Decoding resistance: a comprehensive study on pathogens and antibiotic efficacy in periprosthetic joint infections.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Niklas Hahn, Marcus Jäger, Alexander Wegner, Tobias Ludger Schulte, André Busch
{"title":"Decoding resistance: a comprehensive study on pathogens and antibiotic efficacy in periprosthetic joint infections.","authors":"Niklas Hahn, Marcus Jäger, Alexander Wegner, Tobias Ludger Schulte, André Busch","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07165-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be a severe complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Identifying the causative pathogens and their antibiotic resistance profiles is essential for the effective eradication.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 825 antibiograms and demographic data of patients with confirmed PJIs from 2005 to 2021 were evaluated. The resistance profile evaluation focused on the antibiotics ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin, gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most prevalent pathogen (20.8%) followed by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE, 16.1%) and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus epidermidis (MSSE, 10.8%). Polymicrobial (PM) PJI (15.9%) was also high with MSSA (21.2%) as the most frequent pathogen followed by gram-negative (GN) pathogens (20.2%) and MRSE (18.3%). The overall resistance rate against ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin was 42.3% and 40%, respectively. Vancomycin showed low resistance rates of nearly 1% with higher rates in enterococci (4%). MSSA and MRSA exhibit high sensitivity rates against gentamicin (97.4% and 89.5%). Gentamicin resistance was high in staphylococcus epidermidis (43%) and particularly in MRSE (64.6%). Ciprofloxacin resistance was especially high among MRSA (81.3%) and MRSE (84.0%) isolates, whereas sensitivity was most common in GN (78.5%) and MSSE (85.0%) groups. This study reveals high rates of MRSE, SE and GN pathogens causing PJI. GN and MRSE rates were also increased in PM PJI. The high overall resistance rates against ampicillin/sulbactam raise doubts as first line empiric oral antibiotic in PJI. The nearly 20% ciprofloxacin resistant GN pathogens should be alarming due to limited choice of biofilm-penetrating antibiotics in GN PJI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13499337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07165-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be a severe complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Identifying the causative pathogens and their antibiotic resistance profiles is essential for the effective eradication.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 825 antibiograms and demographic data of patients with confirmed PJIs from 2005 to 2021 were evaluated. The resistance profile evaluation focused on the antibiotics ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin, gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin.

Results: Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most prevalent pathogen (20.8%) followed by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE, 16.1%) and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus epidermidis (MSSE, 10.8%). Polymicrobial (PM) PJI (15.9%) was also high with MSSA (21.2%) as the most frequent pathogen followed by gram-negative (GN) pathogens (20.2%) and MRSE (18.3%). The overall resistance rate against ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin was 42.3% and 40%, respectively. Vancomycin showed low resistance rates of nearly 1% with higher rates in enterococci (4%). MSSA and MRSA exhibit high sensitivity rates against gentamicin (97.4% and 89.5%). Gentamicin resistance was high in staphylococcus epidermidis (43%) and particularly in MRSE (64.6%). Ciprofloxacin resistance was especially high among MRSA (81.3%) and MRSE (84.0%) isolates, whereas sensitivity was most common in GN (78.5%) and MSSE (85.0%) groups. This study reveals high rates of MRSE, SE and GN pathogens causing PJI. GN and MRSE rates were also increased in PM PJI. The high overall resistance rates against ampicillin/sulbactam raise doubts as first line empiric oral antibiotic in PJI. The nearly 20% ciprofloxacin resistant GN pathogens should be alarming due to limited choice of biofilm-penetrating antibiotics in GN PJI.

解码耐药性:假体周围关节感染病原菌及抗生素疗效的综合研究。
背景:假体周围关节感染(PJI)仍然是全关节置换术(TJA)后的严重并发症。确定致病病原体及其抗生素耐药性对有效根除至关重要。材料与方法:本研究回顾性分析了2005年至2021年825例确诊PJIs患者的抗生素谱和人口学资料。耐药性评估主要集中在氨苄西林/舒巴坦、克林霉素、庆大霉素、万古霉素、环丙沙星和利福平。结果:以甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)为主(20.8%),其次是耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(MRSE),占16.1%)和甲氧西林敏感表皮葡萄球菌(MSSE),占10.8%。多微生物(PM) PJI也较高(15.9%),其中最常见的病原体是MSSA(21.2%),其次是革兰氏阴性(GN)病原体(20.2%)和MRSE(18.3%)。对氨苄西林/舒巴坦和克林霉素的总耐药率分别为42.3%和40%。万古霉素耐药率较低,接近1%,肠球菌耐药率较高(4%)。MSSA和MRSA对庆大霉素的敏感性较高,分别为97.4%和89.5%。表皮葡萄球菌对庆大霉素的耐药性很高(43%),尤其是MRSE(64.6%)。MRSA(81.3%)和MRSE(84.0%)对环丙沙星的耐药率最高,而GN(78.5%)和MSSE(85.0%)组对环丙沙星的敏感性最高。本研究揭示了MRSE、SE和GN致病菌引起PJI的高发生率。PM PJI的GN和MRSE率也升高。氨苄西林/舒巴坦的高总体耐药率引起了人们对其作为PJI一线经用性口服抗生素的质疑。近20%的环丙沙星耐药GN病原体应引起警惕,因为GN PJI中穿透生物膜的抗生素选择有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书