A Systematic Review of Long-Term Safety Outcomes of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tychique T Wasolua, Morgan S Hardy, Tanner J Bommersbach, Roger S McIntyre, Taeho Greg Rhee
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Long-Term Safety Outcomes of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.","authors":"Tychique T Wasolua, Morgan S Hardy, Tanner J Bommersbach, Roger S McIntyre, Taeho Greg Rhee","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately 30-40% of patients with major depressive disorder fail to respond to conventional antidepressants. Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly used in maintenance protocols extending months to years, yet synthesized data on cumulative safety remain limited. This systematic review evaluated long-term safety of both agents with follow-up ≥12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched via OVID from inception through January 29, 2026. Eligible studies enrolled adults with depressive disorders receiving ketamine or esketamine with ≥12-week follow-up and extractable safety data. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I v2 (nonrandomized studies). Safety outcomes were synthesized narratively across nine domains: neurocognitive, dissociative/psychotomimetic, sedation, cardiovascular, hepatic, urinary, misuse/dependence, suicidality, and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies (11 RCTs, 21 nonrandomized) met inclusion criteria, with follow-up ranging from 3 months to 9 years. Across cardiovascular, hepatic, and urinary domains, neither racemic ketamine nor intranasal esketamine demonstrated evidence of cumulative organ toxicity during maintenance treatment. Dissociative and sedative effects were common but consistently transient, resolving within 1-2 h of administration. No treatment-emergent neurocognitive dysfunction was identified; urologic complications were rare and resolved with treatment discontinuation. No cases of iatrogenic addiction, drug-seeking, or withdrawal were documented for either formulation. Suicidal ideation scores showed reductions from baseline, though suicide attempts and completions occurred during follow-up periods. SAEs attributable to treatment were rare. The comparative analyses suggested essentially equivalent long-term safety profiles between racemic ketamine and intranasal esketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over follow-up durations typically ranging from 3 to 12 months, current evidence supports the safety of ketamine and esketamine for TRD, with no cumulative organ toxicity or iatrogenic addiction during maintenance treatment. Acute effects remain transient and manageable. However, findings are limited by heterogeneity in safety monitoring across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 30-40% of patients with major depressive disorder fail to respond to conventional antidepressants. Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly used in maintenance protocols extending months to years, yet synthesized data on cumulative safety remain limited. This systematic review evaluated long-term safety of both agents with follow-up ≥12 weeks.

Methods: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched via OVID from inception through January 29, 2026. Eligible studies enrolled adults with depressive disorders receiving ketamine or esketamine with ≥12-week follow-up and extractable safety data. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I v2 (nonrandomized studies). Safety outcomes were synthesized narratively across nine domains: neurocognitive, dissociative/psychotomimetic, sedation, cardiovascular, hepatic, urinary, misuse/dependence, suicidality, and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: Thirty-two studies (11 RCTs, 21 nonrandomized) met inclusion criteria, with follow-up ranging from 3 months to 9 years. Across cardiovascular, hepatic, and urinary domains, neither racemic ketamine nor intranasal esketamine demonstrated evidence of cumulative organ toxicity during maintenance treatment. Dissociative and sedative effects were common but consistently transient, resolving within 1-2 h of administration. No treatment-emergent neurocognitive dysfunction was identified; urologic complications were rare and resolved with treatment discontinuation. No cases of iatrogenic addiction, drug-seeking, or withdrawal were documented for either formulation. Suicidal ideation scores showed reductions from baseline, though suicide attempts and completions occurred during follow-up periods. SAEs attributable to treatment were rare. The comparative analyses suggested essentially equivalent long-term safety profiles between racemic ketamine and intranasal esketamine.

Conclusion: Over follow-up durations typically ranging from 3 to 12 months, current evidence supports the safety of ketamine and esketamine for TRD, with no cumulative organ toxicity or iatrogenic addiction during maintenance treatment. Acute effects remain transient and manageable. However, findings are limited by heterogeneity in safety monitoring across studies.

氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症患者长期安全性的系统评价。
大约30-40%的重度抑郁症患者对常规抗抑郁药无效。氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮的使用越来越多,但有关累积安全性的综合数据仍然有限。本系统综述评估了这两种药物的长期安全性。方法:检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase和Cochrane图书馆自成立至2026年1月29日的文献。符合条件的研究纳入了接受氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮治疗的抑郁症患者,随访≥12周。安全性结果综合叙述了九个领域:神经认知、解离/拟精神、镇静、心血管、肝脏、泌尿、滥用/依赖、自杀和严重不良事件(SAEs)。评估偏倚风险。结果:32项研究(11项rct, 21项非随机)符合纳入标准,随访时间从3个月到9年不等。在心血管、肝脏和泌尿系统,外消旋氯胺酮和鼻用艾氯胺酮在维持治疗期间均未表现出累积器官毒性。解离和镇静作用是常见的,但一直是短暂的,在给药1-2小时内消退。未发现治疗引起的神经认知功能障碍;泌尿系统的并发症是罕见的,并解决了治疗停止。两种制剂均无医源性成瘾、觅药或戒断记录。自杀意念得分较基线有所下降,尽管在随访期间发生了自杀企图和自杀未遂。可归因于治疗的SAEs非常罕见。比较分析表明外消旋氯胺酮和鼻用艾氯胺酮的长期安全性基本相同。结论:目前的证据支持氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗TRD的安全性,在维持治疗期间没有累积的器官毒性或医源性成瘾。急性影响仍然是短暂的和可控的。然而,研究结果受到跨研究安全监测异质性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书