Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Dental Varnishes on White Spot Lesion around Orthodontic Brackets: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Diya Chakraborty, Mora Sr Reddy, George Sam, Angel Kurian, Mayank Trivedi, Ambikathanaya U Kumaraswamy, Shazia Mushtaq
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Dental Varnishes on White Spot Lesion around Orthodontic Brackets: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.","authors":"Diya Chakraborty, Mora Sr Reddy, George Sam, Angel Kurian, Mayank Trivedi, Ambikathanaya U Kumaraswamy, Shazia Mushtaq","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The current study was aimed to evaluate the impact of three different dental varnishes on white spot lesions (WSLs) underlying orthodontic brackets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study sample consisted of 90 premolar teeth that were extracted for orthodontic reasons. Following the placement of the brackets, each sample was coated with nail polish, preserving a 3 mm long × 3 mm wide window from the bracket margin's cervical region. The demineralizing process was carried out using a demineralizing solution, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to collect the baseline data. Simple randomized sampling was used to randomly divide all 90 extracted teeth into three groups, i.e., 30 samples in each group. Group I: Fluor Protector varnish, group II: Clinpro White varnish, group III: CPP-ACPF Varnish. After a week, a layer of varnish solution was directly applied to the tooth surface using a microbrush. The effectiveness of each sample was assessed after 15 days using an SEM set at 2000× magnification. Data was recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the enamel demineralization score was 134.28 ± 0.16 Fluor Protector varnish group, 135.18 ± 0.06 for Clinpro White varnish group, and 134.02 ± 0.30 for the CPP-ACPF varnish group. No significant difference was obtained among the three different enamel demineralization scores. After 2 weeks, the maximum reduction of scores was found in the CPP-ACPF varnish group, i.e., 98.68 ± 0.10, followed by the Clinpro White varnish group with a mean score of 108.32 ± 0.02 and the Fluor Protector varnish group with a mean score of 114.46 ± 0.09. A significant difference was obtained among three different enamel demineralization scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On conclusion, employing CPP-ACPF varnish around the orthodontic bracket could efficiently prevent the formation of WSL and provide surface enamel protection as compared to the Clinpro White varnish group and Fluor Protector varnish group.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>White spot lesion formation or enamel demineralization throughout the course of fixed appliance therapy is one of the most frequent clinical challenges in orthodontic clinical practice. Therefore, these lesions present esthetic difficulties, which influence the patient's perception of treatment satisfaction. Applying fluoride varnish can considerably reduce the demineralization lesion that forms around the bracket after fluorapatite is formed. How to cite this article: Chakraborty D, Reddy MSR, Sam G, <i>et al</i>. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Dental Varnishes on White Spot Lesion around Orthodontic Brackets: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1169-1172.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 12","pages":"1169-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The current study was aimed to evaluate the impact of three different dental varnishes on white spot lesions (WSLs) underlying orthodontic brackets.

Materials and methods: The present study sample consisted of 90 premolar teeth that were extracted for orthodontic reasons. Following the placement of the brackets, each sample was coated with nail polish, preserving a 3 mm long × 3 mm wide window from the bracket margin's cervical region. The demineralizing process was carried out using a demineralizing solution, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to collect the baseline data. Simple randomized sampling was used to randomly divide all 90 extracted teeth into three groups, i.e., 30 samples in each group. Group I: Fluor Protector varnish, group II: Clinpro White varnish, group III: CPP-ACPF Varnish. After a week, a layer of varnish solution was directly applied to the tooth surface using a microbrush. The effectiveness of each sample was assessed after 15 days using an SEM set at 2000× magnification. Data was recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: At baseline, the enamel demineralization score was 134.28 ± 0.16 Fluor Protector varnish group, 135.18 ± 0.06 for Clinpro White varnish group, and 134.02 ± 0.30 for the CPP-ACPF varnish group. No significant difference was obtained among the three different enamel demineralization scores. After 2 weeks, the maximum reduction of scores was found in the CPP-ACPF varnish group, i.e., 98.68 ± 0.10, followed by the Clinpro White varnish group with a mean score of 108.32 ± 0.02 and the Fluor Protector varnish group with a mean score of 114.46 ± 0.09. A significant difference was obtained among three different enamel demineralization scores.

Conclusion: On conclusion, employing CPP-ACPF varnish around the orthodontic bracket could efficiently prevent the formation of WSL and provide surface enamel protection as compared to the Clinpro White varnish group and Fluor Protector varnish group.

Clinical significance: White spot lesion formation or enamel demineralization throughout the course of fixed appliance therapy is one of the most frequent clinical challenges in orthodontic clinical practice. Therefore, these lesions present esthetic difficulties, which influence the patient's perception of treatment satisfaction. Applying fluoride varnish can considerably reduce the demineralization lesion that forms around the bracket after fluorapatite is formed. How to cite this article: Chakraborty D, Reddy MSR, Sam G, et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Dental Varnishes on White Spot Lesion around Orthodontic Brackets: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(12):1169-1172.

不同牙清漆对正畸托槽周围白斑病变的效果评价:扫描电镜研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估三种不同的牙清漆对正畸托槽下白斑病变的影响。材料和方法:本研究的样本包括90颗因正畸原因拔出的前磨牙。放置托架后,每个样本涂上指甲油,从托架边缘的颈部区域保留3mm长× 3mm宽的窗口。采用脱矿液进行脱矿过程,并通过扫描电镜(SEM)收集基线数据。采用简单随机抽样法,将拔出的90颗牙齿随机分为3组,每组30颗。第一组:氟保护剂清漆,第二组:Clinpro白色清漆,第三组:pcp - acpf清漆。一周后,用微刷直接在牙齿表面涂上一层清漆溶液。15天后,使用2000倍放大的扫描电镜(SEM)评估每个样品的有效性。记录数据并进行统计分析。结果:基线时,氟保护剂组牙釉质脱矿评分为134.28±0.16,Clinpro White组牙釉质脱矿评分为135.18±0.06,CPP-ACPF组牙釉质脱矿评分为134.02±0.30。三种牙釉质脱矿评分无显著性差异。2周后,CPP-ACPF清漆组的评分下降幅度最大,为98.68±0.10,其次是Clinpro White清漆组,平均评分为108.32±0.02,Fluor Protector清漆组平均评分为114.46±0.09。三种牙釉质脱矿评分差异显著。结论:综上所述,与Clinpro White清漆组和fluprotector清漆组相比,在正畸托槽周围使用CPP-ACPF清漆可以有效地防止WSL的形成,并提供表面牙釉质保护。临床意义:固定矫治器治疗过程中出现白斑病变或牙釉质脱矿是正畸临床实践中最常见的临床难题之一。因此,这些病变呈现审美困难,影响患者对治疗满意度的感知。使用含氟清漆可以大大减少在氟磷灰石形成后在支架周围形成的脱矿损伤。如何引用本文:Chakraborty D, Reddy MSR, Sam G,等。不同牙清漆对正畸托槽周围白斑病变的效果评价:扫描电镜研究。[J]现代医学学报,2015;26(12):1169-1172。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书