Impact of chronic beta-blocker versus renin-angiotensin inhibitor use on outcomes after blunt pelvic trauma.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2026.110475
Zeyanna Dhalla, Kaitlin Nunn, Victoria Teoh, Diana Arellano
{"title":"Impact of chronic beta-blocker versus renin-angiotensin inhibitor use on outcomes after blunt pelvic trauma.","authors":"Zeyanna Dhalla, Kaitlin Nunn, Victoria Teoh, Diana Arellano","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2026.110475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic cardiovascular medications, including β-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, may modify the physiologic response to trauma. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of pelvic fracture patients with preinjury β-blockers versus renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use after blunt pelvic trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using TriNetX. Data was collected from 2015 to 2025, with a total sample size of n = 442,947 distributed across 16 comparison groups. Propensity score matching was applied to yield equitable cohorts based on medical comorbidities. Patient groups were mutually exclusive, such that individuals were classified as taking either a β-blocker or a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, with exclusion of patients receiving both therapies or an antiplatelet treatment. Comparisons were made with outcomes that include hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The β-blocker group demonstrated higher rates of adverse events, including hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality, relative to the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor group. The differences were most pronounced when renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were compared with metoprolol and labetalol, where nearly all outcomes were significantly worse in the β-blocker cohorts. In contrast, no significant differences were observed when compared with carvedilol or atenolol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior use of β-blockers is correlated with significantly worse rates of hemorrhage, infection, and thromboembolic events after a traumatic pelvic fracture when compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. This could be due to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors attenuating the post-traumatic inflammatory response system by blocking angiotensin II, which causes inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction. These findings suggest that chronic cardiovascular therapy type may influence post-pelvic trauma outcomes, underscoring the need for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"110475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2026.110475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic cardiovascular medications, including β-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, may modify the physiologic response to trauma. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of pelvic fracture patients with preinjury β-blockers versus renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use after blunt pelvic trauma.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using TriNetX. Data was collected from 2015 to 2025, with a total sample size of n = 442,947 distributed across 16 comparison groups. Propensity score matching was applied to yield equitable cohorts based on medical comorbidities. Patient groups were mutually exclusive, such that individuals were classified as taking either a β-blocker or a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, with exclusion of patients receiving both therapies or an antiplatelet treatment. Comparisons were made with outcomes that include hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality.

Results: The β-blocker group demonstrated higher rates of adverse events, including hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality, relative to the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor group. The differences were most pronounced when renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were compared with metoprolol and labetalol, where nearly all outcomes were significantly worse in the β-blocker cohorts. In contrast, no significant differences were observed when compared with carvedilol or atenolol.

Conclusion: Prior use of β-blockers is correlated with significantly worse rates of hemorrhage, infection, and thromboembolic events after a traumatic pelvic fracture when compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. This could be due to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors attenuating the post-traumatic inflammatory response system by blocking angiotensin II, which causes inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction. These findings suggest that chronic cardiovascular therapy type may influence post-pelvic trauma outcomes, underscoring the need for further investigation.

慢性-受体阻滞剂与肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂对钝性骨盆创伤后预后的影响。
背景:慢性心血管药物,包括β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂,可能会改变创伤的生理反应。本研究的目的是比较骨盆骨折患者在钝性骨盆创伤后使用损伤前β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的结果。方法:采用TriNetX进行回顾性队列研究。数据收集时间为2015 - 2025年,总样本量n = 442,947,分布在16个对照组中。倾向评分匹配应用于基于医疗合并症的公平队列。患者组是相互排斥的,因此个体被分类为服用β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂,排除接受两种治疗或抗血小板治疗的患者。比较结果包括出血、感染、肺炎、败血症、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、呼吸通气和死亡率。结果:与肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂组相比,β受体阻滞剂组表现出更高的不良事件发生率,包括出血、感染、肺炎、败血症、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、呼吸通气和死亡率。当肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与美托洛尔和拉贝他洛尔进行比较时,差异最为明显,在β受体阻滞剂组中,几乎所有结果都明显更差。相比之下,与卡维地洛或阿替洛尔相比,没有观察到显著差异。结论:与肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂相比,先前使用β受体阻滞剂与外伤性骨盆骨折后出血、感染和血栓栓塞事件发生率显著升高相关。这可能是由于肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂通过阻断血管紧张素II来减轻创伤后炎症反应系统,而血管紧张素II会导致炎症、氧化应激、内皮功能障碍和血管收缩。这些发现提示慢性心血管治疗类型可能影响盆腔创伤后的预后,强调需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书