Who benefits most? Exploring age effects of episodic future thinking and enactment encoding on prospective memory from childhood to middle adulthood.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-21 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2026.2719615
Steven Stelz, Antonina Pereira, Mareike Altgassen
{"title":"Who benefits most? Exploring age effects of episodic future thinking and enactment encoding on prospective memory from childhood to middle adulthood.","authors":"Steven Stelz, Antonina Pereira, Mareike Altgassen","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2719615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Failures to realise delayed intentions (prospective memory, PM) are common in everyday life, yet little is known about how PM performance can be improved. Deeper encoding during intention formation has been proposed to strengthen memory representations and facilitate later retrieval; however, no study has systematically compared different encoding strategies from childhood to middle adulthood. To address this gap, we examined the effects of two encoding strategies - episodic future thinking (EFT; mental practice) and enactment encoding (EE; physical practice) - on PM performance across four age groups. A total of 373 participants were tested, including children (<i>n</i> = 90), adolescents (<i>n</i> = 96), young adults (<i>n</i> = 97), and middle-aged adults (<i>n</i> = 90). Participants were randomly assigned to an EFT, EE, or standard encoding condition and completed a novel computerised PM task. A significant main effect of encoding condition emerged. Overall, participants in the EE condition outperformed those in both the EFT and standard encoding conditions, with no evidence that this benefit differed by age group. Contrary to expectations, EFT did not improve PM performance relative to standard encoding. This unexpected finding is discussed in terms of cue focality and high ongoing task demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1166-1183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2719615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failures to realise delayed intentions (prospective memory, PM) are common in everyday life, yet little is known about how PM performance can be improved. Deeper encoding during intention formation has been proposed to strengthen memory representations and facilitate later retrieval; however, no study has systematically compared different encoding strategies from childhood to middle adulthood. To address this gap, we examined the effects of two encoding strategies - episodic future thinking (EFT; mental practice) and enactment encoding (EE; physical practice) - on PM performance across four age groups. A total of 373 participants were tested, including children (n = 90), adolescents (n = 96), young adults (n = 97), and middle-aged adults (n = 90). Participants were randomly assigned to an EFT, EE, or standard encoding condition and completed a novel computerised PM task. A significant main effect of encoding condition emerged. Overall, participants in the EE condition outperformed those in both the EFT and standard encoding conditions, with no evidence that this benefit differed by age group. Contrary to expectations, EFT did not improve PM performance relative to standard encoding. This unexpected finding is discussed in terms of cue focality and high ongoing task demands.

谁是最大的受益者?探讨情景未来思维和情景编码对童年至中年前瞻记忆的年龄影响。
未能意识到延迟的意图(前瞻记忆,PM)在日常生活中很常见,但很少有人知道如何提高PM的表现。在意向形成过程中,更深层次的编码被提出以加强记忆表征和促进以后的检索;然而,没有研究系统地比较不同的编码策略从童年到成年中期。为了解决这一差距,我们研究了两种编码策略-情景未来思维(EFT;心理练习)和制定编码(EE;身体练习)-对四个年龄组PM表现的影响。共有373名参与者接受了测试,包括儿童(n = 90)、青少年(n = 96)、年轻人(n = 97)和中年人(n = 90)。参与者被随机分配到EFT、EE或标准编码条件下,并完成一项新的计算机化PM任务。编码条件的主效应显著。总体而言,情感表达条件下的参与者表现优于EFT和标准编码条件下的参与者,没有证据表明这种益处因年龄组而异。与预期相反,相对于标准编码,EFT并没有提高PM的性能。这一意想不到的发现在线索聚焦和高持续任务需求方面进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书