Medication adherence is associated with the necessity-concern differential in newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease: a prospective observational cohort study.
Kemal Erol, Ezgi Akyıldız Tezcan, Naciye Baş Bilen, Cemal Gürbüz
{"title":"Medication adherence is associated with the necessity-concern differential in newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease: a prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Kemal Erol, Ezgi Akyıldız Tezcan, Naciye Baş Bilen, Cemal Gürbüz","doi":"10.1007/s00296-026-06201-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objectives of this study were, firstly, to assess medication adherence and, secondly, to evaluate the relationships between medication adherence and symptoms, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease (pSjD). In this prospective observational cohort study, 54 patients with newly diagnosed pSjD were enrolled in a tertiary rheumatology clinic. Forty patients (74.1%) were reassessed after a mean follow-up of 21.36 ± 4.79 months. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology-5 (CQR-5), classifying patients as low or high adherence. Disease activity, symptom burden, psychological symptoms, fatigue, functional status, health-related quality of life, and medication beliefs were evaluated using ESSDAI, ESSPRI, HADS, fatigue severity assessment, HAQ, SF-12, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The necessity-concern differential (NCD) was calculated as the BMQ-specific necessity score minus the concern score. Logistic regression analysis was exploratory. The cohort was predominantly female (52/54, 96.3%), with a mean age of 49.7 ± 9.5 years. At follow-up, 16 patients (40%) were classified as low adherence and 24 (60%) as high adherence. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between groups. ESSDAI scores remained low and stable over time, and ESSPRI increased modestly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Psychological status, fatigue, functional status, and quality of life were similar across adherence categories. Specific necessity scores were numerically higher in high-adherence patients (3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 3.04 ± 1.06; p = 0.267), whereas concern scores tended to be higher in low-adherence patients (3.46 ± 0.92 vs. 3.07 ± 0.63; p = 0.115). The NCD was significantly lower in the low-adherence group than in the high-adherence group (- 0.43 ± 1.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.96; p = 0.038). In exploratory logistic regression, higher NCD was associated with high adherence (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.76). In patients with newly diagnosed pSjD, low medication adherence was frequent and was associated with patients' necessity-concern balance rather than clinical disease activity or patient-reported burden. Because adherence and medication beliefs were assessed at the same time point and CQR-5 has not been specifically validated in pSjD, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and non-causal.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"46 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-026-06201-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objectives of this study were, firstly, to assess medication adherence and, secondly, to evaluate the relationships between medication adherence and symptoms, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease (pSjD). In this prospective observational cohort study, 54 patients with newly diagnosed pSjD were enrolled in a tertiary rheumatology clinic. Forty patients (74.1%) were reassessed after a mean follow-up of 21.36 ± 4.79 months. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology-5 (CQR-5), classifying patients as low or high adherence. Disease activity, symptom burden, psychological symptoms, fatigue, functional status, health-related quality of life, and medication beliefs were evaluated using ESSDAI, ESSPRI, HADS, fatigue severity assessment, HAQ, SF-12, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The necessity-concern differential (NCD) was calculated as the BMQ-specific necessity score minus the concern score. Logistic regression analysis was exploratory. The cohort was predominantly female (52/54, 96.3%), with a mean age of 49.7 ± 9.5 years. At follow-up, 16 patients (40%) were classified as low adherence and 24 (60%) as high adherence. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between groups. ESSDAI scores remained low and stable over time, and ESSPRI increased modestly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Psychological status, fatigue, functional status, and quality of life were similar across adherence categories. Specific necessity scores were numerically higher in high-adherence patients (3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 3.04 ± 1.06; p = 0.267), whereas concern scores tended to be higher in low-adherence patients (3.46 ± 0.92 vs. 3.07 ± 0.63; p = 0.115). The NCD was significantly lower in the low-adherence group than in the high-adherence group (- 0.43 ± 1.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.96; p = 0.038). In exploratory logistic regression, higher NCD was associated with high adherence (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.76). In patients with newly diagnosed pSjD, low medication adherence was frequent and was associated with patients' necessity-concern balance rather than clinical disease activity or patient-reported burden. Because adherence and medication beliefs were assessed at the same time point and CQR-5 has not been specifically validated in pSjD, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and non-causal.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.