Thromboelastography Parameters Thresholds for Optimal Prediction of Major Bleeding after On-Pump Cardiac Surgery.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Zhili Xu, Xinchen Tao, Han Cao, Junyu Zhou, Qi Gao, Jingcheng Zou, Jie Xiao, Jing Yu, Kai Sun, Ge Luo, Tingting Ni, Yuanyuan Yao, Min Yan
{"title":"Thromboelastography Parameters Thresholds for Optimal Prediction of Major Bleeding after On-Pump Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Zhili Xu, Xinchen Tao, Han Cao, Junyu Zhou, Qi Gao, Jingcheng Zou, Jie Xiao, Jing Yu, Kai Sun, Ge Luo, Tingting Ni, Yuanyuan Yao, Min Yan","doi":"10.1055/a-2924-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>As cardiac surgery volumes increase worldwide, major bleeding remains a significant complication following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. Accurate prediction of postoperative hemorrhage risk is crucial. This study aimed to establish optimal thromboelastography (TEG) parameter thresholds for predicting major postoperative hemorrhage in patients undergoing CPB during cardiac procedures, thereby creating a reliable early warning system to reduce hemorrhagic complications. This study retrospectively analyzed 3,810 cardiac surgery patients requiring CPB, divided into major bleeding, defined as 1,000 mL or more chest tube drainage within 24 hours (<i>n</i> = 245), and non-major bleeding (<i>n</i> = 3,565) groups. To identify independent risk factors, logistic regression analysis was used to compare the two groups. Then, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were developed to determine optimal predictive thresholds and evaluate sensitivity and specificity. The immediate postoperative coagulation index of -1.75 demonstrated a specificity of 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.4-61.7%) and sensitivity of 78.5% (95% CI: 73.3-83.8%) for predicting major bleeding following CPB surgery, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.55 (95% CI: 3.24-6.38). Other immediate postoperative TEG parameters also showed predictive value, including reaction time (<i>R</i>; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70), kinetics time (<i>K</i>) (AUC = 0.71), α-angle (AUC = 0.69), and maximum amplitude (MA; AUC = 0.67). Additionally, post-CPB MA of 58.05 mm also demonstrated predictive value for predicting postoperative major bleeding. TEG parameter analysis demonstrated that the immediate postoperative coagulation index provides high predictive accuracy for major postoperative hemorrhage in cardiac surgery patients undergoing CPB. Furthermore, other postoperative TEG parameters also demonstrate moderate predictive significance. These findings may help clinicians identify high-risk patients at an early stage and provide a reference for enhanced monitoring and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2924-0114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: As cardiac surgery volumes increase worldwide, major bleeding remains a significant complication following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. Accurate prediction of postoperative hemorrhage risk is crucial. This study aimed to establish optimal thromboelastography (TEG) parameter thresholds for predicting major postoperative hemorrhage in patients undergoing CPB during cardiac procedures, thereby creating a reliable early warning system to reduce hemorrhagic complications. This study retrospectively analyzed 3,810 cardiac surgery patients requiring CPB, divided into major bleeding, defined as 1,000 mL or more chest tube drainage within 24 hours (n = 245), and non-major bleeding (n = 3,565) groups. To identify independent risk factors, logistic regression analysis was used to compare the two groups. Then, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were developed to determine optimal predictive thresholds and evaluate sensitivity and specificity. The immediate postoperative coagulation index of -1.75 demonstrated a specificity of 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.4-61.7%) and sensitivity of 78.5% (95% CI: 73.3-83.8%) for predicting major bleeding following CPB surgery, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.55 (95% CI: 3.24-6.38). Other immediate postoperative TEG parameters also showed predictive value, including reaction time (R; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70), kinetics time (K) (AUC = 0.71), α-angle (AUC = 0.69), and maximum amplitude (MA; AUC = 0.67). Additionally, post-CPB MA of 58.05 mm also demonstrated predictive value for predicting postoperative major bleeding. TEG parameter analysis demonstrated that the immediate postoperative coagulation index provides high predictive accuracy for major postoperative hemorrhage in cardiac surgery patients undergoing CPB. Furthermore, other postoperative TEG parameters also demonstrate moderate predictive significance. These findings may help clinicians identify high-risk patients at an early stage and provide a reference for enhanced monitoring and clinical decision-making.

无泵心脏手术后大出血最佳预测的血栓弹性成像参数阈值。
摘要:随着世界范围内心脏手术数量的增加,大出血仍然是体外循环(CPB)手术后的一个重要并发症。准确预测术后出血风险至关重要。本研究旨在建立最佳的血栓弹性成像(TEG)参数阈值,用于预测心脏手术中CPB患者的术后大出血,从而建立可靠的早期预警系统,以减少出血并发症。本研究回顾性分析3810例需要CPB的心脏手术患者,分为大出血组(定义为24小时内胸腔引流1000 mL及以上)(n = 245)和非大出血组(n = 3565)。为确定独立危险因素,采用logistic回归分析对两组患者进行比较。然后,制定受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以确定最佳预测阈值并评估敏感性和特异性。术后立即凝血指数为-1.75,预测CPB手术后大出血的特异性为60.0%(95%可信区间[CI]: 58.4-61.7%),敏感性为78.5% (95% CI: 73.3-83.8%),优势比(OR)为4.55 (95% CI: 3.24-6.38)。其他术后即刻TEG参数也具有预测价值,包括反应时间(R,曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.70)、动力学时间(K) (AUC = 0.71)、α-角(AUC = 0.69)和最大振幅(MA, AUC = 0.67)。此外,cpb后58.05 mm的MA对预测术后大出血也具有预测价值。TEG参数分析表明,术后立即凝血指数对CPB心脏手术患者术后大出血具有较高的预测准确性。此外,其他术后TEG参数也显示出中等的预测意义。这些发现可能有助于临床医生早期识别高危患者,并为加强监测和临床决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
21.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers. Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书