Ryoichi Ema, Koichiro Suizu, Toshiaki Soga, Ikumi Morikawa, Ryota Akagi
{"title":"Dose-response characteristics of the Nordic hamstring exercise: Total impulse versus total repetitions.","authors":"Ryoichi Ema, Koichiro Suizu, Toshiaki Soga, Ikumi Morikawa, Ryota Akagi","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2717029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We clarified the relationship between the bilateral Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) training volume and adaptation by incorporating total impulse, the time-integrated force across sessions. Twenty-one healthy males (42 legs) were randomly assigned to twice-weekly (TRA2), once-weekly (TRA1), or control groups for six weeks. NHE-specific (peak torque, break-point angle, eccentric torque) and non-specific outcomes (isometric torque, isotonic power, total work during fatigue task, jump height, muscle architecture and stiffness) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Dose-response relationships were examined using linear mixed models with total impulse as a continuous covariate, alongside group-based comparisons. Group-based analyses showed significant improvements in all NHE-specific measures in both training groups, with greater gains in TRA2 than in TRA1 (<i>d</i> = 0.50-0.77). Several non-specific variables showed similar improvements without group differences (e.g. isotonic power: <i>d</i> = -0.06). There were significant time × total impulse interactions across both NHE-specific and non-specific outcomes. Combined with group-based findings of a larger biceps femoris (BF) stiffness reduction in TRA1 than in TRA2, these results suggest a non-linear relationship between total impulse and BF stiffness changes. Our results demonstrated that total impulse was a superior metric for quantifying the dose-response relationship of the NHE training compared to total repetitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2794-2808"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2717029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We clarified the relationship between the bilateral Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) training volume and adaptation by incorporating total impulse, the time-integrated force across sessions. Twenty-one healthy males (42 legs) were randomly assigned to twice-weekly (TRA2), once-weekly (TRA1), or control groups for six weeks. NHE-specific (peak torque, break-point angle, eccentric torque) and non-specific outcomes (isometric torque, isotonic power, total work during fatigue task, jump height, muscle architecture and stiffness) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Dose-response relationships were examined using linear mixed models with total impulse as a continuous covariate, alongside group-based comparisons. Group-based analyses showed significant improvements in all NHE-specific measures in both training groups, with greater gains in TRA2 than in TRA1 (d = 0.50-0.77). Several non-specific variables showed similar improvements without group differences (e.g. isotonic power: d = -0.06). There were significant time × total impulse interactions across both NHE-specific and non-specific outcomes. Combined with group-based findings of a larger biceps femoris (BF) stiffness reduction in TRA1 than in TRA2, these results suggest a non-linear relationship between total impulse and BF stiffness changes. Our results demonstrated that total impulse was a superior metric for quantifying the dose-response relationship of the NHE training compared to total repetitions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.