Automated deep learning-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of meningiomas.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s00234-026-04152-z
Daniel de Wilde, Olivier Zanier, Aron Alakmeh, Stefanos Voglis, Ulf C Schneider, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E Staartjes, Gustav Burström, Raffaele Da Mutten
{"title":"Automated deep learning-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of meningiomas.","authors":"Daniel de Wilde, Olivier Zanier, Aron Alakmeh, Stefanos Voglis, Ulf C Schneider, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E Staartjes, Gustav Burström, Raffaele Da Mutten","doi":"10.1007/s00234-026-04152-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and are frequently monitored over extended periods. Volumetric assessment typically requires manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and associated with interrater variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based model for the automated segmentation of meningiomas and associated peritumoral edema on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We trained a standard nnU-Net deep learning model on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR MRI scans from 100 patients treated at the University Hospital of Zurich. The model was then externally validated on 88 cases from the meningioma SEG-Class dataset from the Cancer Imaging Archive. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved mean Dice scores of 0.87 ± 0.23 for meningioma segmentation and 0.63 ± 0.38 for peritumoral edema in internal cross-validation. On the external validation set, the model achieved scores of 0.86 ± 0.17 for meningioma segmentation and 0.31 ± 0.35 for edema.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting meningiomas and modest performance for peritumoral edema. These results support the potential utility of automated segmentation tools in clinical workflows. Future work should focus on validating model performance across larger multi-center datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"2917-2926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13680523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-04152-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and are frequently monitored over extended periods. Volumetric assessment typically requires manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and associated with interrater variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based model for the automated segmentation of meningiomas and associated peritumoral edema on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: We trained a standard nnU-Net deep learning model on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR MRI scans from 100 patients treated at the University Hospital of Zurich. The model was then externally validated on 88 cases from the meningioma SEG-Class dataset from the Cancer Imaging Archive. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance.

Results: The model achieved mean Dice scores of 0.87 ± 0.23 for meningioma segmentation and 0.63 ± 0.38 for peritumoral edema in internal cross-validation. On the external validation set, the model achieved scores of 0.86 ± 0.17 for meningioma segmentation and 0.31 ± 0.35 for edema.

Conclusion: The deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting meningiomas and modest performance for peritumoral edema. These results support the potential utility of automated segmentation tools in clinical workflows. Future work should focus on validating model performance across larger multi-center datasets.

基于深度学习的脑膜瘤自动分割和体积分析。
脑膜瘤是最常见的原发性颅内肿瘤,通常需要长时间监测。容量评估通常需要手动分割,这是耗时的,并且与水元间的可变性有关。本研究旨在开发和验证一种基于深度学习的模型,用于脑膜瘤和相关瘤周水肿的术前磁共振成像(MRI)自动分割。方法:我们在苏黎世大学医院接受治疗的100例患者的对比增强t1加权和FLAIR MRI扫描上训练了一个标准的nnU-Net深度学习模型。然后对来自癌症影像档案的88例脑膜瘤SEG-Class数据集的模型进行外部验证。使用Dice相似系数、Jaccard指数和第95百分位Hausdorff距离来评估分割性能。结果:经内部交叉验证,该模型脑膜瘤分割的平均Dice评分为0.87±0.23,瘤周水肿的平均Dice评分为0.63±0.38。在外部验证集上,模型脑膜瘤分割得分为0.86±0.17分,水肿得分为0.31±0.35分。结论:深度学习模型对脑膜瘤的分割精度较高,对瘤周水肿的分割精度一般。这些结果支持了自动分割工具在临床工作流程中的潜在效用。未来的工作应该集中在验证模型在更大的多中心数据集上的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书