园的看法一致。鉴于社会对动物园的看法受到动物园游客和非动物园游客的影响,我们试图确定7支柱框架是否准确地反映了更广泛的社会对动物园角色的看法。350名英国公众的代表性样本完成了一份在线问卷。我们采用验证性因子分析(CFA)来评估7支柱框架的有效性,并将其与传统的4支柱框架进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,七支柱框架更符合公众的看法,为其采用提供了实证支持。然而,娱乐界的角色仍然不明朗,虽然获得了最高的评分,但却被排除在最合适的模型之外。总之,公众对这种模式的认可突出了动物园在传播其更广泛的社会贡献方面的有效性,并可能为增加接触保护教育倡议的游客数量提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoo Biology
Zoo Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoo Biology is concerned with reproduction, demographics, genetics, behavior, medicine, husbandry, nutrition, conservation and all empirical aspects of the exhibition and maintenance of wild animals in wildlife parks, zoos, and aquariums. This diverse journal offers a forum for effectively communicating scientific findings, original ideas, and critical thinking related to the role of wildlife collections and their unique contribution to conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书