Comparison of urodynamic outcomes by hysterectomy technique: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Raymundo A Munoz, José M Arroyo, Alfonzo E Munoz, Joel Herrera, Marcos Iglesias, Marlene Muñiz, Salvador Pizarro
{"title":"Comparison of urodynamic outcomes by hysterectomy technique: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Raymundo A Munoz, José M Arroyo, Alfonzo E Munoz, Joel Herrera, Marcos Iglesias, Marlene Muñiz, Salvador Pizarro","doi":"10.1177/03915603261478158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although hysterectomy significantly alters pelvic anatomy, its long-term effects on bladder function, pelvic floor integrity, and urethral sphincter activity remain controversial. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings, often limited by surgical variability, heterogeneous study populations, and differing definitions of detrusor hypocontractility. This study aimed to determine whether urodynamic results-specifically, detrusor contractility, urethral sphincter function, and pelvic floor function-differ according to hysterectomy technique. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional analysis of urodynamic studies from women who underwent abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic hysterectomy in Mexico between 2019 and 2024. Standardized thresholds derived from established urodynamic references were used to evaluate detrusor function, sphincter strength, and pelvic floor integrity. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests were applied (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among 172 women, 124 (72.1%) underwent abdominal hysterectomy, 40 (23.2%) vaginal, and 8 (4.6%) laparoscopic. No significant differences were found in pelvic floor function or urethral pressure profile across surgical types. However, patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy more frequently demonstrated urodynamic findings consistent with detrusor hypocontractility, with lower Qmax and detrusor contraction index values. This is the first study to directly compare urodynamic parameters across hysterectomy techniques. Vaginal hysterectomy was associated with a higher prevalence of urodynamic findings consistent with detrusor hypocontractility, whereas urethral and pelvic floor function remained unaffected by surgical approach. Although the observed association does not imply causality, these findings support further investigation of the relationship between hysterectomy technique and postoperative bladder function, particularly in patients for whom vaginal hysterectomy is considered and who have known risk factors for detrusor hypocontractility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603261478158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603261478158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although hysterectomy significantly alters pelvic anatomy, its long-term effects on bladder function, pelvic floor integrity, and urethral sphincter activity remain controversial. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings, often limited by surgical variability, heterogeneous study populations, and differing definitions of detrusor hypocontractility. This study aimed to determine whether urodynamic results-specifically, detrusor contractility, urethral sphincter function, and pelvic floor function-differ according to hysterectomy technique. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional analysis of urodynamic studies from women who underwent abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic hysterectomy in Mexico between 2019 and 2024. Standardized thresholds derived from established urodynamic references were used to evaluate detrusor function, sphincter strength, and pelvic floor integrity. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests were applied (p < 0.05). Among 172 women, 124 (72.1%) underwent abdominal hysterectomy, 40 (23.2%) vaginal, and 8 (4.6%) laparoscopic. No significant differences were found in pelvic floor function or urethral pressure profile across surgical types. However, patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy more frequently demonstrated urodynamic findings consistent with detrusor hypocontractility, with lower Qmax and detrusor contraction index values. This is the first study to directly compare urodynamic parameters across hysterectomy techniques. Vaginal hysterectomy was associated with a higher prevalence of urodynamic findings consistent with detrusor hypocontractility, whereas urethral and pelvic floor function remained unaffected by surgical approach. Although the observed association does not imply causality, these findings support further investigation of the relationship between hysterectomy technique and postoperative bladder function, particularly in patients for whom vaginal hysterectomy is considered and who have known risk factors for detrusor hypocontractility.

子宫切除术后尿动力学结果的比较:一项横断面研究。
尽管子宫切除术显著改变了骨盆解剖结构,但其对膀胱功能、盆底完整性和尿道括约肌活动的长期影响仍存在争议。先前的研究报告了不一致的结果,通常受到手术变异性、异质研究人群和逼尿肌收缩不足的不同定义的限制。本研究旨在确定尿动力学结果——特别是逼尿肌收缩力、尿道括约肌功能和盆底功能——是否因子宫切除术技术的不同而不同。我们对2019年至2024年间在墨西哥接受腹部、阴道或腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性进行了回顾性、单中心、横断面分析。标准化阈值来源于已建立的尿动力学参考文献,用于评估逼尿肌功能、括约肌强度和盆底完整性。采用方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书