Mariana Andreani, Claudia E. Frola, Liliana Guelfand, Fabiana C. Chaile, José Barletta, María J. Rolón, Mariana Erbin, Juan L. Rodriguez-Tudela
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of the VISITECT CD4 Lateral Flow Point-Of-Care Assay for Identifying Advanced HIV Disease","authors":"Mariana Andreani, Claudia E. Frola, Liliana Guelfand, Fabiana C. Chaile, José Barletta, María J. Rolón, Mariana Erbin, Juan L. Rodriguez-Tudela","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the performance and reader-dependent variability of the VISITECT CD4 lateral flow assay (LFA) as a screening tool for identifying advanced HIV disease (AHD; CD4 ≤ 200 cells/μL) during routine programmatic implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a two-phase diagnostic evaluation in Argentina, including a training phase (<i>n</i> = 100) and a validation phase (<i>n</i> = 249), for a total of 349 participants, comparing VISITECT CD4-LFA with flow cytometry. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the manufacturer-recommended cut-off. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to estimate the implicit CD4 thresholds applied by readers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The VISITECT CD4-LFA showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 94–100) in both phases. Specificity improved from 19% (95% CI 8–35) to 40% (95% CI 31–49) after training, with accuracy increasing from 42% (95% CI 33–53) to 57% (95% CI 51–63). ROC analysis demonstrated a shift in the implicit reader threshold from 363 to 270 cells/μL, indicating improved interpretation with experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The VISITECT CD4-LFA is a highly sensitive point-of-care (POC) tool for AHD screening, though its visual design limits specificity, highlighting the need for reader-independent technologies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"40 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.70340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the performance and reader-dependent variability of the VISITECT CD4 lateral flow assay (LFA) as a screening tool for identifying advanced HIV disease (AHD; CD4 ≤ 200 cells/μL) during routine programmatic implementation.
Methods
We conducted a two-phase diagnostic evaluation in Argentina, including a training phase (n = 100) and a validation phase (n = 249), for a total of 349 participants, comparing VISITECT CD4-LFA with flow cytometry. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the manufacturer-recommended cut-off. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to estimate the implicit CD4 thresholds applied by readers.
Results
The VISITECT CD4-LFA showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 94–100) in both phases. Specificity improved from 19% (95% CI 8–35) to 40% (95% CI 31–49) after training, with accuracy increasing from 42% (95% CI 33–53) to 57% (95% CI 51–63). ROC analysis demonstrated a shift in the implicit reader threshold from 363 to 270 cells/μL, indicating improved interpretation with experience.
Conclusions
The VISITECT CD4-LFA is a highly sensitive point-of-care (POC) tool for AHD screening, though its visual design limits specificity, highlighting the need for reader-independent technologies.
目的:评估VISITECT CD4侧流测定(LFA)作为常规程序实施中识别晚期HIV疾病(AHD; CD4≤200细胞/μL)的筛查工具的性能和读取器依赖性变异性。方法:我们在阿根廷进行了两阶段的诊断评估,包括一个训练阶段(n = 100)和一个验证阶段(n = 249),共有349名参与者,将VISITECT CD4-LFA与流式细胞术进行比较。使用制造商推荐的截止值评估诊断性能。灵敏度、特异性和准确性以95%置信区间(CI)计算。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来估计读者应用的隐性CD4阈值。结果:VISITECT CD4-LFA检测两期的灵敏度均为100% (95% CI 94-100)。训练后特异性从19% (95% CI 8-35)提高到40% (95% CI 31-49),准确度从42% (95% CI 33-53)提高到57% (95% CI 51-63)。ROC分析显示,隐式读取器阈值从363个细胞/μL转变为270个细胞/μL,表明经验解释得到了改善。结论:VISITECT CD4-LFA是一种高度敏感的AHD筛查工具,尽管其视觉设计限制了特异性,强调了对阅读器独立技术的需求。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.