Novelty seeking and rapid symptom improvement across active and sham accelerated iTBS conditions: A pooled individual-patient data analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122406
Cecilia Chiarenza, Beatriz Araújo Cavendish, Deng Mao, Yichen Zhang, Kevin La Monica, Guo-Rong Wu, Sara De Witte, Paula Horczak, Cisse Geleyn, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Carmen Concerto, Laís Boralli Razza, Chris Baeken
{"title":"Novelty seeking and rapid symptom improvement across active and sham accelerated iTBS conditions: A pooled individual-patient data analysis.","authors":"Cecilia Chiarenza, Beatriz Araújo Cavendish, Deng Mao, Yichen Zhang, Kevin La Monica, Guo-Rong Wu, Sara De Witte, Paula Horczak, Cisse Geleyn, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Carmen Concerto, Laís Boralli Razza, Chris Baeken","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.122406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often treatment-resistant. Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), though outcomes vary. Personality traits have been examined in relation to rTMS outcomes, yet their role in aiTBS remains underexplored. This pooled individual-patient-data analysis of two randomized, sham-controlled trials examined associations between baseline Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) traits and one-week symptom change, and whether they differed by condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was targeted for 20 sessions over 4 days. Personality was assessed with the TCI, depression severity with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). TCI-symptom-change associations were examined with a robust linear mixed-effects model, adjusting for age, gender, repeated measurements, and study membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 participants were included (M/F 45/59; mean age 40.9 ± 12.7; active/sham 50/54). The model yielded a Time × Novelty Seeking interaction (β = -1.70, p = 0.021): higher baseline Novelty Seeking was associated with faster symptom reduction, without a between-arm difference. However, the interaction did not survive Holm correction across 14 trait-interaction tests (adjusted p = 0.294) and is therefore exploratory. No other interaction reached the uncorrected threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher baseline Novelty Seeking showed a nominal association with faster symptom reduction, without a difference between active and sham conditions. Because it did not survive multiplicity correction and was not reproduced in within-arm analyses, it is preliminary and may reflect contextual or nonspecific processes. Independent replication is required before temperament assessment can be clinically informative.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122406"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often treatment-resistant. Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), though outcomes vary. Personality traits have been examined in relation to rTMS outcomes, yet their role in aiTBS remains underexplored. This pooled individual-patient-data analysis of two randomized, sham-controlled trials examined associations between baseline Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) traits and one-week symptom change, and whether they differed by condition.

Methods: The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was targeted for 20 sessions over 4 days. Personality was assessed with the TCI, depression severity with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). TCI-symptom-change associations were examined with a robust linear mixed-effects model, adjusting for age, gender, repeated measurements, and study membership.

Results: 104 participants were included (M/F 45/59; mean age 40.9 ± 12.7; active/sham 50/54). The model yielded a Time × Novelty Seeking interaction (β = -1.70, p = 0.021): higher baseline Novelty Seeking was associated with faster symptom reduction, without a between-arm difference. However, the interaction did not survive Holm correction across 14 trait-interaction tests (adjusted p = 0.294) and is therefore exploratory. No other interaction reached the uncorrected threshold.

Conclusions: Higher baseline Novelty Seeking showed a nominal association with faster symptom reduction, without a difference between active and sham conditions. Because it did not survive multiplicity correction and was not reproduced in within-arm analyses, it is preliminary and may reflect contextual or nonspecific processes. Independent replication is required before temperament assessment can be clinically informative.

活跃和假性iTBS加速条件下的新奇寻求和快速症状改善:一项汇总的个体患者数据分析
简介:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)非常普遍,而且往往难以治疗。加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激(aiTBS)是治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的一种有希望的干预手段,尽管结果不同。人们已经研究了人格特质与rTMS结果的关系,但它们在aiTBS中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。这两个随机的、假对照的试验汇集了个体患者的数据分析,检查了基线气质和性格量表(TCI)特征与一周症状变化之间的关系,以及它们是否因病情而异。方法:以左背外侧前额皮质为目标,在4 天内进行20次治疗。采用TCI评估人格,采用17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS-17)评估抑郁严重程度。采用稳健的线性混合效应模型检验tci -症状改变相关性,调整年龄、性别、重复测量和研究成员。结果:纳入104名受试者(男/女45/59;平均年龄40.9 ± 12.7;活动/假活动50/54)。该模型产生了时间×新奇寻求的相互作用(β = -1.70,p = 0.021):更高的基线新奇寻求与更快的症状减轻相关,没有组间差异。然而,在14个性状相互作用测试中,相互作用没有通过Holm校正(调整p = 0.294),因此是探索性的。没有其他交互达到未校正阈值。结论:较高的基线新鲜感与更快的症状减轻有名义上的联系,在活动和假状态之间没有差异。因为它没有在多重校正中幸存下来,也没有在臂内分析中重现,所以它是初步的,可能反映了上下文或非特异性过程。在气质评估能够提供临床信息之前,需要独立的复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书