Dose-response characteristics of the Nordic hamstring exercise: Total impulse versus total repetitions.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2026.2717029
Ryoichi Ema, Koichiro Suizu, Toshiaki Soga, Ikumi Morikawa, Ryota Akagi
{"title":"Dose-response characteristics of the Nordic hamstring exercise: Total impulse versus total repetitions.","authors":"Ryoichi Ema, Koichiro Suizu, Toshiaki Soga, Ikumi Morikawa, Ryota Akagi","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2717029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We clarified the relationship between the bilateral Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) training volume and adaptation by incorporating total impulse, the time-integrated force across sessions. Twenty-one healthy males (42 legs) were randomly assigned to twice-weekly (TRA2), once-weekly (TRA1), or control groups for six weeks. NHE-specific (peak torque, break-point angle, eccentric torque) and non-specific outcomes (isometric torque, isotonic power, total work during fatigue task, jump height, muscle architecture and stiffness) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Dose-response relationships were examined using linear mixed models with total impulse as a continuous covariate, alongside group-based comparisons. Group-based analyses showed significant improvements in all NHE-specific measures in both training groups, with greater gains in TRA2 than in TRA1 (<i>d</i> = 0.50-0.77). Several non-specific variables showed similar improvements without group differences (e.g. isotonic power: <i>d</i> = -0.06). There were significant time × total impulse interactions across both NHE-specific and non-specific outcomes. Combined with group-based findings of a larger biceps femoris (BF) stiffness reduction in TRA1 than in TRA2, these results suggest a non-linear relationship between total impulse and BF stiffness changes. Our results demonstrated that total impulse was a superior metric for quantifying the dose-response relationship of the NHE training compared to total repetitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2794-2808"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2717029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We clarified the relationship between the bilateral Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) training volume and adaptation by incorporating total impulse, the time-integrated force across sessions. Twenty-one healthy males (42 legs) were randomly assigned to twice-weekly (TRA2), once-weekly (TRA1), or control groups for six weeks. NHE-specific (peak torque, break-point angle, eccentric torque) and non-specific outcomes (isometric torque, isotonic power, total work during fatigue task, jump height, muscle architecture and stiffness) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Dose-response relationships were examined using linear mixed models with total impulse as a continuous covariate, alongside group-based comparisons. Group-based analyses showed significant improvements in all NHE-specific measures in both training groups, with greater gains in TRA2 than in TRA1 (d = 0.50-0.77). Several non-specific variables showed similar improvements without group differences (e.g. isotonic power: d = -0.06). There were significant time × total impulse interactions across both NHE-specific and non-specific outcomes. Combined with group-based findings of a larger biceps femoris (BF) stiffness reduction in TRA1 than in TRA2, these results suggest a non-linear relationship between total impulse and BF stiffness changes. Our results demonstrated that total impulse was a superior metric for quantifying the dose-response relationship of the NHE training compared to total repetitions.

北欧腿筋运动的剂量-反应特征:总脉冲与总重复。
我们通过整合总冲量,即跨阶段的时间整合力,澄清了双边北欧腿筋运动(NHE)训练量与适应性之间的关系。21名健康男性(42条腿)被随机分配到每周两次(TRA2),每周一次(TRA1)或对照组,为期六周。在干预前和干预后评估nhe特异性(峰值扭矩、断点角、偏心扭矩)和非特异性结果(等距扭矩、等压功率、疲劳任务期间的总功、跳跃高度、肌肉结构和刚度)。使用以总冲量为连续协变量的线性混合模型以及基于组的比较来检查剂量-反应关系。基于组的分析显示,两个训练组的所有nhe特异性指标均有显著改善,TRA2的收益大于TRA1 (d = 0.50-0.77)。一些非特异性变量显示了类似的改善,没有组间差异(例如等渗功率:d = -0.06)。在nhe特异性和非特异性结果之间存在显著的时间×总脉冲相互作用。结合TRA1组比TRA2组股骨二头肌(BF)刚度降低更大的结果,这些结果表明总冲量和BF刚度变化之间存在非线性关系。我们的结果表明,与总重复次数相比,总脉冲是量化NHE训练剂量-反应关系的更好指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书