{"title":"Identification of Clinical Phenotypes in Young Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Jiaqi Pu, Hailong Wei, Huiqing Ge, Huiguo Liu, Jianchu Zhang, Xianhua Li, Pinhua Pan, XiuFang Xie, Mengqiu Yi, Lina Cheng, Hui Zhou, Jiarui Zhang, Lige Peng, Jiaxin Zeng, Xueqing Chen, Haixia Zhou, Qun Yi","doi":"10.1159/res/aepag003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the rising recognition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in younger adults (20-50 years), the clinical heterogeneity of this population during acute exacerbations (AECOPD) remains undefined, obscuring precision risk stratification and personalized management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort across 10 tertiary hospitals in China (September 2017-July 2021). From 13,993 eligible patients, we identified 334 young AECOPD cases. Unsupervised K-means clustering was applied using nine biomarkers of inflammation, hematologic function, and structural lung damage. To contextualize its clinical relevance, the disease severity of the identified high-risk phenotype was benchmarked against the elderly AECOPD cohort (n = 13,659).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analysis identified two distinct phenotypes. The \"Systemic Inflammatory Phenotype\" (n = 179) was characterized by a pervasive inflammatory state (elevated C-reactive protein, neutrophils, white blood cell, procalcitonin, and fibrinogen) and significantly worse lung function. In contrast, the \"Eosinophilic Phenotype\" (n = 155) exhibited an eosinophil-predominant profile. Critically, the systemic inflammatory phenotype experienced a more severe hospital course, with significantly higher rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (3.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.017), noninvasive ventilation (23.5% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.003), and ICU admission (6.7% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.026). Notably, the overall disease severity of this high-risk phenotype was comparable to the elderly AECOPD cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a high-risk systemic inflammatory phenotype among young AECOPD inpatients, demonstrating clinical acuity on par with elderly patients. These findings challenge the conventional age-centric risk paradigm and advocate for a shift toward phenotype-driven assessment to enable early identification and targeted management of young AECOPD patients at the greatest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/res/aepag003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the rising recognition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in younger adults (20-50 years), the clinical heterogeneity of this population during acute exacerbations (AECOPD) remains undefined, obscuring precision risk stratification and personalized management.
Methods: This study analyzed data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort across 10 tertiary hospitals in China (September 2017-July 2021). From 13,993 eligible patients, we identified 334 young AECOPD cases. Unsupervised K-means clustering was applied using nine biomarkers of inflammation, hematologic function, and structural lung damage. To contextualize its clinical relevance, the disease severity of the identified high-risk phenotype was benchmarked against the elderly AECOPD cohort (n = 13,659).
Results: Cluster analysis identified two distinct phenotypes. The "Systemic Inflammatory Phenotype" (n = 179) was characterized by a pervasive inflammatory state (elevated C-reactive protein, neutrophils, white blood cell, procalcitonin, and fibrinogen) and significantly worse lung function. In contrast, the "Eosinophilic Phenotype" (n = 155) exhibited an eosinophil-predominant profile. Critically, the systemic inflammatory phenotype experienced a more severe hospital course, with significantly higher rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (3.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.017), noninvasive ventilation (23.5% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.003), and ICU admission (6.7% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.026). Notably, the overall disease severity of this high-risk phenotype was comparable to the elderly AECOPD cohort.
Conclusion: We identified a high-risk systemic inflammatory phenotype among young AECOPD inpatients, demonstrating clinical acuity on par with elderly patients. These findings challenge the conventional age-centric risk paradigm and advocate for a shift toward phenotype-driven assessment to enable early identification and targeted management of young AECOPD patients at the greatest risk.
期刊介绍:
''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.