Characterizing the Relationship Between Nonmedical Use of Gabapentin and Gabapentin Prescribing Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Matthew S Ellis, Ratnesh Sharma, Kelly Ayres, Julia W Stone, Mance E Buttram
{"title":"Characterizing the Relationship Between Nonmedical Use of Gabapentin and Gabapentin Prescribing Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Matthew S Ellis, Ratnesh Sharma, Kelly Ayres, Julia W Stone, Mance E Buttram","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at elevated risk for engaging in the nonmedical use (NMU) of gabapentin. Despite the increased risk of respiratory depression from concomitant use of gabapentin and opioids, gabapentin is often prescribed in OUD treatment settings. This study examines the relationship between gabapentin prescribing histories and the initiation, patterns, and motivations of gabapentin NMU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one OUD treatment centers recruited 181 adults in 23 states reporting either past 12-month gabapentin NMU (n=150) or use only as prescribed (N=31). Cross-sectional interviews assessed demographics, substance use history/patterns, and gabapentin prescribing histories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most NMU participants had a prior prescription for gabapentin (72.1%), with 45.3% having a current prescription; 27.7% had no prescription history. Diversion of gabapentin was highly prevalent for obtaining (sharing/trading=50.0%; dealer/street purchase=44.0%) and distributing gabapentin (45.3% diverted to others). Those with gabapentin NMU had higher gabapentin, but not opioid, craving scores compared with those with use as prescribed (3.8 vs. 2.2, P<0.001). Both therapeutic (84.7%) and recreational motivations (74.7%) were widely endorsed and involved high average doses (2061 mg and 2394 mg, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathways to initiating gabapentin NMU among individuals with OUD are varied and include health care and nonhealth care channels. High rates of both recreational and therapeutic motivations may suggest the utility of gabapentin in potentiating opioid effects and mitigating gaps in unmet health care needs. Despite risks of concomitant use, many individuals had current prescriptions for gabapentin, highlighting the importance of screening, monitoring and risk counseling when considering gabapentin prescriptions in OUD populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13520482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at elevated risk for engaging in the nonmedical use (NMU) of gabapentin. Despite the increased risk of respiratory depression from concomitant use of gabapentin and opioids, gabapentin is often prescribed in OUD treatment settings. This study examines the relationship between gabapentin prescribing histories and the initiation, patterns, and motivations of gabapentin NMU.

Methods: Twenty-one OUD treatment centers recruited 181 adults in 23 states reporting either past 12-month gabapentin NMU (n=150) or use only as prescribed (N=31). Cross-sectional interviews assessed demographics, substance use history/patterns, and gabapentin prescribing histories.

Results: Most NMU participants had a prior prescription for gabapentin (72.1%), with 45.3% having a current prescription; 27.7% had no prescription history. Diversion of gabapentin was highly prevalent for obtaining (sharing/trading=50.0%; dealer/street purchase=44.0%) and distributing gabapentin (45.3% diverted to others). Those with gabapentin NMU had higher gabapentin, but not opioid, craving scores compared with those with use as prescribed (3.8 vs. 2.2, P<0.001). Both therapeutic (84.7%) and recreational motivations (74.7%) were widely endorsed and involved high average doses (2061 mg and 2394 mg, respectively).

Conclusions: Pathways to initiating gabapentin NMU among individuals with OUD are varied and include health care and nonhealth care channels. High rates of both recreational and therapeutic motivations may suggest the utility of gabapentin in potentiating opioid effects and mitigating gaps in unmet health care needs. Despite risks of concomitant use, many individuals had current prescriptions for gabapentin, highlighting the importance of screening, monitoring and risk counseling when considering gabapentin prescriptions in OUD populations.

阿片类药物使用障碍个体中加巴喷丁非医疗使用与加巴喷丁处方之间的关系特征
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者参与加巴喷丁非医疗使用(NMU)的风险较高。尽管同时使用加巴喷丁和阿片类药物会增加呼吸抑制的风险,但加巴喷丁经常在OUD治疗环境中使用。本研究探讨加巴喷丁处方史与加巴喷丁NMU的开始、模式和动机之间的关系。方法:21个OUD治疗中心在23个州招募了181名报告过去12个月加巴喷丁NMU (n=150)或仅按规定使用加巴喷丁(n= 31)的成年人。横断面访谈评估了人口统计学、药物使用史/模式和加巴喷丁处方史。结果:大多数NMU参与者既往有加巴喷丁处方(72.1%),其中45.3%有当前处方;27.7%无处方史。加巴喷丁以获取(共享/交易=50.0%,经销商/街头购买=44.0%)和分发(转送他人占45.3%)的方式转移使用最为普遍。与按规定使用加巴喷丁NMU的患者相比,使用加巴喷丁NMU的患者有更高的加巴喷丁渴望得分,但没有阿片类药物渴望得分(3.8比2.2)。结论:OUD患者启动加巴喷丁NMU的途径是多种不同的,包括医疗保健和非医疗保健渠道。娱乐和治疗动机的高比率可能表明加巴喷丁在增强阿片类药物效应和减轻未满足的卫生保健需求方面的差距方面的效用。尽管存在同时使用加巴喷丁的风险,但许多人目前都有加巴喷丁的处方,这突出了在OUD人群中考虑加巴喷丁处方时筛查、监测和风险咨询的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书