Contemporary Sedation Strategies for Mechanical Ventilation: Balancing Patient Outcomes, Delirium Prevention, and Early Recovery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2026-08-21 DOI:10.1159/000550984
Luigi La Via, Giuseppe Cuttone, Giovanni Misseri, Tarek Senussi Testa, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Federico Pappalardo, Nicolò Patroniti
{"title":"Contemporary Sedation Strategies for Mechanical Ventilation: Balancing Patient Outcomes, Delirium Prevention, and Early Recovery.","authors":"Luigi La Via, Giuseppe Cuttone, Giovanni Misseri, Tarek Senussi Testa, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Federico Pappalardo, Nicolò Patroniti","doi":"10.1159/000550984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional deep sedation approach has been linked to prolonged ventilation, increased delirium incidence, and long-term cognitive impairment. Modern evidence now supports lighter sedation protocols with daily interruptions and spontaneous breathing trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The authors explore the pathophysiology of sedation-related complications including delirium, ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, and ICU-acquired weakness. They analyze clinical assessment tools ranging from validated scales to emerging objective monitoring technologies (processed electroencephalography, automated pupillometry). The pharmacological discussion contrasts traditional benzodiazepines with newer alternatives (propofol, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil) that show improved outcomes regarding delirium, ventilation duration, and cognitive function. Critical examination of sedation-ventilator mode interactions and comparison of analgosedation versus traditional sedation-first paradigms addresses unresolved clinical questions in integrating these therapeutic domains. Structured approaches including goal-oriented protocols and the ABCDEF bundle are presented as implementation frameworks. The review highlights non-pharmacologic interventions as essential complements to drug therapy: sleep promotion, early mobilization, family engagement, and environmental modifications. Special consideration is given to unique populations requiring tailored approaches, including geriatric, neurologic, cardiac, and COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The authors conclude by addressing future directions in sedation practice, emphasizing cost-effectiveness analysis, quality improvement initiatives, and research priorities that will guide the next phase of sedation management in mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The traditional deep sedation approach has been linked to prolonged ventilation, increased delirium incidence, and long-term cognitive impairment. Modern evidence now supports lighter sedation protocols with daily interruptions and spontaneous breathing trials.

Summary: The authors explore the pathophysiology of sedation-related complications including delirium, ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, and ICU-acquired weakness. They analyze clinical assessment tools ranging from validated scales to emerging objective monitoring technologies (processed electroencephalography, automated pupillometry). The pharmacological discussion contrasts traditional benzodiazepines with newer alternatives (propofol, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil) that show improved outcomes regarding delirium, ventilation duration, and cognitive function. Critical examination of sedation-ventilator mode interactions and comparison of analgosedation versus traditional sedation-first paradigms addresses unresolved clinical questions in integrating these therapeutic domains. Structured approaches including goal-oriented protocols and the ABCDEF bundle are presented as implementation frameworks. The review highlights non-pharmacologic interventions as essential complements to drug therapy: sleep promotion, early mobilization, family engagement, and environmental modifications. Special consideration is given to unique populations requiring tailored approaches, including geriatric, neurologic, cardiac, and COVID-19 patients.

Key messages: The authors conclude by addressing future directions in sedation practice, emphasizing cost-effectiveness analysis, quality improvement initiatives, and research priorities that will guide the next phase of sedation management in mechanical ventilation.

当代机械通气镇静策略:平衡患者预后、谵妄预防和早期恢复。
背景:传统的深度镇静方法与延长通气时间、增加谵妄发生率和长期认知障碍有关。现代证据现在支持轻度镇静方案,每天中断和自发呼吸试验。摘要:作者探讨了镇静相关并发症的病理生理学,包括谵妄、呼吸机引起的膈功能障碍和重症监护病房获得性虚弱。他们分析了临床评估工具,从经过验证的量表到新兴的客观监测技术(处理脑电图、自动瞳孔测量)。药理学讨论对比了传统的苯二氮卓类药物与新的替代品(异丙酚、右美托咪定、瑞芬太尼),这些替代品在谵妄、通气持续时间和认知功能方面显示出改善的结果。对镇静-呼吸机模式相互作用的批判性检查以及与传统镇静优先模式的比较,解决了整合这些治疗领域中尚未解决的临床问题。结构化方法包括面向目标的协议和ABCDEF包作为实现框架提出。该综述强调非药物干预是药物治疗的重要补充:促进睡眠、早期活动、家庭参与和环境改变。特别考虑到需要量身定制方法的特殊人群,包括老年、神经系统、心脏和COVID-19患者。关键信息:作者总结了镇静实践的未来方向,强调成本效益分析,质量改进举措和研究重点,这些将指导机械通气镇静管理的下一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书