2-Year outcomes of endovascular therapy of popliteal artery restenosis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tanja Böhme, Elias Noory, Ulrich Beschorner, Frank Güntert, Jonas Salm, Roaa Bollenbacher, Dirk Westermann, Thomas Zeller
{"title":"2-Year outcomes of endovascular therapy of popliteal artery restenosis.","authors":"Tanja Böhme, Elias Noory, Ulrich Beschorner, Frank Güntert, Jonas Salm, Roaa Bollenbacher, Dirk Westermann, Thomas Zeller","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> To assess the mid-term outcome of endovascular treatment for popliteal artery restenosis. <i>Patients and methods:</i> This retrospective study included patients with peripheral artery disease (Rutherford class (RC) 2-5) and popliteal artery restenosis treated between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients were classified into four groups based on lesion extent: isolated popliteal lesions and lesions extending to femoral and/or below-the-knee arteries (BTK). The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included TLR at 24 months, changes in RC, ankle-brachial index (ABI), amputation and mortality rates. <i>Results:</i> A total of 332 patients were analyzed. Ninety-two patients received popliteal treatment only (group I), in 81 patients lesion extended into the femoral artery (group II), 112 lesions extended into the BTK arteries (group III), and 47 lesions involved both, femoral and BTK arteries (group IV). At 12 months, the overall TLR rate was 34.6%, with no significant differences between subgroups. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty showed a significant benefit during the first 12 months (p = .035), but this advantage was not sustained thereafter (p = .798). TLR rates did not differ significantly between patients treated with stent angioplasty and those without stenting (p = .087). Significant improvements in ABI and RC were observed in all groups. Major amputation rates were 0.9% at 12 months and 1.8% at 24 months. Mortality rates were 1.5% and 7.5%, respectively. <i>Conclusions:</i> Reintervention rate after endovascular treatment of popliteal artery restenosis is high. The potential benefits of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and stent angioplasty require further clarification through prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the mid-term outcome of endovascular treatment for popliteal artery restenosis. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included patients with peripheral artery disease (Rutherford class (RC) 2-5) and popliteal artery restenosis treated between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients were classified into four groups based on lesion extent: isolated popliteal lesions and lesions extending to femoral and/or below-the-knee arteries (BTK). The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included TLR at 24 months, changes in RC, ankle-brachial index (ABI), amputation and mortality rates. Results: A total of 332 patients were analyzed. Ninety-two patients received popliteal treatment only (group I), in 81 patients lesion extended into the femoral artery (group II), 112 lesions extended into the BTK arteries (group III), and 47 lesions involved both, femoral and BTK arteries (group IV). At 12 months, the overall TLR rate was 34.6%, with no significant differences between subgroups. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty showed a significant benefit during the first 12 months (p = .035), but this advantage was not sustained thereafter (p = .798). TLR rates did not differ significantly between patients treated with stent angioplasty and those without stenting (p = .087). Significant improvements in ABI and RC were observed in all groups. Major amputation rates were 0.9% at 12 months and 1.8% at 24 months. Mortality rates were 1.5% and 7.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Reintervention rate after endovascular treatment of popliteal artery restenosis is high. The potential benefits of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and stent angioplasty require further clarification through prospective studies.

腘动脉再狭窄血管内治疗2年疗效观察。
背景:评价血管内治疗腘动脉再狭窄的中期疗效。患者和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2007年1月至2017年12月治疗的外周动脉疾病(Rutherford class (RC) 2-5)和腘动脉再狭窄患者。根据病变程度将患者分为四组:孤立的腘窝病变和延伸至股动脉和/或膝下动脉(BTK)的病变。主要终点是12个月时的靶病变血运重建术(TLR)。次要终点包括24个月时TLR、RC变化、踝肱指数(ABI)、截肢和死亡率。结果:共分析332例患者。92例患者仅接受腘窝治疗(I组),81例病变延伸至股动脉(II组),112例病变延伸至BTK动脉(III组),47例病变同时累及股动脉和BTK动脉(IV组)。12个月时,总TLR率为34.6%,亚组间无显著差异。药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术在前12个月显示出显著的益处(p = 0.035),但此后这种优势没有持续(p = 0.798)。TLR率在支架成形术患者和未支架成形术患者之间无显著差异(p = 0.087)。所有组ABI和RC均有显著改善。12个月时主要截肢率为0.9%,24个月时为1.8%。死亡率分别为1.5%和7.5%。结论:血管内治疗腘动脉再狭窄后再干预率高。药物包被球囊血管成形术和支架血管成形术的潜在益处需要通过前瞻性研究进一步阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书