Co-designing opioid stewardship guidelines for cancer pain management in Nepal: study protocol.

IF 1.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sunil Shrestha, Nabin Pathak, Rajeev Shrestha, Subhas Pandit, Vibhu Paudyal, Simit Sapkota
{"title":"Co-designing opioid stewardship guidelines for cancer pain management in Nepal: study protocol.","authors":"Sunil Shrestha, Nabin Pathak, Rajeev Shrestha, Subhas Pandit, Vibhu Paudyal, Simit Sapkota","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2713525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer pain remains inadequately managed in low-resource settings such as Nepal, where regulatory barriers, stigma, limited opioid availability, and insufficient clinical training hinder effective treatment. Although opioids are essential for moderate to severe cancer pain, concerns regarding misuse and weak system-level governance restrict rational access, contributing to avoidable suffering and health inequities. The Pilot Initiative for Local Opioid Treatment (PILOT) study aims to co-design, pilot, and evaluate a contextually appropriate opioid stewardship framework to strengthen cancer pain management in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-phase, participatory mixed-methods study comprises six phases. Phase I involves a systematic scoping review of opioid stewardship models in comparable low-resource settings. Phase II engages key stakeholders, including oncologists, pharmacists, nurses, palliative care providers, policymakers, patients, and caregivers, through focus group discussions (<i>n</i> = 40-50) and key informant interviews (<i>n</i> = 15-20) across urban and rural oncology settings in three provinces. Phase III is a three-round modified e-Delphi consensus process involving approximately 20-25 national and international experts, using anonymous, iterative feedback to systematically build consensus on guideline components. Phase IV convenes an in-person national guideline development workshop bringing together over 40 stakeholders to translate the consensus framework into operational recommendations. Phase V involves a 12-week pilot implementation across at least one and up to three cancer care facilities, with Kathmandu Cancer Center serving as the primary site. Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, adoption, and fidelity of the stewardship guidelines. Phase VI involves iterative refinement of the guidelines based on pilot findings and preparation for national dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2713525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer pain remains inadequately managed in low-resource settings such as Nepal, where regulatory barriers, stigma, limited opioid availability, and insufficient clinical training hinder effective treatment. Although opioids are essential for moderate to severe cancer pain, concerns regarding misuse and weak system-level governance restrict rational access, contributing to avoidable suffering and health inequities. The Pilot Initiative for Local Opioid Treatment (PILOT) study aims to co-design, pilot, and evaluate a contextually appropriate opioid stewardship framework to strengthen cancer pain management in Nepal.

Methods: This multi-phase, participatory mixed-methods study comprises six phases. Phase I involves a systematic scoping review of opioid stewardship models in comparable low-resource settings. Phase II engages key stakeholders, including oncologists, pharmacists, nurses, palliative care providers, policymakers, patients, and caregivers, through focus group discussions (n = 40-50) and key informant interviews (n = 15-20) across urban and rural oncology settings in three provinces. Phase III is a three-round modified e-Delphi consensus process involving approximately 20-25 national and international experts, using anonymous, iterative feedback to systematically build consensus on guideline components. Phase IV convenes an in-person national guideline development workshop bringing together over 40 stakeholders to translate the consensus framework into operational recommendations. Phase V involves a 12-week pilot implementation across at least one and up to three cancer care facilities, with Kathmandu Cancer Center serving as the primary site. Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, adoption, and fidelity of the stewardship guidelines. Phase VI involves iterative refinement of the guidelines based on pilot findings and preparation for national dissemination.

共同设计阿片类药物管理指南在尼泊尔癌症疼痛管理:研究方案。
在尼泊尔等资源匮乏的环境中,癌症疼痛仍然得不到充分管理,监管障碍、耻辱感、阿片类药物供应有限和临床培训不足阻碍了有效治疗。虽然阿片类药物对中度至重度癌症疼痛至关重要,但对滥用和系统级治理薄弱的担忧限制了合理获取,导致了本可避免的痛苦和卫生不公平。当地阿片类药物治疗试点倡议(Pilot)研究旨在共同设计、试点和评估一个适合具体情况的阿片类药物管理框架,以加强尼泊尔的癌症疼痛管理。方法:该多阶段、参与式混合方法研究包括六个阶段。第一阶段涉及在可比较的低资源环境中对阿片类药物管理模式进行系统的范围审查。第二阶段通过焦点小组讨论(n = 40-50)和关键信息提供者访谈(n = 15-20),在三个省份的城市和农村肿瘤学环境中吸引主要利益相关者,包括肿瘤学家、药剂师、护士、姑息治疗提供者、政策制定者、患者和护理人员。第三阶段是三轮修改后的e-Delphi共识过程,涉及大约20-25名国内和国际专家,使用匿名、迭代反馈系统地就指南组成部分建立共识。第四阶段召开了一次面对面的国家指南制定研讨会,汇集了40多个利益攸关方,将共识框架转化为可操作的建议。第五阶段包括为期12周的试点实施,在至少一到三家癌症护理机构中实施,加德满都癌症中心作为主要地点。主要结果包括管理指导方针的可行性、可接受性、采用率和保真度。第六阶段涉及根据试点结果不断改进准则,并准备在全国传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书