Suvorexant Prescription-Record Rates After a Palliative Care Pocket Manual Revision: A Single-Centre Interrupted Time Series Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Shinya Kajiura, Nobukazu Ryu, Shingo Chikaoka, Yuta Yagi, Naohiko Nakamura, Atsushi Kato, Ryuji Hayashi
{"title":"Suvorexant Prescription-Record Rates After a Palliative Care Pocket Manual Revision: A Single-Centre Interrupted Time Series Study.","authors":"Shinya Kajiura, Nobukazu Ryu, Shingo Chikaoka, Yuta Yagi, Naohiko Nakamura, Atsushi Kato, Ryuji Hayashi","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2026.2718165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine whether a palliative care pocket manual revision suggesting suvorexant for nocturnal awakening was associated with changes in suvorexant prescription-record rates. We conducted a single-center retrospective interrupted time series study at a Toyama University Hospital using weekly prescription records for suvorexant (15 mg and 20 mg tablets combined). Prescription records, not unique patients, were analyzed with segmented negative binomial regression using an offset for days per week. The manual was updated on 16 May 2025; the first post-implementation week was 19 May 2025. The primary all-hospital series included 105 wk and 3,927 records. The immediate level change was in the direction of increase but statistically uncertain (IRR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.05; <i>p</i> = 0.177), with no slope change (IRR per week 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.888). Outpatient prescription-record rates showed a modest immediate increase (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90; <i>p</i> = 0.043), whereas inpatient estimates were imprecise. Outpatient sensitivity analyses reduced statistical clarity. This local pharmacotherapy guidance revision coincided mainly with a secondary outpatient prescribing signal. Causality, clinical utility, and patient outcomes cannot be inferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2026.2718165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine whether a palliative care pocket manual revision suggesting suvorexant for nocturnal awakening was associated with changes in suvorexant prescription-record rates. We conducted a single-center retrospective interrupted time series study at a Toyama University Hospital using weekly prescription records for suvorexant (15 mg and 20 mg tablets combined). Prescription records, not unique patients, were analyzed with segmented negative binomial regression using an offset for days per week. The manual was updated on 16 May 2025; the first post-implementation week was 19 May 2025. The primary all-hospital series included 105 wk and 3,927 records. The immediate level change was in the direction of increase but statistically uncertain (IRR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.05; p = 0.177), with no slope change (IRR per week 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02; p = 0.888). Outpatient prescription-record rates showed a modest immediate increase (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90; p = 0.043), whereas inpatient estimates were imprecise. Outpatient sensitivity analyses reduced statistical clarity. This local pharmacotherapy guidance revision coincided mainly with a secondary outpatient prescribing signal. Causality, clinical utility, and patient outcomes cannot be inferred.

姑息治疗袖套手册修订后的持续处方记录率:单中心中断时间序列研究。
检查姑息治疗袖口手册修订是否提示夜间觉醒的抗药与抗药处方记录率的变化有关。我们在富山大学医院进行了一项单中心回顾性中断时间序列研究,使用了suvorexant的每周处方记录(15mg和20mg片剂合用)。处方记录,而不是唯一的患者,用分段负二项回归分析,使用每周天数的偏移量。该手册于2025年5月16日增订;第一个执行后周是2025年5月19日。主要的全医院系列包括105周和3,927条记录。即时水平变化呈上升方向,但在统计学上不确定(IRR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 ~ 2.05; p = 0.177),无斜率变化(IRR每周1.00,95% CI 0.98 ~ 1.02; p = 0.888)。门诊处方记录率显示出适度的立即增加(IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01至1.90;p = 0.043),而住院患者的估计则不精确。门诊敏感性分析降低了统计清晰度。该局部药物治疗指南修订主要与二级门诊处方信号相吻合。不能推断因果关系、临床效用和患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书