Radiological assessment of pulmonary vascularity in congenital heart disease: standardized clinician assessment versus deep learning-based prediction.

Q2 Medicine
Nisanth Selvam, Dilip Parasu, Akshay Desale, Pranoti Toshniwal, Taniya Rachel Issac, Shine Kumar, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Shilpa Radhakrishnan, Raman Krishna Kumar
{"title":"Radiological assessment of pulmonary vascularity in congenital heart disease: standardized clinician assessment versus deep learning-based prediction.","authors":"Nisanth Selvam, Dilip Parasu, Akshay Desale, Pranoti Toshniwal, Taniya Rachel Issac, Shine Kumar, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Shilpa Radhakrishnan, Raman Krishna Kumar","doi":"10.1186/s44348-026-00084-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. We developed and validated structured criteria and a DLM to evaluate pulmonary vascularity and compared it with conventional clinical interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 400 deidentified CXRs from CHD patients with Fick-derived pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) were evaluated by three experts and three trainees in pediatric cardiology and radiology using nine prespecified criteria. A separate set of 1,088 CXRs was used to train the DLM. The clinician-interpreted CXRs were subsequently assessed by the DLM to predict the Qp:Qs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraclass correlation between Fick- and DLM-derived Qp:Qs was 0.782 (P < 0.001), with a root mean squared error of 0.395 (P < 0.001). The DLM showed a strong agreement with Fick-derived classification of pulmonary vascularity (κ = 0.770, P < 0.001; predicting Qp:Qs > 1.5: 90% specificity, 98% sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98%; predicting Qp:Qs < 0.9: 92% specificity, 95% sensitivity, AUROC 98%). For interpreting pulmonary vascularity as increased or decreased, clinician concordance was 75% and 66%, respectively, whereas DLM concordance was 88% and 98%, respectively (P = 0.03). Among the structured criteria, the number of end-on vessels demonstrated strong interobserver agreement, whereas agreement for individual peripheral vessels, the size of end-on vessels, branch pulmonary arteries with their respective bronchi, and opacity of lung fields was modest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning-based analysis of CXRs enables accurate evaluation of pulmonary vascularity and outperforms structured assessment by clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-026-00084-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of pulmonary vascularity on chest radiographs (CXRs) in congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited by subjectivity, and existing criteria lack sufficient validation. Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model (DLM) analysis may improve accuracy. We developed and validated structured criteria and a DLM to evaluate pulmonary vascularity and compared it with conventional clinical interpretation.

Methods: A total of 400 deidentified CXRs from CHD patients with Fick-derived pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) were evaluated by three experts and three trainees in pediatric cardiology and radiology using nine prespecified criteria. A separate set of 1,088 CXRs was used to train the DLM. The clinician-interpreted CXRs were subsequently assessed by the DLM to predict the Qp:Qs.

Results: Intraclass correlation between Fick- and DLM-derived Qp:Qs was 0.782 (P < 0.001), with a root mean squared error of 0.395 (P < 0.001). The DLM showed a strong agreement with Fick-derived classification of pulmonary vascularity (κ = 0.770, P < 0.001; predicting Qp:Qs > 1.5: 90% specificity, 98% sensitivity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98%; predicting Qp:Qs < 0.9: 92% specificity, 95% sensitivity, AUROC 98%). For interpreting pulmonary vascularity as increased or decreased, clinician concordance was 75% and 66%, respectively, whereas DLM concordance was 88% and 98%, respectively (P = 0.03). Among the structured criteria, the number of end-on vessels demonstrated strong interobserver agreement, whereas agreement for individual peripheral vessels, the size of end-on vessels, branch pulmonary arteries with their respective bronchi, and opacity of lung fields was modest.

Conclusion: Deep learning-based analysis of CXRs enables accurate evaluation of pulmonary vascularity and outperforms structured assessment by clinicians.

先天性心脏病肺血管的影像学评估:标准化临床医生评估与基于深度学习的预测
背景:先天性心脏病(CHD)胸片(cxr)上肺血管的评估受主观性的限制,现有标准缺乏足够的验证。基于人工智能的深度学习模型(DLM)分析可以提高准确性。我们开发并验证了结构化标准和DLM来评估肺血管性,并将其与常规临床解释进行比较。方法:由3名专家和3名儿科心脏科和放射科培训生根据9项预先设定的标准,对400例经菲克衍生的肺-全身血流比(Qp:Qs)的冠心病患者进行确定的cxr评估。另外一组1088个cxr被用来训练DLM。临床解释的cxr随后由DLM评估以预测Qp:Qs。结果:Fick和dlm衍生的Qp:Qs之间的类内相关性为0.782 (p1.5: 90%特异性,98%敏感性,受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUROC] 98%;预测Qp:Qs结论:基于深度学习的cxr分析能够准确评估肺血管性,优于临床医生的结构化评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书