{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Structural Biology in Nephrology: Powerful Scaffolds, Fragile Certainties.","authors":"Carmine Zoccali, Enrico Petretto, Giovambattista Capasso, Loreto Gesualdo, Francesca Mallamaci, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Francesco Pesce","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000001254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based protein structure prediction has rapidly entered nephrology, providing plausible atomic models for channels, transporters, receptors, and scaffolds that previously lacked structural information. AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold currently underpin mechanistic interpretations of inherited kidney diseases, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, cystinosis, and Alport syndrome, and support experimental design in cryo-electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. For nephrologists, this means that renal proteins no longer need to be treated as black boxes: Genetic, biochemical, and physiologic data can at present be mapped onto concrete 3-dimensional scaffolds. However, the apparent precision of AI models can be misleading. Renal proteins frequently fall within underrepresented classes, including multipass membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered scaffolds, and human-specific isoforms with shallow multiple sequence alignments, where confidence scores may not accurately reflect model reliability. Current predictors typically deliver static snapshots, whereas transporters, channels, and slit-diaphragm complexes function as dynamic ensembles embedded in specific lipid and macromolecular environments. Attempts to use AlphaFold directly for variant classification or to estimate changes in thermodynamic stability or function show only modest agreement with mutagenesis data, particularly for gain-of-function and dominant-negative alleles that depend on subtle conformational and interaction changes. Common pitfalls include overinterpreting oligomeric stoichiometry inferred from AlphaFold Multimer, reading too much into domain orientations with high predicted aligned error, and dismissing low-confidence regions as modeling failures rather than recognizing intrinsically disordered, potentially regulatory segments. Integrative approaches combining cryo-ET, crosslinking mass spectrometry, and molecular dynamics can mitigate these limitations but remain labor intensive and low throughput. An explainable, hypothesis-driven use of AI that treats predicted structures as working scaffolds to be cross-validated against imaging, biophysics, and functional assays offers the most reliable path toward a genuinely mechanistic nephrology and responsible clinical translation of AI-based structural insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000001254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based protein structure prediction has rapidly entered nephrology, providing plausible atomic models for channels, transporters, receptors, and scaffolds that previously lacked structural information. AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold currently underpin mechanistic interpretations of inherited kidney diseases, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, cystinosis, and Alport syndrome, and support experimental design in cryo-electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. For nephrologists, this means that renal proteins no longer need to be treated as black boxes: Genetic, biochemical, and physiologic data can at present be mapped onto concrete 3-dimensional scaffolds. However, the apparent precision of AI models can be misleading. Renal proteins frequently fall within underrepresented classes, including multipass membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered scaffolds, and human-specific isoforms with shallow multiple sequence alignments, where confidence scores may not accurately reflect model reliability. Current predictors typically deliver static snapshots, whereas transporters, channels, and slit-diaphragm complexes function as dynamic ensembles embedded in specific lipid and macromolecular environments. Attempts to use AlphaFold directly for variant classification or to estimate changes in thermodynamic stability or function show only modest agreement with mutagenesis data, particularly for gain-of-function and dominant-negative alleles that depend on subtle conformational and interaction changes. Common pitfalls include overinterpreting oligomeric stoichiometry inferred from AlphaFold Multimer, reading too much into domain orientations with high predicted aligned error, and dismissing low-confidence regions as modeling failures rather than recognizing intrinsically disordered, potentially regulatory segments. Integrative approaches combining cryo-ET, crosslinking mass spectrometry, and molecular dynamics can mitigate these limitations but remain labor intensive and low throughput. An explainable, hypothesis-driven use of AI that treats predicted structures as working scaffolds to be cross-validated against imaging, biophysics, and functional assays offers the most reliable path toward a genuinely mechanistic nephrology and responsible clinical translation of AI-based structural insights.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews.
Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication.
JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.