Gülsüm Hançer, İbrahim Halil Deniz, M Murat Kırpınar, Neşe Kocabaşoğlu
{"title":"Separation Anxiety in Emerging Adults: The Role of Attachment Styles and Personality Traits.","authors":"Gülsüm Hançer, İbrahim Halil Deniz, M Murat Kırpınar, Neşe Kocabaşoğlu","doi":"10.30773/pi.2026.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine childhood and adult separation anxiety symptoms and their associations with attachment styles, personality traits, and sociodemographic factors among university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 200 first-year university students. Attachment styles and personality traits were assessed using the Three-Dimensional Attachment Style Scale and the Five-Factor Personality Inventory, respectively. Based on validated cut-off scores from the Separation Anxiety Symptom Inventory and the Adult Separation Anxiety Questionnaire, participants were classified as screen-negative (n=48, 24%), childhood separation anxiety symptom-positive (CSAD) (n=30, 15%), adult separation anxiety symptom-positive (ASAD) (n=27, 13.5%), or childhood and adult separation anxiety symptom-positive (CSAD&ASAD) (n=95, 47.5%). Group differences were analyzed using non-parametric tests, and hierarchical regression examined factors associated with adult separation anxiety symptom scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CSAD&ASAD group showed significantly lower secure attachment and higher avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment scores compared with other groups. Emotional stability scores were significantly higher in the screen-negative group than in the ASAD and CSAD&ASAD groups. Parental separation/divorce and firstborn status were associated with higher symptom levels. In multivariable analyses, higher Beck Anxiety Inventory scores (β=0.275, p<0.001), lower emotional stability (β=-0.266, p<0.001), lower conscientiousness (β=-0.155, p=0.012), and firstborn status (β=-0.114, p=0.045) were independently associated with adult separation anxiety symptom scores, with the final model explaining 48.3% of the variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Separation anxiety symptoms were common among university students. Findings highlight the role of internalizing symptom severity, personality traits, and selected sociodemographic factors in adult separation anxiety symptom scores. These findings should be interpreted at the symptom level and require confirmation through longitudinal and clinically structured studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"23 8","pages":"1058-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2026.0158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine childhood and adult separation anxiety symptoms and their associations with attachment styles, personality traits, and sociodemographic factors among university students.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 200 first-year university students. Attachment styles and personality traits were assessed using the Three-Dimensional Attachment Style Scale and the Five-Factor Personality Inventory, respectively. Based on validated cut-off scores from the Separation Anxiety Symptom Inventory and the Adult Separation Anxiety Questionnaire, participants were classified as screen-negative (n=48, 24%), childhood separation anxiety symptom-positive (CSAD) (n=30, 15%), adult separation anxiety symptom-positive (ASAD) (n=27, 13.5%), or childhood and adult separation anxiety symptom-positive (CSAD&ASAD) (n=95, 47.5%). Group differences were analyzed using non-parametric tests, and hierarchical regression examined factors associated with adult separation anxiety symptom scores.
Results: The CSAD&ASAD group showed significantly lower secure attachment and higher avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment scores compared with other groups. Emotional stability scores were significantly higher in the screen-negative group than in the ASAD and CSAD&ASAD groups. Parental separation/divorce and firstborn status were associated with higher symptom levels. In multivariable analyses, higher Beck Anxiety Inventory scores (β=0.275, p<0.001), lower emotional stability (β=-0.266, p<0.001), lower conscientiousness (β=-0.155, p=0.012), and firstborn status (β=-0.114, p=0.045) were independently associated with adult separation anxiety symptom scores, with the final model explaining 48.3% of the variance.
Conclusion: Separation anxiety symptoms were common among university students. Findings highlight the role of internalizing symptom severity, personality traits, and selected sociodemographic factors in adult separation anxiety symptom scores. These findings should be interpreted at the symptom level and require confirmation through longitudinal and clinically structured studies.
期刊介绍:
The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.