Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window: a non-randomized trial with preliminary findings.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jing Wang, Dexiang Liu, Birong Chen, Hongxia Zhao
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window: a non-randomized trial with preliminary findings.","authors":"Jing Wang, Dexiang Liu, Birong Chen, Hongxia Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s11239-026-03388-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window (6-24 h) without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion remain uncertain. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in this population. This single-center, retrospective, non-randomized study enrolled 229 patients. The tirofiban group (n = 114) received low-dose tirofiban (0.1 µg/kg/min for 24 h) followed by DAPT, while the control group (n = 115) received DAPT alone. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) balanced baseline covariates. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90 days), NIHSS improvement (≥ 3 points from baseline to 72 h) and early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes included bleeding and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Sensitivity analyses and E-values were calculated. After IPTW, all baseline covariates achieved excellent balance (all SMDs < 0.1). The primary outcome showed no significant difference between groups (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.12-1.38, P = 0.151). However, tirofiban was associated with significantly higher odds of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.07-3.77, P = 0.031) and NIHSS improvement (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.42-4.66, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in END, bleeding, or sICH. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of tirofiban's benefit for both outcomes, with E-values of 4.58 and 3.43, respectively. Low-dose tirofiban combined with DAPT significantly improved early neurological recovery and excellent functional outcome without increasing bleeding or sICH risk. Although the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance, consistent sensitivity analyses support the clinical value of tirofiban. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-026-03388-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window (6-24 h) without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion remain uncertain. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in this population. This single-center, retrospective, non-randomized study enrolled 229 patients. The tirofiban group (n = 114) received low-dose tirofiban (0.1 µg/kg/min for 24 h) followed by DAPT, while the control group (n = 115) received DAPT alone. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) balanced baseline covariates. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90 days), NIHSS improvement (≥ 3 points from baseline to 72 h) and early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes included bleeding and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Sensitivity analyses and E-values were calculated. After IPTW, all baseline covariates achieved excellent balance (all SMDs < 0.1). The primary outcome showed no significant difference between groups (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.12-1.38, P = 0.151). However, tirofiban was associated with significantly higher odds of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.07-3.77, P = 0.031) and NIHSS improvement (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.42-4.66, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in END, bleeding, or sICH. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of tirofiban's benefit for both outcomes, with E-values of 4.58 and 3.43, respectively. Low-dose tirofiban combined with DAPT significantly improved early neurological recovery and excellent functional outcome without increasing bleeding or sICH risk. Although the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance, consistent sensitivity analyses support the clinical value of tirofiban. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted.

低剂量替罗非班联合双重抗血小板治疗溶栓窗后急性脑梗死的疗效和安全性:一项具有初步结果的非随机试验
急性脑梗死超过溶栓窗口(6-24小时),无大或中型血管闭塞的患者的最佳抗栓策略仍不确定。本研究评估了低剂量替罗非班联合双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在该人群中的有效性和安全性。这项单中心、回顾性、非随机研究纳入了229例患者。替罗非班组(n = 114)给予低剂量替罗非班(0.1µg/kg/min,持续24 h)后再给予DAPT治疗,对照组(n = 115)单独给予DAPT治疗。治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)平衡基线协变量。90天的主要结局是良好的功能结局(改良Rankin量表评分0-2)。次要结果包括良好的功能结果(90天mRS 0-1), NIHSS改善(从基线到72小时≥3分)和早期神经功能恶化(END)。安全结局包括出血和症状性颅内出血(siich)。计算敏感性分析和e值。在IPTW之后,所有基线协变量都达到了极好的平衡(所有SMDs)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书