Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Ophthalmic Regenerative Medicine: From Cell Replacement to Precision Engineering.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Bei Li, Le Ling, Ruixi Liu, Xin Zhang, Yifan Kang, Jinlin Guo
{"title":"Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Ophthalmic Regenerative Medicine: From Cell Replacement to Precision Engineering.","authors":"Bei Li, Le Ling, Ruixi Liu, Xin Zhang, Yifan Kang, Jinlin Guo","doi":"10.1007/s12015-026-11220-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adipose‑derived stem cells (ASCs) have emerged as a promising cell source in ophthalmic regenerative medicine, attributed to their accessibility, differentiation potential, and paracrine functions. Despite compelling preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Departing from the conventional disease‑oriented categorization, this review adopts the cognitive evolution of ASC therapeutic mechanisms as its organizational thread, synthesizing evidence from 158 studies across six ophthalmic subspecialties. Four sequential paradigms are identified: (1) multilineage differentiation and cell replacement; (2) paracrine signaling and microenvironmental modulation; (3) extracellular vesicles and cell‑free therapy; and (4) engineering modifications and precision delivery. Cross‑disciplinary synthesis reveals a fundamental contradiction: the inherent capacity of living ASCs to sense and respond to local microenvironments directly conflicts with the pharmacological requirements for standardization and predictability. Five major translational bottlenecks are distilled, namely, the absence of functional potency standards, the rodent‑to‑human translational gap, insufficient therapeutic window studies, low‑level clinical evidence outside oculoplastics, and regulatory ambiguity. A corresponding roadmap is proposed, centered on functional potency evaluation, engineered cell‑free products, and an ophthalmic‑specific long‑term safety framework. This review provides a unified theoretical framework for contextualizing the prospects of ASC‑based therapies and offers strategic guidance to facilitate their clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21955,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-026-11220-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adipose‑derived stem cells (ASCs) have emerged as a promising cell source in ophthalmic regenerative medicine, attributed to their accessibility, differentiation potential, and paracrine functions. Despite compelling preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Departing from the conventional disease‑oriented categorization, this review adopts the cognitive evolution of ASC therapeutic mechanisms as its organizational thread, synthesizing evidence from 158 studies across six ophthalmic subspecialties. Four sequential paradigms are identified: (1) multilineage differentiation and cell replacement; (2) paracrine signaling and microenvironmental modulation; (3) extracellular vesicles and cell‑free therapy; and (4) engineering modifications and precision delivery. Cross‑disciplinary synthesis reveals a fundamental contradiction: the inherent capacity of living ASCs to sense and respond to local microenvironments directly conflicts with the pharmacological requirements for standardization and predictability. Five major translational bottlenecks are distilled, namely, the absence of functional potency standards, the rodent‑to‑human translational gap, insufficient therapeutic window studies, low‑level clinical evidence outside oculoplastics, and regulatory ambiguity. A corresponding roadmap is proposed, centered on functional potency evaluation, engineered cell‑free products, and an ophthalmic‑specific long‑term safety framework. This review provides a unified theoretical framework for contextualizing the prospects of ASC‑based therapies and offers strategic guidance to facilitate their clinical translation.

脂肪干细胞在眼再生医学中的应用:从细胞替代到精密工程。
脂肪源性干细胞(ASCs)由于其可及性、分化潜力和旁分泌功能,已成为眼科再生医学中一个很有前途的细胞来源。尽管有令人信服的临床前证据,临床结果仍然不令人满意。与传统的以疾病为导向的分类不同,本综述采用ASC治疗机制的认知演变作为其组织线索,综合了来自6个眼科亚专科的158项研究的证据。我们确定了四个顺序范式:(1)多谱系分化和细胞替换;(2)旁分泌信号和微环境调节;(3)细胞外囊泡和无细胞治疗;(4)工程修改及精度交付。跨学科综合揭示了一个基本矛盾:活体ASCs感知和响应局部微环境的固有能力与标准化和可预测性的药理学要求直接冲突。总结了五大翻译瓶颈,即缺乏功能效价标准,啮齿动物到人类的翻译差距,治疗窗口研究不足,眼整形之外的低水平临床证据以及监管模糊。提出了相应的路线图,以功能效价评估、工程化无细胞产品和眼科特异性长期安全性框架为中心。这篇综述为基于ASC的治疗的前景提供了一个统一的理论框架,并为促进其临床转化提供了战略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 医学-细胞生物学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Stem Cell Reviews and Reports is to cover contemporary and emerging areas in stem cell research and regenerative medicine. The journal will consider for publication: i) solicited or unsolicited reviews of topical areas of stem cell biology that highlight, critique and synthesize recent important findings in the field. ii) full length and short reports presenting original experimental work. iii) translational stem cell studies describing results of clinical trials using stem cells as therapeutics. iv) papers focused on diseases of stem cells. v) hypothesis and commentary articles as opinion-based pieces in which authors can propose a new theory, interpretation of a controversial area in stem cell biology, or a stem cell biology question or paradigm. These articles contain more speculation than reviews, but they should be based on solid rationale. vi) protocols as peer-reviewed procedures that provide step-by-step descriptions, outlined in sufficient detail, so that both experts and novices can apply them to their own research. vii) letters to the editor and correspondence. In order to facilitate this exchange of scientific information and exciting novel ideas, the journal has created five thematic sections, focusing on: i) the role of adult stem cells in tissue regeneration; ii) progress in research on induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and mechanism governing embryogenesis and tissue development; iii) the role of microenvironment and extracellular microvesicles in directing the fate of stem cells; iv) mechanisms of stem cell trafficking, stem cell mobilization and homing with special emphasis on hematopoiesis; v) the role of stem cells in aging processes and cancerogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书