Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window: a non-randomized trial with preliminary findings.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window: a non-randomized trial with preliminary findings.","authors":"Jing Wang, Dexiang Liu, Birong Chen, Hongxia Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s11239-026-03388-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window (6-24 h) without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion remain uncertain. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in this population. This single-center, retrospective, non-randomized study enrolled 229 patients. The tirofiban group (n = 114) received low-dose tirofiban (0.1 µg/kg/min for 24 h) followed by DAPT, while the control group (n = 115) received DAPT alone. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) balanced baseline covariates. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90 days), NIHSS improvement (≥ 3 points from baseline to 72 h) and early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes included bleeding and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Sensitivity analyses and E-values were calculated. After IPTW, all baseline covariates achieved excellent balance (all SMDs < 0.1). The primary outcome showed no significant difference between groups (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.12-1.38, P = 0.151). However, tirofiban was associated with significantly higher odds of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.07-3.77, P = 0.031) and NIHSS improvement (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.42-4.66, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in END, bleeding, or sICH. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of tirofiban's benefit for both outcomes, with E-values of 4.58 and 3.43, respectively. Low-dose tirofiban combined with DAPT significantly improved early neurological recovery and excellent functional outcome without increasing bleeding or sICH risk. Although the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance, consistent sensitivity analyses support the clinical value of tirofiban. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-026-03388-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window (6-24 h) without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion remain uncertain. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in this population. This single-center, retrospective, non-randomized study enrolled 229 patients. The tirofiban group (n = 114) received low-dose tirofiban (0.1 µg/kg/min for 24 h) followed by DAPT, while the control group (n = 115) received DAPT alone. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) balanced baseline covariates. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1 at 90 days), NIHSS improvement (≥ 3 points from baseline to 72 h) and early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes included bleeding and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Sensitivity analyses and E-values were calculated. After IPTW, all baseline covariates achieved excellent balance (all SMDs < 0.1). The primary outcome showed no significant difference between groups (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.12-1.38, P = 0.151). However, tirofiban was associated with significantly higher odds of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.07-3.77, P = 0.031) and NIHSS improvement (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.42-4.66, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in END, bleeding, or sICH. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of tirofiban's benefit for both outcomes, with E-values of 4.58 and 3.43, respectively. Low-dose tirofiban combined with DAPT significantly improved early neurological recovery and excellent functional outcome without increasing bleeding or sICH risk. Although the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance, consistent sensitivity analyses support the clinical value of tirofiban. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care.
The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.