Mental health and support profiles among children's advocacy center multidisciplinary team members working with victims of child sexual abuse material.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kimberly J Mitchell, Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan, Lisa M Jones, Wendy Walsh, Deirde Colburn, Jennifer E O'Brien
{"title":"Mental health and support profiles among children's advocacy center multidisciplinary team members working with victims of child sexual abuse material.","authors":"Kimberly J Mitchell, Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan, Lisa M Jones, Wendy Walsh, Deirde Colburn, Jennifer E O'Brien","doi":"10.1037/tra0002251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Professionals working with child sexual abuse, including child sexual abuse material (CSAM), are at risk for adverse mental health outcomes due to repeated exposure to distressing experiences. Previous research on trauma-exposed professionals working with CSAM has focused on forensic examiners and law enforcement personnel, overlooking other Children's Advocacy Center multidisciplinary team (MDT) members who engage in CSAM-related work. Guided by compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress frameworks, this study examined heterogeneity in occupational functioning among MDT professionals working with CSAM-related cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study applied latent profile analysis to examine mental health and support patterns in a sample of 357 MDT members affiliated with Children's Advocacy Centers in the United States. Profiles were based on symptoms (e.g., depression, burnout), work-related attitudes, support seeking, and agency support. Occupational and agency-level factors were compared across profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-profile solution emerged: (1) isolated burnout (9.2%), (2) unsupported burnout (21.9%), (3) ambivalent (51.0%), and (4) empowered and supported (17.9%). Profiles differed across levels of psychological distress, burnout, organizational support, autonomy, and work-related functioning. The isolated burnout profile demonstrated the highest levels of depression, anxiety, and burnout, whereas the empowered and supported profile demonstrated the lowest distress and greatest organizational support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight heterogeneity in trauma-related occupational functioning among MDT members, with the majority reporting good mental health and feelings toward their work. The findings suggest that MDT professionals exposed to CSAM-related work do not experience uniform psychological outcomes and that organizational support, autonomy, and positive professional engagement may co-occur with more adaptive functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Professionals working with child sexual abuse, including child sexual abuse material (CSAM), are at risk for adverse mental health outcomes due to repeated exposure to distressing experiences. Previous research on trauma-exposed professionals working with CSAM has focused on forensic examiners and law enforcement personnel, overlooking other Children's Advocacy Center multidisciplinary team (MDT) members who engage in CSAM-related work. Guided by compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress frameworks, this study examined heterogeneity in occupational functioning among MDT professionals working with CSAM-related cases.

Method: This study applied latent profile analysis to examine mental health and support patterns in a sample of 357 MDT members affiliated with Children's Advocacy Centers in the United States. Profiles were based on symptoms (e.g., depression, burnout), work-related attitudes, support seeking, and agency support. Occupational and agency-level factors were compared across profiles.

Results: A four-profile solution emerged: (1) isolated burnout (9.2%), (2) unsupported burnout (21.9%), (3) ambivalent (51.0%), and (4) empowered and supported (17.9%). Profiles differed across levels of psychological distress, burnout, organizational support, autonomy, and work-related functioning. The isolated burnout profile demonstrated the highest levels of depression, anxiety, and burnout, whereas the empowered and supported profile demonstrated the lowest distress and greatest organizational support.

Conclusions: Findings highlight heterogeneity in trauma-related occupational functioning among MDT members, with the majority reporting good mental health and feelings toward their work. The findings suggest that MDT professionals exposed to CSAM-related work do not experience uniform psychological outcomes and that organizational support, autonomy, and positive professional engagement may co-occur with more adaptive functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

儿童倡导中心多学科团队成员与儿童性虐待受害者合作的心理健康和支持概况材料。
目的:从事儿童性虐待工作的专业人员,包括儿童性虐待材料(CSAM),由于反复接触痛苦的经历,有不良心理健康结果的风险。以往对创伤暴露专业人员的研究主要集中在法医鉴定人员和执法人员身上,忽视了其他从事创伤暴露相关工作的儿童倡导中心多学科团队(MDT)成员。在同情疲劳和继发性创伤应激框架的指导下,本研究考察了治疗csam相关病例的MDT专业人员职业功能的异质性。方法:本研究应用潜在特征分析来检查美国儿童倡导中心附属的357名MDT成员的心理健康和支持模式。档案是基于症状(如抑郁、倦怠)、与工作有关的态度、寻求支持和机构支持。职业和机构水平的因素进行了跨概况的比较。结果:(1)孤立型倦怠(9.2%),(2)无支持型倦怠(21.9%),(3)矛盾型倦怠(51.0%),(4)授权和支持型倦怠(17.9%)。不同水平的心理困扰、倦怠、组织支持、自主性和工作功能的情况不同。孤立倦怠组表现出最高水平的抑郁、焦虑和倦怠,而授权和支持组表现出最低的痛苦和最大的组织支持。结论:研究结果强调了MDT成员创伤相关职业功能的异质性,大多数人报告良好的心理健康和对工作的感觉。研究结果表明,从事csam相关工作的MDT专业人员的心理结果并不一致,组织支持、自主性和积极的专业投入可能与更强的适应功能同时出现。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书