Patient-reported reproductive concerns and care needs among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping.
Si-Yu Xie, Zhao-Bin Wan, Yan Shao, Wen-Yan Jiang, Min Hao, Wei Zhao
{"title":"Patient-reported reproductive concerns and care needs among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping.","authors":"Si-Yu Xie, Zhao-Bin Wan, Yan Shao, Wen-Yan Jiang, Min Hao, Wei Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00296-026-06279-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore reproductive concerns and care needs across reproductive contexts among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and develop a composite patient journey map. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 18 women purposively recruited from a tertiary hospital in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method and organised across four reproductive contexts and four mapping dimensions. Participants contributed only to contexts relevant to their reproductive histories. Reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). The composite journey map included four reproductive contexts and four dimensions: emotional experiences, behaviours, support resources, and key pain points. At diagnosis, women reported limited fertility-related information and uncertainty about future marriage and childbearing. During reproductive decision-making, they balanced perceived disease and medication risks with reproductive wishes, family expectations, caregiving resources, and financial capacity. During preconception and pregnancy, repeated monitoring, medication adjustment, and uncertainty about maternal and fetal safety were prominent. After childbirth, concerns centred on disease relapse, infant feeding, physical limitations, and combining treatment with childcare. Across these contexts, family involvement could provide emotional and practical support but could also create pressure. For some women, specific guidance on disease control, pregnancy timing, and medication adjustment was obtained only after they raised pregnancy plans. Reproductive concerns differed across reproductive contexts and involved pregnancy-related risks, family decision-making, practical constraints, and post-childbirth disease management and caregiving. The composite map may inform tailored reproductive communication, coordinated rheumatology-obstetric assessment, and postpartum support.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"46 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-026-06279-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To explore reproductive concerns and care needs across reproductive contexts among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and develop a composite patient journey map. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 18 women purposively recruited from a tertiary hospital in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method and organised across four reproductive contexts and four mapping dimensions. Participants contributed only to contexts relevant to their reproductive histories. Reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). The composite journey map included four reproductive contexts and four dimensions: emotional experiences, behaviours, support resources, and key pain points. At diagnosis, women reported limited fertility-related information and uncertainty about future marriage and childbearing. During reproductive decision-making, they balanced perceived disease and medication risks with reproductive wishes, family expectations, caregiving resources, and financial capacity. During preconception and pregnancy, repeated monitoring, medication adjustment, and uncertainty about maternal and fetal safety were prominent. After childbirth, concerns centred on disease relapse, infant feeding, physical limitations, and combining treatment with childcare. Across these contexts, family involvement could provide emotional and practical support but could also create pressure. For some women, specific guidance on disease control, pregnancy timing, and medication adjustment was obtained only after they raised pregnancy plans. Reproductive concerns differed across reproductive contexts and involved pregnancy-related risks, family decision-making, practical constraints, and post-childbirth disease management and caregiving. The composite map may inform tailored reproductive communication, coordinated rheumatology-obstetric assessment, and postpartum support.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.