Collaborative object handling supports autobiographical recall in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2026.2719610
Claire Maussire, Mohamad El Haj, Etienne Emmelin, Jérémy Besnard
{"title":"Collaborative object handling supports autobiographical recall in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Claire Maussire, Mohamad El Haj, Etienne Emmelin, Jérémy Besnard","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2719610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autobiographical memory is impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly episodic richness and phenomenological detail. Grounded in embodied cognition, this study examined whether collaborative object handling, combining sensorimotor and social interaction, could support autobiographical recall in AD. We recruited 22 patients with mild-to-moderate AD and 20 matched older controls to complete two autobiographical memory conditions in a within-subject design: a condition involving autobiographical recall without objects and a condition involving autobiographical recall supported by collaboratively handling objects. Participants recalled four autobiographical memories, with two memories in the autobiographical recall without objects condition and two in the collaborative object handling condition. Memories were scored for autobiographical richness, event specificity, spatiotemporal anchoring, phenomenological details, long-term recall after 15 min, latency to memory recall, and number of prompts before memory recall. Across both participant groups (AD patients and controls), collaborative object handling increased phenomenological richness, reduced event specificity, and facilitated memory access, as shown by shorter retrieval latencies and fewer prompts. AD patients showed lower overall autobiographical richness, spatiotemporal anchoring, phenomenological richness, and long-term recall than controls. These findings suggest that collaborative object handling may facilitate autobiographical recall in AD by enhancing phenomenological richness and memory accessibility, supporting embodied and socially supported reminiscence approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1118-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2719610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autobiographical memory is impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly episodic richness and phenomenological detail. Grounded in embodied cognition, this study examined whether collaborative object handling, combining sensorimotor and social interaction, could support autobiographical recall in AD. We recruited 22 patients with mild-to-moderate AD and 20 matched older controls to complete two autobiographical memory conditions in a within-subject design: a condition involving autobiographical recall without objects and a condition involving autobiographical recall supported by collaboratively handling objects. Participants recalled four autobiographical memories, with two memories in the autobiographical recall without objects condition and two in the collaborative object handling condition. Memories were scored for autobiographical richness, event specificity, spatiotemporal anchoring, phenomenological details, long-term recall after 15 min, latency to memory recall, and number of prompts before memory recall. Across both participant groups (AD patients and controls), collaborative object handling increased phenomenological richness, reduced event specificity, and facilitated memory access, as shown by shorter retrieval latencies and fewer prompts. AD patients showed lower overall autobiographical richness, spatiotemporal anchoring, phenomenological richness, and long-term recall than controls. These findings suggest that collaborative object handling may facilitate autobiographical recall in AD by enhancing phenomenological richness and memory accessibility, supporting embodied and socially supported reminiscence approaches.

协作对象处理支持阿尔茨海默病的自传式回忆。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的自传式记忆受损,尤其是情景丰富性和现象学细节。本研究以具身认知为基础,考察了协同对象处理,结合感觉运动和社会互动,是否能支持AD患者的自传式回忆。我们招募了22名轻度至中度阿尔茨海默症患者和20名匹配的老年对照者,在受试者内设计中完成两种自传体记忆条件:一种是没有物体的自传体回忆,另一种是协作处理物体支持的自传体回忆。被试回忆了四段自传体记忆,其中两段是在无客体自传体记忆条件下回忆的,两段是在协同客体处理条件下回忆的。对自传体丰富性、事件特异性、时空锚定、现象学细节、15分钟后长期回忆、记忆回忆潜伏期和记忆回忆前提示次数进行评分。在两组参与者(AD患者和对照组)中,协作对象处理增加了现象丰富性,降低了事件特异性,并促进了记忆访问,表现为更短的检索延迟和更少的提示。AD患者的总体自传体丰富性、时空锚定、现象学丰富性和长期回忆均低于对照组。这些研究结果表明,协作对象处理可能通过增强现象学丰富性和记忆可及性来促进AD患者的自传式回忆,支持具身和社会支持的回忆方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书