Microbiome analysis and epigenetic patterns revealed distinct differences between two elm species with contrasting Dutch elm disease resistance.

IF 14.9 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Hans Hoenicka, Kristina Ulrich, Charlotte Haffner, Marta Starczak, Daniel Gackowski, Ben Bubner, Andreas Ulrich
{"title":"Microbiome analysis and epigenetic patterns revealed distinct differences between two elm species with contrasting Dutch elm disease resistance.","authors":"Hans Hoenicka, Kristina Ulrich, Charlotte Haffner, Marta Starczak, Daniel Gackowski, Ben Bubner, Andreas Ulrich","doi":"10.1186/s40168-026-02488-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dutch elm disease (DED), caused by the fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi, has devastated elm species in Europe and North America for over a century. While the Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia) frequently displays notable resistance to DED, the European wych elm (Ulmus glabra) remains highly susceptible. Understanding microbiome interaction and epigenetic factors might help to explain this contrasting resilience and subsequently improve disease management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seedlings of both elm species were germinated and maintained under identical environmental conditions. Comparative metabarcoding revealed distinct differences in bacterial and eukaryotic microbiomes, as well as in their associations with lichenized fungi and their photobiont algae. In U. parvifolia, 24 eukaryotic and 14 bacterial taxa were identified as the most differentially abundant microbiome components, and exhibited significantly different levels compared to U. glabra. In particular, Leotiomycetes fungi and Rhizobiales bacteria, both previously implicated in resistance to pathogens, were strongly enriched in U. parvifolia. Lichenized fungi and chlorophyte algae were likewise more abundant in U. parvifolia. In U. glabra, 11 eukaryotic and 16 bacterial taxa were significantly more abundant, including Nocardioides bacteria and Leptospora fungi. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry revealed that, compared to U. glabra, U. parvifolia exhibited higher levels of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2'-deoxycytidine and lower levels of 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine and N6-methyl-2'-deoxyadenosine in DNA, as well as increased amounts of 5-methylcytidine, N6-methyladenosine, and 5-hydroxymethyluridine in RNA. The elevated levels of well-established epigenetic markers in DNA and RNA are remarkable. However, it remains unclear what part of the holobiont may be responsible for this effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The contrasting susceptibility of Chinese and European elms to DED correlates with pronounced differences in their associated microbial communities and lichens, as well as in patterns of epigenetic nucleoside modifications. In particular, the enrichment of specific stress-associated microbiome components, together with lichen associations and elevated levels of modified DNA and RNA nucleosides in U. parvifolia, may underlie its increased tolerance to DED. Although this study did not identify the factors responsible for DED resistance, it provides valuable insights into microbiomic and epigenetic features that could contribute to the development of new approaches to combat DED. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13488114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-026-02488-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dutch elm disease (DED), caused by the fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi, has devastated elm species in Europe and North America for over a century. While the Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia) frequently displays notable resistance to DED, the European wych elm (Ulmus glabra) remains highly susceptible. Understanding microbiome interaction and epigenetic factors might help to explain this contrasting resilience and subsequently improve disease management.

Results: Seedlings of both elm species were germinated and maintained under identical environmental conditions. Comparative metabarcoding revealed distinct differences in bacterial and eukaryotic microbiomes, as well as in their associations with lichenized fungi and their photobiont algae. In U. parvifolia, 24 eukaryotic and 14 bacterial taxa were identified as the most differentially abundant microbiome components, and exhibited significantly different levels compared to U. glabra. In particular, Leotiomycetes fungi and Rhizobiales bacteria, both previously implicated in resistance to pathogens, were strongly enriched in U. parvifolia. Lichenized fungi and chlorophyte algae were likewise more abundant in U. parvifolia. In U. glabra, 11 eukaryotic and 16 bacterial taxa were significantly more abundant, including Nocardioides bacteria and Leptospora fungi. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry revealed that, compared to U. glabra, U. parvifolia exhibited higher levels of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2'-deoxycytidine and lower levels of 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine and N6-methyl-2'-deoxyadenosine in DNA, as well as increased amounts of 5-methylcytidine, N6-methyladenosine, and 5-hydroxymethyluridine in RNA. The elevated levels of well-established epigenetic markers in DNA and RNA are remarkable. However, it remains unclear what part of the holobiont may be responsible for this effect.

Conclusions: The contrasting susceptibility of Chinese and European elms to DED correlates with pronounced differences in their associated microbial communities and lichens, as well as in patterns of epigenetic nucleoside modifications. In particular, the enrichment of specific stress-associated microbiome components, together with lichen associations and elevated levels of modified DNA and RNA nucleosides in U. parvifolia, may underlie its increased tolerance to DED. Although this study did not identify the factors responsible for DED resistance, it provides valuable insights into microbiomic and epigenetic features that could contribute to the development of new approaches to combat DED. Video Abstract.

微生物组分析和表观遗传模式揭示了两种榆树之间的明显差异,对比了荷兰榆树的抗病能力。
背景:荷兰榆树病(Dutch elm disease,简称DED)是一种由新榆木耳真菌引起的病害,已经在欧洲和北美肆虐了一个多世纪。虽然中国榆树(Ulmus parvifolia)经常表现出对DED的显著抗性,但欧洲榆树(Ulmus glabra)仍然高度易感。了解微生物组相互作用和表观遗传因素可能有助于解释这种对比的恢复能力,并随后改善疾病管理。结果:两种榆的幼苗在相同的环境条件下都能发芽和维持。比较元条形码揭示了细菌和真核生物微生物组的明显差异,以及它们与地衣真菌及其光生物藻类的关联。在细叶橐吾中,鉴定出24个真核生物类群和14个细菌类群是差异最大的微生物组组分,与光叶橐吾相比差异显著。特别是,以前与病原体抗性有关的利多菌属真菌和根瘤菌属细菌在小叶参中富集。地衣真菌和绿藻在小叶藤中也同样丰富。其中,11个真核生物类群和16个细菌类群的丰度显著增加,包括Nocardioides细菌和Leptospora真菌。超高效液相色谱联用质谱分析结果表明,与光叶紫苏相比,细叶紫苏DNA中5-(羟甲基)-2′-脱氧胞苷含量较高,5-甲基-2′-脱氧胞苷和n6 -甲基-2′-脱氧腺苷含量较低,RNA中5-甲基胞苷、n6 -甲基腺苷和5-羟甲基尿苷含量较高。DNA和RNA中成熟的表观遗传标记水平的升高是显著的。然而,目前尚不清楚全息物的哪个部分可能导致这种效果。结论:中国榆树和欧洲榆树对DED的不同易感性与其相关的微生物群落和地衣以及表观遗传核苷修饰模式的显著差异有关。特别是,特定应激相关微生物组成分的富集,以及地衣关联和修饰DNA和RNA核苷水平的升高,可能是其对DED耐受性增强的基础。虽然这项研究没有确定导致DED耐药的因素,但它为微生物组和表观遗传特征提供了有价值的见解,这可能有助于开发对抗DED的新方法。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书