Bei Li, Le Ling, Ruixi Liu, Xin Zhang, Yifan Kang, Jinlin Guo
{"title":"Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Ophthalmic Regenerative Medicine: From Cell Replacement to Precision Engineering.","authors":"Bei Li, Le Ling, Ruixi Liu, Xin Zhang, Yifan Kang, Jinlin Guo","doi":"10.1007/s12015-026-11220-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adipose‑derived stem cells (ASCs) have emerged as a promising cell source in ophthalmic regenerative medicine, attributed to their accessibility, differentiation potential, and paracrine functions. Despite compelling preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Departing from the conventional disease‑oriented categorization, this review adopts the cognitive evolution of ASC therapeutic mechanisms as its organizational thread, synthesizing evidence from 158 studies across six ophthalmic subspecialties. Four sequential paradigms are identified: (1) multilineage differentiation and cell replacement; (2) paracrine signaling and microenvironmental modulation; (3) extracellular vesicles and cell‑free therapy; and (4) engineering modifications and precision delivery. Cross‑disciplinary synthesis reveals a fundamental contradiction: the inherent capacity of living ASCs to sense and respond to local microenvironments directly conflicts with the pharmacological requirements for standardization and predictability. Five major translational bottlenecks are distilled, namely, the absence of functional potency standards, the rodent‑to‑human translational gap, insufficient therapeutic window studies, low‑level clinical evidence outside oculoplastics, and regulatory ambiguity. A corresponding roadmap is proposed, centered on functional potency evaluation, engineered cell‑free products, and an ophthalmic‑specific long‑term safety framework. This review provides a unified theoretical framework for contextualizing the prospects of ASC‑based therapies and offers strategic guidance to facilitate their clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21955,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-026-11220-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adipose‑derived stem cells (ASCs) have emerged as a promising cell source in ophthalmic regenerative medicine, attributed to their accessibility, differentiation potential, and paracrine functions. Despite compelling preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Departing from the conventional disease‑oriented categorization, this review adopts the cognitive evolution of ASC therapeutic mechanisms as its organizational thread, synthesizing evidence from 158 studies across six ophthalmic subspecialties. Four sequential paradigms are identified: (1) multilineage differentiation and cell replacement; (2) paracrine signaling and microenvironmental modulation; (3) extracellular vesicles and cell‑free therapy; and (4) engineering modifications and precision delivery. Cross‑disciplinary synthesis reveals a fundamental contradiction: the inherent capacity of living ASCs to sense and respond to local microenvironments directly conflicts with the pharmacological requirements for standardization and predictability. Five major translational bottlenecks are distilled, namely, the absence of functional potency standards, the rodent‑to‑human translational gap, insufficient therapeutic window studies, low‑level clinical evidence outside oculoplastics, and regulatory ambiguity. A corresponding roadmap is proposed, centered on functional potency evaluation, engineered cell‑free products, and an ophthalmic‑specific long‑term safety framework. This review provides a unified theoretical framework for contextualizing the prospects of ASC‑based therapies and offers strategic guidance to facilitate their clinical translation.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Stem Cell Reviews and Reports is to cover contemporary and emerging areas in stem cell research and regenerative medicine. The journal will consider for publication:
i) solicited or unsolicited reviews of topical areas of stem cell biology that highlight, critique and synthesize recent important findings in the field.
ii) full length and short reports presenting original experimental work.
iii) translational stem cell studies describing results of clinical trials using stem cells as therapeutics.
iv) papers focused on diseases of stem cells.
v) hypothesis and commentary articles as opinion-based pieces in which authors can propose a new theory, interpretation of a controversial area in stem cell biology, or a stem cell biology question or paradigm. These articles contain more speculation than reviews, but they should be based on solid rationale.
vi) protocols as peer-reviewed procedures that provide step-by-step descriptions, outlined in sufficient detail, so that both experts and novices can apply them to their own research.
vii) letters to the editor and correspondence.
In order to facilitate this exchange of scientific information and exciting novel ideas, the journal has created five thematic sections, focusing on:
i) the role of adult stem cells in tissue regeneration;
ii) progress in research on induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and mechanism governing embryogenesis and tissue development;
iii) the role of microenvironment and extracellular microvesicles in directing the fate of stem cells;
iv) mechanisms of stem cell trafficking, stem cell mobilization and homing with special emphasis on hematopoiesis;
v) the role of stem cells in aging processes and cancerogenesis.