Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Anxiety Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.30773/pi.2025.0437
Dan Wang, Jingwen Sun, Eu Yong Chuan, Qinming Yu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Anxiety Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dan Wang, Jingwen Sun, Eu Yong Chuan, Qinming Yu","doi":"10.30773/pi.2025.0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating anxiety disorders in adults and provide evidence-based support for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing experimental groups that received acupuncture for anxiety disorders with control groups that did not were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase). The standardised mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) of each, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve RCTs involving 1,240 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed a significantly superior improvement in anxiety symptoms in the acupuncture group compared with the control group, based on both post-treatment scores (SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.48, p<0.001) and change score values (SMD=-1.11, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.65, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a consistent trend of efficacy across different assessment scales, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the acupuncture group and the control group (RR=1.97, 95% CI: 0.50 to 7.74). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant changes in the results, confirming the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence indicates that acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for treating anxiety disorders in adults, significantly reducing anxiety symptoms with an incidence of adverse events comparable to that of a control group. It is recommended that acupuncture be considered an alternative option in the comprehensive management of anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"23 8","pages":"963-975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating anxiety disorders in adults and provide evidence-based support for clinical practice.

Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing experimental groups that received acupuncture for anxiety disorders with control groups that did not were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase). The standardised mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) of each, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated.

Results: Twelve RCTs involving 1,240 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed a significantly superior improvement in anxiety symptoms in the acupuncture group compared with the control group, based on both post-treatment scores (SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.48, p<0.001) and change score values (SMD=-1.11, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.65, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a consistent trend of efficacy across different assessment scales, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the acupuncture group and the control group (RR=1.97, 95% CI: 0.50 to 7.74). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant changes in the results, confirming the robustness of these findings.

Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for treating anxiety disorders in adults, significantly reducing anxiety symptoms with an incidence of adverse events comparable to that of a control group. It is recommended that acupuncture be considered an alternative option in the comprehensive management of anxiety disorders.

针灸治疗成人焦虑症的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价针刺治疗成人焦虑症的疗效和安全性,为临床实践提供循证支持。方法:从四个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase)中检索随机对照试验(RCTs),比较实验组接受针灸治疗焦虑症和对照组未接受针灸治疗。计算每组的标准化平均差(SMD)和相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了12项随机对照试验,涉及1,240例患者。meta分析结果显示,基于治疗后评分(SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.11 ~ -0.48),针刺组焦虑症状的改善明显优于对照组。结论:目前的证据表明,针刺是治疗成人焦虑障碍的一种有效、安全的干预措施,显著减轻了焦虑症状,不良事件发生率与对照组相当。建议将针灸作为焦虑症综合治疗的另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书