Beyond stool: sampling context and inferential scope in gut mechanistic studies.

IF 11.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-24 Epub Date: 2026-08-19 DOI:10.1128/mmbr.00212-26
Rebecca Lewandowski
{"title":"Beyond stool: sampling context and inferential scope in gut mechanistic studies.","authors":"Rebecca Lewandowski","doi":"10.1128/mmbr.00212-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYHuman gut microbiome research still relies heavily on fecal sampling because stool is noninvasive, scalable, repeatable, and essential for population-level and longitudinal studies. These strengths have made stool central to human microbiome science, but fecal output is not a neutral representation of every intestinal compartment. It reflects material that has persisted through digestion, transport, microbial turnover, host absorption, and distal colonic processing. This distinction becomes important when studies move from detecting microbial associations to explaining localized activity, host-interface interaction, inducible viral states, metabolic flux, or clinical consequences. This review proposes a framework for aligning sampling context with inferential scope across five evidence domains. These include distal output detection, regional luminal measurement, host-interface measurement, linked functional response, and patient-level consequence. The framework is not intended to rank specimen types or require every study to escalate toward invasive sampling. Instead, it clarifies which claims are supported by stool, luminal sampling, mucosal or host-proximal measurements, experimental models, and clinical metadata when used alone or in combination. Prophage induction and fecal short-chain fatty acid measurements are used as examples of a broader methodological issue. Detection in feces can be highly informative, but it does not by itself localize activity, establish mechanism, or demonstrate host consequence. As gut microbiome research increasingly seeks mechanistic explanations, sampling strategy should be treated as part of inference itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":18520,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0021226"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00212-26","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARYHuman gut microbiome research still relies heavily on fecal sampling because stool is noninvasive, scalable, repeatable, and essential for population-level and longitudinal studies. These strengths have made stool central to human microbiome science, but fecal output is not a neutral representation of every intestinal compartment. It reflects material that has persisted through digestion, transport, microbial turnover, host absorption, and distal colonic processing. This distinction becomes important when studies move from detecting microbial associations to explaining localized activity, host-interface interaction, inducible viral states, metabolic flux, or clinical consequences. This review proposes a framework for aligning sampling context with inferential scope across five evidence domains. These include distal output detection, regional luminal measurement, host-interface measurement, linked functional response, and patient-level consequence. The framework is not intended to rank specimen types or require every study to escalate toward invasive sampling. Instead, it clarifies which claims are supported by stool, luminal sampling, mucosal or host-proximal measurements, experimental models, and clinical metadata when used alone or in combination. Prophage induction and fecal short-chain fatty acid measurements are used as examples of a broader methodological issue. Detection in feces can be highly informative, but it does not by itself localize activity, establish mechanism, or demonstrate host consequence. As gut microbiome research increasingly seeks mechanistic explanations, sampling strategy should be treated as part of inference itself.

超越粪便:肠道机制研究的取样背景和推论范围。
人类肠道微生物组研究仍然严重依赖于粪便采样,因为粪便是非侵入性的、可扩展的、可重复的,并且对于人群水平和纵向研究至关重要。这些优势使粪便成为人类微生物组科学的核心,但粪便排出量并不是每个肠道隔间的中性代表。它反映了通过消化、运输、微生物周转、宿主吸收和远端结肠加工而持续存在的物质。当研究从检测微生物关联转向解释局部活性、宿主-界面相互作用、可诱导病毒状态、代谢通量或临床后果时,这种区别变得重要。这篇综述提出了一个框架,使抽样背景与五个证据领域的推断范围一致。这些包括远端输出检测、区域腔测量、宿主-界面测量、相关功能反应和患者水平的后果。该框架并不打算对标本类型进行排序,也不要求每项研究都向侵入性取样升级。相反,它澄清了单独使用或联合使用时,粪便、腔内取样、粘膜或宿主近端测量、实验模型和临床元数据支持哪些说法。前噬菌体诱导和粪便短链脂肪酸的测量被用作一个更广泛的方法学问题的例子。粪便中的检测可以提供大量信息,但它本身并不能定位活性、建立机制或证明宿主的后果。随着肠道微生物组研究越来越多地寻求机械解释,采样策略应被视为推理本身的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (MMBR), a journal that explores the significance and interrelationships of recent discoveries in various microbiology fields, publishes review articles that help both specialists and nonspecialists understand and apply the latest findings in their own research. MMBR covers a wide range of topics in microbiology, including microbial ecology, evolution, parasitology, biotechnology, and immunology. The journal caters to scientists with diverse interests in all areas of microbial science and encompasses viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, unicellular eukaryotes, and microbial parasites. MMBR primarily publishes authoritative and critical reviews that push the boundaries of knowledge, appealing to both specialists and generalists. The journal often includes descriptive figures and tables to enhance understanding. Indexed/Abstracted in various databases such as Agricola, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Contents- Life Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Illustrata, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Summon, and Scopus, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书