War-related exposure moderates the association between attachment-related characteristics and cognitive-limbic functional connectivity in children: an fMRI study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122394
Sarit Roizman, Rola Farah, Ayelet Elor, Dror Kraus, Mika Rotman-Shapira, Noga Gal, Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus
{"title":"War-related exposure moderates the association between attachment-related characteristics and cognitive-limbic functional connectivity in children: an fMRI study.","authors":"Sarit Roizman, Rola Farah, Ayelet Elor, Dror Kraus, Mika Rotman-Shapira, Noga Gal, Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.122394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-life exposure to chronic and unpredictable stress is a major risk factor for affective disorders, yet the neurodevelopmental mechanisms linking such exposure to emotional vulnerability remain unclear. War-related environments represent an extreme form of environmental unpredictability and may shape how children's attachment-related characteristics relate to the organization of cognitive-limbic brain systems. Here we test whether war-related exposure moderates this brain-behavior association, rather than producing uniform group-level differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine children (42 war-exposed; 37 non-exposed) underwent behavioral assessment and resting-state fMRI. Executive functions (EF) were assessed via parent report, attachment-related characteristics via the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire, and war exposure via a structured exposure index. Functional connectivity analyses focused on large-scale executive-control networks and limbic circuits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The war-exposed and non-exposed groups did not differ significantly in attachment-related characteristics, and group differences in parent-reported EF were no longer significant after adjustment for scan timing and nonverbal ability. At the neural level, the two groups showed divergent patterns of association between attachment-related characteristics and limbic connectivity. Critically, attachment-related difficulties were associated with distinct connectivity patterns depending on exposure status: in the war-exposed group, greater attachment-related anxiety and avoidance were associated with reduced cingulate-amygdala connectivity, whereas in the non-exposed group the same characteristics were associated with reduced amygdala-hippocampal connectivity. For large-scale networks, the direction of the attachment-connectivity association shifted across exposure levels, from negative at lower exposure to positive at higher exposure; these within-level simple slopes did not survive correction for multiple comparisons and are interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>War-related exposure was associated with distinct patterns of association between children's attachment-related characteristics and cognitive-limbic connectivity, rather than with uniform group-level differences in attachment or connectivity. These findings provide preliminary evidence that environmental adversity may moderate brain-behavior coupling in childhood; longitudinal studies with validated exposure and symptom measures are needed to clarify causal mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122394"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early-life exposure to chronic and unpredictable stress is a major risk factor for affective disorders, yet the neurodevelopmental mechanisms linking such exposure to emotional vulnerability remain unclear. War-related environments represent an extreme form of environmental unpredictability and may shape how children's attachment-related characteristics relate to the organization of cognitive-limbic brain systems. Here we test whether war-related exposure moderates this brain-behavior association, rather than producing uniform group-level differences.

Methods: Seventy-nine children (42 war-exposed; 37 non-exposed) underwent behavioral assessment and resting-state fMRI. Executive functions (EF) were assessed via parent report, attachment-related characteristics via the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire, and war exposure via a structured exposure index. Functional connectivity analyses focused on large-scale executive-control networks and limbic circuits.

Results: The war-exposed and non-exposed groups did not differ significantly in attachment-related characteristics, and group differences in parent-reported EF were no longer significant after adjustment for scan timing and nonverbal ability. At the neural level, the two groups showed divergent patterns of association between attachment-related characteristics and limbic connectivity. Critically, attachment-related difficulties were associated with distinct connectivity patterns depending on exposure status: in the war-exposed group, greater attachment-related anxiety and avoidance were associated with reduced cingulate-amygdala connectivity, whereas in the non-exposed group the same characteristics were associated with reduced amygdala-hippocampal connectivity. For large-scale networks, the direction of the attachment-connectivity association shifted across exposure levels, from negative at lower exposure to positive at higher exposure; these within-level simple slopes did not survive correction for multiple comparisons and are interpreted with caution.

Conclusions: War-related exposure was associated with distinct patterns of association between children's attachment-related characteristics and cognitive-limbic connectivity, rather than with uniform group-level differences in attachment or connectivity. These findings provide preliminary evidence that environmental adversity may moderate brain-behavior coupling in childhood; longitudinal studies with validated exposure and symptom measures are needed to clarify causal mechanisms.

战争相关暴露调节儿童依恋相关特征和认知边缘功能连通性之间的关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
背景:早期生活暴露于慢性和不可预测的压力是情感障碍的主要危险因素,然而,将这种暴露与情感脆弱性联系起来的神经发育机制尚不清楚。与战争相关的环境代表了一种极端形式的环境不可预测性,并可能塑造儿童的依恋相关特征与认知边缘脑系统组织的关系。在这里,我们测试了战争相关的暴露是否会缓和这种大脑-行为联系,而不是产生统一的群体水平差异。方法:对79名儿童(42名战争暴露者,37名非战争暴露者)进行行为评估和静息状态功能磁共振成像。执行功能(EF)通过父母报告评估,依恋相关特征通过亲密关系体验问卷评估,战争暴露通过结构化暴露指数评估。功能连接分析侧重于大规模的执行控制网络和边缘电路。结果:战争暴露组和非战争暴露组在依恋相关特征上没有显著差异,在调整扫描时间和非语言能力后,父母报告的EF的组间差异不再显著。在神经层面上,两组人在依恋相关特征和边缘连通性之间表现出不同的关联模式。关键的是,依恋相关的困难与不同的连接模式相关,这取决于暴露状态:在战争暴露组中,更大的依恋相关的焦虑和回避与扣带-杏仁核连接减少有关,而在非暴露组中,相同的特征与杏仁核-海马连接减少有关。对于大型网络,依恋-连接关联的方向在暴露水平上发生了变化,从低暴露时的负向高暴露时的正向;这些水平内的简单斜率不能在多次比较的校正中幸存下来,因此要谨慎解释。结论:战争相关暴露与儿童依恋相关特征和认知边缘连通性之间的不同关联模式相关,而不是与依恋或连通性的统一群体水平差异相关。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明环境逆境可能会调节儿童时期的脑-行为耦合;需要经过验证的暴露和症状测量的纵向研究来阐明因果机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书