International Perspectives on Contralateral C7 Transfer for Brachial Plexus Injuries.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
R Llewellyn Thomas, Chaia Geltser, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu
{"title":"International Perspectives on Contralateral C7 Transfer for Brachial Plexus Injuries.","authors":"R Llewellyn Thomas, Chaia Geltser, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu","doi":"10.1055/a-2943-3677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of contralateral C7 (CC7) transfer for brachial plexus injury (BPI) varies considerably across geographic regions and surgical specialties. This study aimed to investigate international variation in the adoption of CC7 transfer and identify factors associated with differences in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was distributed to an international cohort of brachial plexus surgeons to evaluate current use of CC7 transfer, training background, practice characteristics, and factors influencing clinical decision-making. Responses were analyzed according to geographic region and surgical specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 attending surgeons completed the survey, of whom 45.6% performed CC7 transfer. Adoption was highest in Asia and lower in Europe and the Americas. Reasons for non-use varied by region, with lack of prior exposure reported most frequently in North and South America, whereas lack of peer acceptance was more common in Europe. Adoption also varied by specialty, with use reported by 56% of orthopedic surgeons, 53% of hand surgeons, 40% of plastic surgeons, and 30% of neurosurgeons. Prior exposure to CC7 was strongly associated with its use, although 28% of surgeons with previous exposure did not perform the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial geographic and specialty-specific variation exists in the adoption of CC7 transfer. Practice patterns appear to be influenced by multiple factors, including prior exposure, perceived efficacy, peer culture, and local practice patterns. These findings provide insight into the international variation in CC7 adoption and support further investigation into the factors underlying both its use and non-use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2943-3677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of contralateral C7 (CC7) transfer for brachial plexus injury (BPI) varies considerably across geographic regions and surgical specialties. This study aimed to investigate international variation in the adoption of CC7 transfer and identify factors associated with differences in clinical practice.

Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to an international cohort of brachial plexus surgeons to evaluate current use of CC7 transfer, training background, practice characteristics, and factors influencing clinical decision-making. Responses were analyzed according to geographic region and surgical specialty.

Results: A total of 160 attending surgeons completed the survey, of whom 45.6% performed CC7 transfer. Adoption was highest in Asia and lower in Europe and the Americas. Reasons for non-use varied by region, with lack of prior exposure reported most frequently in North and South America, whereas lack of peer acceptance was more common in Europe. Adoption also varied by specialty, with use reported by 56% of orthopedic surgeons, 53% of hand surgeons, 40% of plastic surgeons, and 30% of neurosurgeons. Prior exposure to CC7 was strongly associated with its use, although 28% of surgeons with previous exposure did not perform the procedure.

Conclusion: Substantial geographic and specialty-specific variation exists in the adoption of CC7 transfer. Practice patterns appear to be influenced by multiple factors, including prior exposure, perceived efficacy, peer culture, and local practice patterns. These findings provide insight into the international variation in CC7 adoption and support further investigation into the factors underlying both its use and non-use.

臂丛神经损伤对侧C7转移的国际观点。
对侧C7 (CC7)转移治疗臂丛神经损伤(BPI)的方法因地理区域和外科专业的不同而有很大差异。本研究旨在调查CC7转移采用的国际差异,并确定与临床实践差异相关的因素。方法对国际臂丛外科医生进行问卷调查,评估CC7移植的使用现状、培训背景、实践特点及影响临床决策的因素。根据地理区域和外科专科对反应进行分析。结果共160名主治医师完成调查,其中45.6%实施了CC7转移。亚洲的采用率最高,欧洲和美洲的采用率较低。不使用的原因因地区而异,在北美和南美,缺乏事先接触的报告最为常见,而在欧洲,缺乏同伴接受的情况更为常见。不同专业的使用情况也不尽相同,56%的整形外科医生、53%的手外科医生、40%的整形外科医生和30%的神经外科医生使用了这种手术。先前接触CC7与其使用密切相关,尽管28%的先前接触过CC7的外科医生没有实施该手术。结论CC7移植的采用存在较大的地域差异和特殊差异。实践模式似乎受到多种因素的影响,包括先前暴露、感知功效、同伴文化和当地实践模式。这些发现为CC7采用的国际差异提供了见解,并支持进一步调查其使用和不使用的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书