{"title":"Beyond stool: sampling context and inferential scope in gut mechanistic studies.","authors":"Rebecca Lewandowski","doi":"10.1128/mmbr.00212-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYHuman gut microbiome research still relies heavily on fecal sampling because stool is noninvasive, scalable, repeatable, and essential for population-level and longitudinal studies. These strengths have made stool central to human microbiome science, but fecal output is not a neutral representation of every intestinal compartment. It reflects material that has persisted through digestion, transport, microbial turnover, host absorption, and distal colonic processing. This distinction becomes important when studies move from detecting microbial associations to explaining localized activity, host-interface interaction, inducible viral states, metabolic flux, or clinical consequences. This review proposes a framework for aligning sampling context with inferential scope across five evidence domains. These include distal output detection, regional luminal measurement, host-interface measurement, linked functional response, and patient-level consequence. The framework is not intended to rank specimen types or require every study to escalate toward invasive sampling. Instead, it clarifies which claims are supported by stool, luminal sampling, mucosal or host-proximal measurements, experimental models, and clinical metadata when used alone or in combination. Prophage induction and fecal short-chain fatty acid measurements are used as examples of a broader methodological issue. Detection in feces can be highly informative, but it does not by itself localize activity, establish mechanism, or demonstrate host consequence. As gut microbiome research increasingly seeks mechanistic explanations, sampling strategy should be treated as part of inference itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":18520,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0021226"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00212-26","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SUMMARYHuman gut microbiome research still relies heavily on fecal sampling because stool is noninvasive, scalable, repeatable, and essential for population-level and longitudinal studies. These strengths have made stool central to human microbiome science, but fecal output is not a neutral representation of every intestinal compartment. It reflects material that has persisted through digestion, transport, microbial turnover, host absorption, and distal colonic processing. This distinction becomes important when studies move from detecting microbial associations to explaining localized activity, host-interface interaction, inducible viral states, metabolic flux, or clinical consequences. This review proposes a framework for aligning sampling context with inferential scope across five evidence domains. These include distal output detection, regional luminal measurement, host-interface measurement, linked functional response, and patient-level consequence. The framework is not intended to rank specimen types or require every study to escalate toward invasive sampling. Instead, it clarifies which claims are supported by stool, luminal sampling, mucosal or host-proximal measurements, experimental models, and clinical metadata when used alone or in combination. Prophage induction and fecal short-chain fatty acid measurements are used as examples of a broader methodological issue. Detection in feces can be highly informative, but it does not by itself localize activity, establish mechanism, or demonstrate host consequence. As gut microbiome research increasingly seeks mechanistic explanations, sampling strategy should be treated as part of inference itself.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (MMBR), a journal that explores the significance and interrelationships of recent discoveries in various microbiology fields, publishes review articles that help both specialists and nonspecialists understand and apply the latest findings in their own research. MMBR covers a wide range of topics in microbiology, including microbial ecology, evolution, parasitology, biotechnology, and immunology. The journal caters to scientists with diverse interests in all areas of microbial science and encompasses viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, unicellular eukaryotes, and microbial parasites. MMBR primarily publishes authoritative and critical reviews that push the boundaries of knowledge, appealing to both specialists and generalists. The journal often includes descriptive figures and tables to enhance understanding. Indexed/Abstracted in various databases such as Agricola, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Contents- Life Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Illustrata, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Summon, and Scopus, among others.