Evaluating the efficacy of disinfecting products against Bacillus subtilis spore using an optimized method.

IF 4.5 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Yoonsung Hu, Jinshan Jin, Haijing Hu, Ian F Deveau, Steven L Foley, Huizhong Chen
{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy of disinfecting products against Bacillus subtilis spore using an optimized method.","authors":"Yoonsung Hu, Jinshan Jin, Haijing Hu, Ian F Deveau, Steven L Foley, Huizhong Chen","doi":"10.1093/jimb/kuag025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty disinfectant products were evaluated for sporicidal activity using an optimized method. Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 was sporulated in Difco sporulation medium for 3 days. The spores were purified using density centrifugation and heat treatment and then prepared for sporicidal efficacy assessment. The quality of the purified spores was verified using sodium hypochlorite solutions with free chlorine concentrations of 1,500 and 5,000 ppm. The active ingredients in disinfectant products included chlorine, hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid, aldehydes, quaternary ammonium compounds, and phenols. Of the 20 products tested, 6 met the effectiveness criterion of greater than a 5 log₁₀ reduction after exposure of B. subtilis spores for the label-recommended contact time. Among the 11 products claiming sporicidal activity, 4 met the established criterion. Among the five categories of active ingredients evaluated, some chlorine-based and hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid-based products demonstrated significantly higher sporicidal activity than products in the other three categories. Overall, products that did not meet the study criteria exhibited less than a 1 log₁₀ reduction. When these underperforming sporicidal products were tested with an extended contact time of 10 min, one additional product met the effectiveness criterion. Subsequent quality assessments using freshly prepared, laboratory-made products containing identical active ingredients demonstrated improved sporicidal efficacy compared with the original test items, indicating that defects or degradation of active ingredients may have occurred in some of the tested commercial disinfectant products. One sentence summary Evaluation of 20 disinfectants against Bacillus subtilis spores using optimized methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuag025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty disinfectant products were evaluated for sporicidal activity using an optimized method. Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 was sporulated in Difco sporulation medium for 3 days. The spores were purified using density centrifugation and heat treatment and then prepared for sporicidal efficacy assessment. The quality of the purified spores was verified using sodium hypochlorite solutions with free chlorine concentrations of 1,500 and 5,000 ppm. The active ingredients in disinfectant products included chlorine, hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid, aldehydes, quaternary ammonium compounds, and phenols. Of the 20 products tested, 6 met the effectiveness criterion of greater than a 5 log₁₀ reduction after exposure of B. subtilis spores for the label-recommended contact time. Among the 11 products claiming sporicidal activity, 4 met the established criterion. Among the five categories of active ingredients evaluated, some chlorine-based and hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid-based products demonstrated significantly higher sporicidal activity than products in the other three categories. Overall, products that did not meet the study criteria exhibited less than a 1 log₁₀ reduction. When these underperforming sporicidal products were tested with an extended contact time of 10 min, one additional product met the effectiveness criterion. Subsequent quality assessments using freshly prepared, laboratory-made products containing identical active ingredients demonstrated improved sporicidal efficacy compared with the original test items, indicating that defects or degradation of active ingredients may have occurred in some of the tested commercial disinfectant products. One sentence summary Evaluation of 20 disinfectants against Bacillus subtilis spores using optimized methods.

用优化方法评价消毒产品对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的抑菌效果。
采用优化后的方法对20种消毒剂的杀孢活性进行了评价。枯草芽孢杆菌ATCC 6051在Difco产孢培养基中产孢3 d。采用密度离心和热处理纯化孢子,制备后用于杀孢效果评价。用次氯酸钠溶液(游离氯浓度分别为1500 ppm和5000 ppm)验证纯化孢子的质量。消毒剂产品的有效成分包括氯、过氧化氢/过氧乙酸、醛类、季铵类化合物和酚类。在接受测试的20种产品中,有6种产品在标签推荐的接触时间内接触枯草芽孢杆菌孢子后达到大于5 log 1 0的有效性标准。在声称有杀孢活性的11种产品中,有4种符合既定标准。在评估的五类活性成分中,一些氯基和过氧化氢/过氧乙酸基产品的杀孢活性明显高于其他三类产品。总体而言,不符合研究标准的产品的减少幅度小于1 log₁₀。当这些表现不佳的杀孢产品在延长接触时间10分钟后进行测试时,又有一种产品符合有效性标准。随后使用含有相同活性成分的新鲜制备的实验室自制产品进行的质量评估表明,与原始测试项目相比,杀孢效果有所提高,这表明在一些受测试的商业消毒剂产品中可能出现了活性成分的缺陷或降解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology is an international journal which publishes papers describing original research, short communications, and critical reviews in the fields of biotechnology, fermentation and cell culture, biocatalysis, environmental microbiology, natural products discovery and biosynthesis, marine natural products, metabolic engineering, genomics, bioinformatics, food microbiology, and other areas of applied microbiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书