Medication adherence is associated with the necessity-concern differential in newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease: a prospective observational cohort study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kemal Erol, Ezgi Akyıldız Tezcan, Naciye Baş Bilen, Cemal Gürbüz
{"title":"Medication adherence is associated with the necessity-concern differential in newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease: a prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Kemal Erol, Ezgi Akyıldız Tezcan, Naciye Baş Bilen, Cemal Gürbüz","doi":"10.1007/s00296-026-06201-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objectives of this study were, firstly, to assess medication adherence and, secondly, to evaluate the relationships between medication adherence and symptoms, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease (pSjD). In this prospective observational cohort study, 54 patients with newly diagnosed pSjD were enrolled in a tertiary rheumatology clinic. Forty patients (74.1%) were reassessed after a mean follow-up of 21.36 ± 4.79 months. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology-5 (CQR-5), classifying patients as low or high adherence. Disease activity, symptom burden, psychological symptoms, fatigue, functional status, health-related quality of life, and medication beliefs were evaluated using ESSDAI, ESSPRI, HADS, fatigue severity assessment, HAQ, SF-12, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The necessity-concern differential (NCD) was calculated as the BMQ-specific necessity score minus the concern score. Logistic regression analysis was exploratory. The cohort was predominantly female (52/54, 96.3%), with a mean age of 49.7 ± 9.5 years. At follow-up, 16 patients (40%) were classified as low adherence and 24 (60%) as high adherence. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between groups. ESSDAI scores remained low and stable over time, and ESSPRI increased modestly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Psychological status, fatigue, functional status, and quality of life were similar across adherence categories. Specific necessity scores were numerically higher in high-adherence patients (3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 3.04 ± 1.06; p = 0.267), whereas concern scores tended to be higher in low-adherence patients (3.46 ± 0.92 vs. 3.07 ± 0.63; p = 0.115). The NCD was significantly lower in the low-adherence group than in the high-adherence group (- 0.43 ± 1.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.96; p = 0.038). In exploratory logistic regression, higher NCD was associated with high adherence (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.76). In patients with newly diagnosed pSjD, low medication adherence was frequent and was associated with patients' necessity-concern balance rather than clinical disease activity or patient-reported burden. Because adherence and medication beliefs were assessed at the same time point and CQR-5 has not been specifically validated in pSjD, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and non-causal.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"46 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-026-06201-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study were, firstly, to assess medication adherence and, secondly, to evaluate the relationships between medication adherence and symptoms, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed primary Sjögren disease (pSjD). In this prospective observational cohort study, 54 patients with newly diagnosed pSjD were enrolled in a tertiary rheumatology clinic. Forty patients (74.1%) were reassessed after a mean follow-up of 21.36 ± 4.79 months. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology-5 (CQR-5), classifying patients as low or high adherence. Disease activity, symptom burden, psychological symptoms, fatigue, functional status, health-related quality of life, and medication beliefs were evaluated using ESSDAI, ESSPRI, HADS, fatigue severity assessment, HAQ, SF-12, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The necessity-concern differential (NCD) was calculated as the BMQ-specific necessity score minus the concern score. Logistic regression analysis was exploratory. The cohort was predominantly female (52/54, 96.3%), with a mean age of 49.7 ± 9.5 years. At follow-up, 16 patients (40%) were classified as low adherence and 24 (60%) as high adherence. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between groups. ESSDAI scores remained low and stable over time, and ESSPRI increased modestly in both groups without significant between-group differences. Psychological status, fatigue, functional status, and quality of life were similar across adherence categories. Specific necessity scores were numerically higher in high-adherence patients (3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 3.04 ± 1.06; p = 0.267), whereas concern scores tended to be higher in low-adherence patients (3.46 ± 0.92 vs. 3.07 ± 0.63; p = 0.115). The NCD was significantly lower in the low-adherence group than in the high-adherence group (- 0.43 ± 1.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.96; p = 0.038). In exploratory logistic regression, higher NCD was associated with high adherence (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.76). In patients with newly diagnosed pSjD, low medication adherence was frequent and was associated with patients' necessity-concern balance rather than clinical disease activity or patient-reported burden. Because adherence and medication beliefs were assessed at the same time point and CQR-5 has not been specifically validated in pSjD, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and non-causal.

在新诊断的原发性Sjögren疾病中,药物依从性与必要性-关注差异相关:一项前瞻性观察队列研究
本研究的目的首先是评估药物依从性,其次是评估新诊断的原发性Sjögren疾病(pSjD)患者的药物依从性与症状、疾病活动性和患者报告的结果之间的关系。在这项前瞻性观察队列研究中,54名新诊断的pSjD患者被纳入三级风湿病诊所。40例(74.1%)患者在平均随访21.36±4.79个月后重新评估。使用风湿病依从性问卷-5 (CQR-5)评估药物依从性,将患者分为低依从性和高依从性。采用ESSDAI、ESSPRI、HADS、疲劳严重程度评估、HAQ、SF-12和药物信念问卷(BMQ)评估疾病活动度、症状负担、心理症状、疲劳、功能状态、健康相关生活质量和用药信念。需要-关注差异(NCD)计算为bmq特定的需要分数减去关注分数。Logistic回归分析为探索性分析。该队列以女性为主(52/54,96.3%),平均年龄49.7±9.5岁。在随访中,16例患者(40%)被分类为低依从性,24例(60%)被分类为高依从性。两组之间的基线临床和社会人口学特征具有可比性。随着时间的推移,esdai评分保持较低且稳定,两组的ESSPRI均略有增加,组间无显著差异。心理状态、疲劳、功能状态和生活质量在不同的依从性类别中相似。高依从性患者的特定需要得分更高(3.37±0.79比3.04±1.06,p = 0.267),而低依从性患者的关注得分更高(3.46±0.92比3.07±0.63,p = 0.115)。低依从组NCD明显低于高依从组(- 0.43±1.16 vs. 0.30±0.96;p = 0.038)。在探索性逻辑回归中,较高的NCD与高依从性相关(OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.76)。在新诊断的pSjD患者中,低药物依从性是常见的,并且与患者的必要性-关注平衡有关,而不是与临床疾病活动或患者报告的负担有关。由于依从性和用药信念是在同一时间点评估的,而CQR-5尚未在pSjD中得到具体验证,因此这些发现应被解释为探索性和非因果性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书