Examining the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) Moderate Risk Cannabis Use Threshold Among a Sample of U.S. Military Veterans with Chronic Pain Who Report Medical Cannabis Use.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel Schriemer, Travis I Lovejoy, Natassja Pal, Steven K Dobscha, Benjamin J Morasco
{"title":"Examining the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) Moderate Risk Cannabis Use Threshold Among a Sample of U.S. Military Veterans with Chronic Pain Who Report Medical Cannabis Use.","authors":"Daniel Schriemer, Travis I Lovejoy, Natassja Pal, Steven K Dobscha, Benjamin J Morasco","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2026.2715771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) is widely used for substance use screening. However, its established risk cutoffs may not be appropriate for people who use cannabis for medical reasons. This study sought to determine an optimal moderate-risk cannabis use cutoff for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 501 U.S. military veterans who reported using cannabis for medical reasons and were prescribed long-term opioid therapy were administered the ASSIST and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared the performance of the ASSIST to the CUDIT-R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The currently recommended cutoff of 4 demonstrated poor performance (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 52.8). A cutoff of 7 maximized AUC (66.2). However, this cutoff resulted in low sensitivity (59.9). A cutoff of 6 improved sensitivity (94.7), with a reduced AUC of 59.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among this population, raising the ASSIST cutoff to 7 to detect moderate cannabis risk may be appropriate for ongoing patient monitoring, while a cutoff of 6 may be preferable for screening. However, there remain significant problems with the ASSIST as a measure for detecting risk for cannabis-related harms among this population. Development of population-specific screening tools is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2715771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) is widely used for substance use screening. However, its established risk cutoffs may not be appropriate for people who use cannabis for medical reasons. This study sought to determine an optimal moderate-risk cannabis use cutoff for this population.

Methods: A sample of 501 U.S. military veterans who reported using cannabis for medical reasons and were prescribed long-term opioid therapy were administered the ASSIST and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared the performance of the ASSIST to the CUDIT-R.

Results: The currently recommended cutoff of 4 demonstrated poor performance (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 52.8). A cutoff of 7 maximized AUC (66.2). However, this cutoff resulted in low sensitivity (59.9). A cutoff of 6 improved sensitivity (94.7), with a reduced AUC of 59.8.

Conclusions: Among this population, raising the ASSIST cutoff to 7 to detect moderate cannabis risk may be appropriate for ongoing patient monitoring, while a cutoff of 6 may be preferable for screening. However, there remain significant problems with the ASSIST as a measure for detecting risk for cannabis-related harms among this population. Development of population-specific screening tools is needed.

在报告医用大麻使用的美国慢性疼痛退伍军人样本中检查酒精,吸烟和物质介入筛选试验(ASSIST)中度风险大麻使用阈值。
背景:酒精、吸烟和物质介入筛查试验(ASSIST)被广泛用于物质使用筛查。然而,其确定的风险界限可能不适合出于医疗原因使用大麻的人。本研究旨在确定这一人群的最佳中等风险大麻使用截止时间。方法:对501名报告因医疗原因使用大麻并接受长期阿片类药物治疗的美国退伍军人进行ASSIST和大麻使用障碍识别测试-修订(CUDIT-R)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较ASSIST与CUDIT-R的性能。结果:目前推荐的4个截点表现不佳(曲线下面积[AUC] = 52.8)。7的截止值使AUC最大化(66.2)。然而,这一截断导致了较低的灵敏度(59.9)。6的截止值提高了灵敏度(94.7),AUC降低了59.8。结论:在这一人群中,将ASSIST临界值提高到7来检测中度大麻风险可能适合于持续的患者监测,而将临界值提高到6可能更适合于筛查。然而,ASSIST作为检测这一人群中大麻相关危害风险的措施仍然存在重大问题。需要开发针对特定人群的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书