Viral PDZ target sequences are not inherently more promiscuous than those derived from endogenous target proteins.

IF 5.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Protein Science Pub Date : 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pro.70772
Cole D Masuga, Caroline Ceravolo, Elise F Tahti, Daniel A Pollard, Jeanine F Amacher
{"title":"Viral PDZ target sequences are not inherently more promiscuous than those derived from endogenous target proteins.","authors":"Cole D Masuga, Caroline Ceravolo, Elise F Tahti, Daniel A Pollard, Jeanine F Amacher","doi":"10.1002/pro.70772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PDZ domains are one of the largest families of short linear motif (or peptide) binding domains in the human proteome. These scaffolding domains are important in signaling and trafficking pathways, such as in the formation of tight junctions or in the postsynaptic density of neurons. PDZ domains are also targeted by several pathogenic viral proteins, including human papillomavirus (HPV), influenza, hepatitis, rabies, coronaviruses, among others. Previously, we investigated the specificity determinants of modulator, or non-motif, residues for two PDZ binding motifs (or PBMs) from the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and HPV16 E6 proteins to better understand differences in relative promiscuity between these similar sequences. To test whether viral PDZ-binding motifs are inherently more promiscuous than endogenous targets, we measured binding affinities for 7 endogenous and 7 viral PBMs across 8 well-studied Class I PDZ domains. Fluorescence anisotropy assays revealed no significant difference in relative binding affinities between viral and endogenous PBMs, indicating that viral versus endogenous origin alone does not explain PBM promiscuity. Our results were consistent with available data from high throughput holdup assays. Taken together, our data support previously reported sequence hotspots, whereby certain PBMs are recognized by large numbers of PDZ domains, likely due to a combination of widely favorable modulator residues.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"35 9","pages":"e70772"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13493693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PDZ domains are one of the largest families of short linear motif (or peptide) binding domains in the human proteome. These scaffolding domains are important in signaling and trafficking pathways, such as in the formation of tight junctions or in the postsynaptic density of neurons. PDZ domains are also targeted by several pathogenic viral proteins, including human papillomavirus (HPV), influenza, hepatitis, rabies, coronaviruses, among others. Previously, we investigated the specificity determinants of modulator, or non-motif, residues for two PDZ binding motifs (or PBMs) from the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and HPV16 E6 proteins to better understand differences in relative promiscuity between these similar sequences. To test whether viral PDZ-binding motifs are inherently more promiscuous than endogenous targets, we measured binding affinities for 7 endogenous and 7 viral PBMs across 8 well-studied Class I PDZ domains. Fluorescence anisotropy assays revealed no significant difference in relative binding affinities between viral and endogenous PBMs, indicating that viral versus endogenous origin alone does not explain PBM promiscuity. Our results were consistent with available data from high throughput holdup assays. Taken together, our data support previously reported sequence hotspots, whereby certain PBMs are recognized by large numbers of PDZ domains, likely due to a combination of widely favorable modulator residues.

病毒PDZ靶序列本身并不比内源性靶蛋白衍生的序列更具混杂性。
PDZ结构域是人类蛋白质组中最大的短线性基序(或肽)结合结构域家族之一。这些支架结构域在信号传导和运输途径中很重要,例如在紧密连接的形成或神经元的突触后密度中。PDZ结构域也是几种致病性病毒蛋白的靶点,包括人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、流感、肝炎、狂犬病、冠状病毒等。之前,我们研究了囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)和HPV16 E6蛋白中两个PDZ结合基序(PBMs)的调节基或非基序残基的特异性决定因素,以更好地了解这些相似序列之间相对乱交的差异。为了测试病毒PDZ结合基序是否天生比内源性靶标更混杂,我们测量了7种内源性和7种病毒PBMs在8个已被充分研究的I类PDZ结构域的结合亲和力。荧光各向异性分析显示,病毒和内源性PBM之间的相对结合亲和力没有显著差异,表明病毒与内源性来源单独并不能解释PBM的混杂性。我们的结果与高通量含率分析的可用数据一致。综上所述,我们的数据支持先前报道的序列热点,即某些PBMs被大量PDZ结构域识别,可能是由于广泛有利的调制残基的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Protein Science
Protein Science 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution. Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics. The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication. Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书