The Traumatic Event Checklist for North Korean Defectors.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.30773/pi.2025.0149
Kyoung-A Kim, Hokon Kim, OckSim Kim, Woo Taek Jeon, Sang Hui Chu
{"title":"The Traumatic Event Checklist for North Korean Defectors.","authors":"Kyoung-A Kim, Hokon Kim, OckSim Kim, Woo Taek Jeon, Sang Hui Chu","doi":"10.30773/pi.2025.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a trauma checklist specifically designed to capture the complex and culturally unique potentially traumatic events (PTEs) experienced by North Korean defectors (NKDs), in alignment with International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision criteria that distinguish posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from complex PTSD (cPTSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional secondary data analysis was conducted using online survey data from 520 NKDs. Participants were randomly divided into two groups (n=260 each) for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A preliminary 22-item PTE checklist was refined through factor analysis and reliability testing. Criterion validity was assessed using the Depression and Somatic Symptom Scale and World Health Organization of Life Assessment Instrument Bref. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0 and AMOS 28.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA identified a four-factor model: \"death and life-threatening events,\" \"interpersonal violence and discrimination,\" \"violence by public authorities,\" and \"family dissolution\"-comprising 17 refined items. CFA confirmed a good model fit (RMSEA=0.059, GFI=0.930, CFI=0.930). Internal consistency for the total scale was high (Cronbach's α=0.830), with acceptable reliability across most subscales. The checklist demonstrated strong criterion validity with depression, somatic symptoms, and quality of life indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revised PTEs checklist is a valid and reliable screening tool that reflects NKDs' unique trauma experiences across the pre-, peri-, and post-migration phases. Its combined use with the International Trauma Questionnaire is recommended for comprehensive trauma assessment and tailored intervention planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"23 8","pages":"1005-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a trauma checklist specifically designed to capture the complex and culturally unique potentially traumatic events (PTEs) experienced by North Korean defectors (NKDs), in alignment with International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision criteria that distinguish posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from complex PTSD (cPTSD).

Methods: A cross-sectional secondary data analysis was conducted using online survey data from 520 NKDs. Participants were randomly divided into two groups (n=260 each) for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A preliminary 22-item PTE checklist was refined through factor analysis and reliability testing. Criterion validity was assessed using the Depression and Somatic Symptom Scale and World Health Organization of Life Assessment Instrument Bref. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0 and AMOS 28.0.

Results: EFA identified a four-factor model: "death and life-threatening events," "interpersonal violence and discrimination," "violence by public authorities," and "family dissolution"-comprising 17 refined items. CFA confirmed a good model fit (RMSEA=0.059, GFI=0.930, CFI=0.930). Internal consistency for the total scale was high (Cronbach's α=0.830), with acceptable reliability across most subscales. The checklist demonstrated strong criterion validity with depression, somatic symptoms, and quality of life indices.

Conclusion: The revised PTEs checklist is a valid and reliable screening tool that reflects NKDs' unique trauma experiences across the pre-, peri-, and post-migration phases. Its combined use with the International Trauma Questionnaire is recommended for comprehensive trauma assessment and tailored intervention planning.

脱北者创伤事件清单。
目的:本研究旨在根据区分创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)的国际疾病分类第11版标准,开发并验证一份创伤清单,该清单专门用于捕捉朝鲜叛逃者(NKDs)经历的复杂和文化上独特的潜在创伤事件(pte)。方法:利用520个NKDs的在线调查数据进行横断面二次资料分析。参与者随机分为两组(n=260)进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。通过因子分析和信度检验,完善了初步的22项PTE检查表。采用抑郁与躯体症状量表和世界卫生组织生命评估工具概要评估标准效度。采用SPSS 28.0和AMOS 28.0进行统计学分析。结果:全民教育确定了一个四因素模型:“死亡和危及生命的事件”、“人际暴力和歧视”、“公共当局的暴力”和“家庭解体”,由17个细化项目组成。CFA证实模型拟合良好(RMSEA=0.059, GFI=0.930, CFI=0.930)。总体量表的内部一致性较高(Cronbach's α=0.830),在大多数子量表上具有可接受的信度。该检查表在抑郁、躯体症状和生活质量指标方面显示出很强的标准效度。结论:修订后的pte检查表是一种有效和可靠的筛查工具,反映了nkd在迁移前、迁移中和迁移后阶段的独特创伤经历。建议将其与国际创伤问卷结合使用,以进行全面的创伤评估和量身定制的干预计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书