Black and Latiné Faces Capture Early Attention Measured by the P2 ERP Component: Departure From Whiteness as a Source of Salience.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Hannah I Volpert-Esmond, N J Jayce Owens-Boone, Evan J Romero
{"title":"Black and Latiné Faces Capture Early Attention Measured by the P2 ERP Component: Departure From Whiteness as a Source of Salience.","authors":"Hannah I Volpert-Esmond, N J Jayce Owens-Boone, Evan J Romero","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social interactions are shaped by rapid perception of others' racial group membership, which influences downstream judgments and behavior. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a method for examining how attention is allocated to race-related cues at very early stages of face perception. Prior research has shown that White perceivers attend more to Black faces than White faces, as indexed by the P2 component, but theoretical explanations of this effect are limited by over-reliance on White participants and limited consideration of how race perception operates within a racial hierarchy. Here, we expand prior research by recruiting Latiné undergraduate participants (N = 93) and expanding face stimuli to include Black, Latiné, and White faces that varied in terms of racial prototypicality (i.e., racially ambiguous faces were included). Replicating prior findings, Black faces elicited larger P2 amplitudes than both White faces and Latiné faces. Multilevel modeling of single-trial ERPs also found that racial prototypicality moderated P2 responses to each face, such that higher prototypicality predicted larger P2 amplitudes for Black and Latiné faces but not White faces. Self-reports of how threatened perceivers felt by each racial group did not account for these effects. Last, larger trial-level P2 amplitudes predicted faster categorization responses, but only for highly prototypical faces. Findings suggest that early attention is preferentially allocated to faces with high potential for non-White racial classification and that this attentional prioritization facilitates racial categorization only when visual cues are more racially prototypical.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"63 8","pages":"e70384"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13492690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social interactions are shaped by rapid perception of others' racial group membership, which influences downstream judgments and behavior. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a method for examining how attention is allocated to race-related cues at very early stages of face perception. Prior research has shown that White perceivers attend more to Black faces than White faces, as indexed by the P2 component, but theoretical explanations of this effect are limited by over-reliance on White participants and limited consideration of how race perception operates within a racial hierarchy. Here, we expand prior research by recruiting Latiné undergraduate participants (N = 93) and expanding face stimuli to include Black, Latiné, and White faces that varied in terms of racial prototypicality (i.e., racially ambiguous faces were included). Replicating prior findings, Black faces elicited larger P2 amplitudes than both White faces and Latiné faces. Multilevel modeling of single-trial ERPs also found that racial prototypicality moderated P2 responses to each face, such that higher prototypicality predicted larger P2 amplitudes for Black and Latiné faces but not White faces. Self-reports of how threatened perceivers felt by each racial group did not account for these effects. Last, larger trial-level P2 amplitudes predicted faster categorization responses, but only for highly prototypical faces. Findings suggest that early attention is preferentially allocated to faces with high potential for non-White racial classification and that this attentional prioritization facilitates racial categorization only when visual cues are more racially prototypical.

黑人和拉丁人的脸通过P2 ERP组件捕获早期注意力:偏离白色作为显著性的来源。
社会互动是由对他人种族群体成员身份的快速感知形成的,这影响了下游的判断和行为。事件相关电位(Event-related potential, ERPs)提供了一种方法来研究在面孔感知的早期阶段,注意力是如何分配到与种族相关的线索上的。先前的研究表明,白人感知者更关注黑人面孔,而不是白人面孔,正如P2成分所示,但由于过度依赖白人参与者,以及对种族感知如何在种族等级中运作的考虑有限,对这一效应的理论解释受到限制。在这里,我们通过招募拉丁裔本科生参与者(N = 93)来扩展先前的研究,并扩大面部刺激,包括黑人、拉丁裔和白人面孔,这些面孔在种族原型方面有所不同(即包括种族模糊的面孔)。与先前的发现重复,黑人面孔比白人面孔和拉丁人面孔激发出更大的P2振幅。单次试验erp的多层次建模还发现,种族原型性调节了对每张面孔的P2反应,因此,原型性越高,黑人和拉丁裔面孔的P2振幅越大,而白人面孔的P2振幅越大。每个种族的受威胁程度感知者的自我报告并没有考虑到这些影响。最后,较大的试验水平P2振幅预测更快的分类反应,但仅适用于高度原型化的面孔。研究结果表明,早期注意力优先分配给非白人种族分类的高潜力面孔,并且只有当视觉线索更具种族原型时,这种注意力优先分配才有利于种族分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书