Effects of Behaviour Change Interventions Combined With Exercise on Device-Measured Physical Activity in People With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jare/5852133
Rebecca M Meiring, Mitchell Campbell, Abhishta Sood, Daniel O'Brien, Estelle D Watson
{"title":"Effects of Behaviour Change Interventions Combined With Exercise on Device-Measured Physical Activity in People With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rebecca M Meiring, Mitchell Campbell, Abhishta Sood, Daniel O'Brien, Estelle D Watson","doi":"10.1155/jare/5852133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behaviour change techniques (BCTs) are recommended as core components of physical activity (PA) interventions for people with lower limb osteoarthritis (OA), and identifying effective BCTs is an emerging research priority. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of combined behaviour change and exercise interventions on objectively measured total PA (primary outcome) and other device-measured activity behaviours, including moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), steps and sedentary behaviour, in people with hip or knee OA (secondary outcomes). Five databases were searched from inception until September 2025. The titles of identified randomised controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 907) were screened by two reviewers, and 12 studies involving 1162 participants with OA were included. Study quality was assessed using the SIGN checklist, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Most studies were rated as low quality, and the certainty of evidence was low to very low across all outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses found little to no difference for the use of behaviour change and exercise interventions for our primary outcome of total PA postintervention (3 studies, <i>n</i> = 246; MD 21.25 min/day, 95% CI -26.11-68.61) or at 12-month follow-up (3 studies, <i>n</i> = 221; MD 30.52 min/day, 95% CI -25.42-86.45). A meta-analysis of four studies (<i>n</i> = 307) found a small increase in device-measured MVPA at short-term follow-up (MD 2.53 min/day, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.88; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 21%). No significant effects were observed for any of the other outcomes (long-term MVPA, steps or sedentary behaviour). The existing evidence is limited, and findings should be interpreted cautiously given the low to very low certainty of the evidence and the small number of studies available. This highlights the need for higher quality studies with clear BCT reporting and fidelity procedures to establish whether behaviour change combined with exercise improves PA behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5852133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13479105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/5852133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behaviour change techniques (BCTs) are recommended as core components of physical activity (PA) interventions for people with lower limb osteoarthritis (OA), and identifying effective BCTs is an emerging research priority. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of combined behaviour change and exercise interventions on objectively measured total PA (primary outcome) and other device-measured activity behaviours, including moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), steps and sedentary behaviour, in people with hip or knee OA (secondary outcomes). Five databases were searched from inception until September 2025. The titles of identified randomised controlled trials (n = 907) were screened by two reviewers, and 12 studies involving 1162 participants with OA were included. Study quality was assessed using the SIGN checklist, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Most studies were rated as low quality, and the certainty of evidence was low to very low across all outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses found little to no difference for the use of behaviour change and exercise interventions for our primary outcome of total PA postintervention (3 studies, n = 246; MD 21.25 min/day, 95% CI -26.11-68.61) or at 12-month follow-up (3 studies, n = 221; MD 30.52 min/day, 95% CI -25.42-86.45). A meta-analysis of four studies (n = 307) found a small increase in device-measured MVPA at short-term follow-up (MD 2.53 min/day, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.88; I 2 = 21%). No significant effects were observed for any of the other outcomes (long-term MVPA, steps or sedentary behaviour). The existing evidence is limited, and findings should be interpreted cautiously given the low to very low certainty of the evidence and the small number of studies available. This highlights the need for higher quality studies with clear BCT reporting and fidelity procedures to establish whether behaviour change combined with exercise improves PA behaviours.

行为改变干预结合运动对髋关节和膝关节骨性关节炎患者器械测量体力活动的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
行为改变技术(bct)被推荐为下肢骨关节炎(OA)患者身体活动(PA)干预的核心组成部分,确定有效的bct是一个新兴的研究重点。本系统综述旨在评估行为改变和运动干预相结合对髋关节或膝关节OA患者客观测量的总PA(主要结局)和其他设备测量的活动行为的影响,包括中度至剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)、步数和久坐行为(次要结局)。从成立到2025年9月,检索了五个数据库。两名审稿人筛选了已确定的随机对照试验(n = 907)的标题,纳入了12项研究,涉及1162名OA患者。使用SIGN检查表评估研究质量,使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。大多数研究被评为低质量,证据的确定性在所有结果中都很低到非常低。随机效应荟萃分析发现,行为改变和运动干预的使用对于干预后总PA(3项研究,n = 246; MD 21.25分钟/天,95% CI -26.11-68.61)或12个月随访(3项研究,n = 221; MD 30.52分钟/天,95% CI -25.42-86.45)的主要结局几乎没有差异。一项对4项研究(n = 307)的荟萃分析发现,在短期随访中,装置测量的MVPA有小幅增加(MD为2.53分钟/天,95% CI 0.18至4.88;i2 = 21%)。其他任何结果(长期MVPA、步数或久坐行为)均未观察到显著影响。现有的证据是有限的,鉴于证据的低到极低的确定性和现有的研究数量少,研究结果应谨慎解释。这突出了需要更高质量的研究,明确BCT报告和保真程序,以确定行为改变与运动相结合是否能改善PA行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书