Accuracy of CBCT and dental-MRI for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single titanium implants: an in-vitro pilot study.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Katharina Hartung, Nikolai Miotk, Arne Lauer, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Mathias Nittka, Ali Özen, Ute Ludwig, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Michael Bock, Tabea Flügge, Anne-Katrin Eisenbeiss, Peter Rammelsberg, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld
{"title":"Accuracy of CBCT and dental-MRI for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single titanium implants: an in-vitro pilot study.","authors":"Katharina Hartung, Nikolai Miotk, Arne Lauer, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Mathias Nittka, Ali Özen, Ute Ludwig, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Michael Bock, Tabea Flügge, Anne-Katrin Eisenbeiss, Peter Rammelsberg, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld","doi":"10.1186/s40729-026-00709-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of optimized dental-MRI (dMRI) for detecting and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>48 titanium implants were inserted into bovine ribs. 24 implants had surrounding standardized defects (1-wall, 2-wall, 3-wall, 4-wall) in two sizes (1 mm and 3 mm), while the other 24 implants showed no peri-implant bone defects. CBCT and dMRI were performed and analyzed twice by two readers. 3 Tesla MRI was conducted using an innovative intraoral coil and a novel, T1-weighted sequence for metal artifact reduction (CS-SEMAC). Cohen's Kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed for bone defect detection, size, and type. Modality differences were evaluated using the exact McNemar test and Firth penalized-likelihood logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For bone defect detection, almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability (κ-value range: 0.958-1) was found for both imaging modalities, with high sensitivity/specificity (CBCT 100%/100%, 95% CI 0.962-1.000/0.962-1.000; MRI 98%/100%, 95% CI 0.927-0.998/0.962-1.000), confirmed by Firth regression (p = 0.22). For defect type classification, both CBCT (κ-value range: 0.884-0.913) and MRI (κ-value range: 0.794-0.942) demonstrated almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability. Overall sensitivity/ specificity were 86%/99% (95% CI 0.780-0.926 and 0.985-0.995) for CBCT and 84%/99% (95% CI 0.755-0.910 and 0.985-0.995) for dMRI, with no significant difference between modalities (Firth-adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.88, p = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under optimized ex vivo conditions, dMRI offers a promising reliability and accuracy for identifying and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants. High-resolution dMRI facilitates radiation-free, three-dimensional peri-implant tissue visualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13493749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-026-00709-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of optimized dental-MRI (dMRI) for detecting and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants.

Methods: 48 titanium implants were inserted into bovine ribs. 24 implants had surrounding standardized defects (1-wall, 2-wall, 3-wall, 4-wall) in two sizes (1 mm and 3 mm), while the other 24 implants showed no peri-implant bone defects. CBCT and dMRI were performed and analyzed twice by two readers. 3 Tesla MRI was conducted using an innovative intraoral coil and a novel, T1-weighted sequence for metal artifact reduction (CS-SEMAC). Cohen's Kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed for bone defect detection, size, and type. Modality differences were evaluated using the exact McNemar test and Firth penalized-likelihood logistic regression.

Results: For bone defect detection, almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability (κ-value range: 0.958-1) was found for both imaging modalities, with high sensitivity/specificity (CBCT 100%/100%, 95% CI 0.962-1.000/0.962-1.000; MRI 98%/100%, 95% CI 0.927-0.998/0.962-1.000), confirmed by Firth regression (p = 0.22). For defect type classification, both CBCT (κ-value range: 0.884-0.913) and MRI (κ-value range: 0.794-0.942) demonstrated almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability. Overall sensitivity/ specificity were 86%/99% (95% CI 0.780-0.926 and 0.985-0.995) for CBCT and 84%/99% (95% CI 0.755-0.910 and 0.985-0.995) for dMRI, with no significant difference between modalities (Firth-adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.88, p = 0.68).

Conclusions: Under optimized ex vivo conditions, dMRI offers a promising reliability and accuracy for identifying and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants. High-resolution dMRI facilitates radiation-free, three-dimensional peri-implant tissue visualization.

CBCT和牙科mri检测单个钛种植体种植周骨缺损的准确性:一项体外试点研究。
目的:评价优化后的牙科磁共振成像(dMRI)检测和分类单颗钛种植体周围骨缺损的可靠性和准确性。方法:将48颗钛植入牛肋内。24个种植体周围存在1、2、3、4壁两种尺寸(1 mm和3 mm)的标准化缺损,其余24个种植体周围无骨缺损。CBCT和dMRI由两名读者进行两次分析。3特斯拉MRI使用创新的口内线圈和新颖的t1加权序列进行金属伪影还原(CS-SEMAC)。评估骨缺损检测、大小和类型的Cohen’s Kappa (κ)、敏感性和特异性。使用McNemar检验和Firth惩罚似然逻辑回归评估模态差异。结果:对于骨缺损的检测,两种成像方式均具有近乎完美的内/间信度(κ值范围:0.958-1),具有较高的灵敏度/特异性(CBCT 100%/100%, 95% CI 0.962-1.000/0.962-1.000; MRI 98%/100%, 95% CI 0.927-0.998/0.962-1.000), Firth回归证实了这一点(p = 0.22)。CBCT (κ值范围:0.884-0.913)和MRI (κ值范围:0.794-0.942)对缺陷类型的分类均表现出近乎完美的内/间信度。CBCT的总体敏感性/特异性为86%/99% (95% CI 0.780-0.926和0.985-0.995),dMRI的总体敏感性/特异性为84%/99% (95% CI 0.755-0.910和0.985-0.995),两种模式之间无显著差异(firth校正OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.88, p = 0.68)。结论:在优化的离体条件下,dMRI对单个钛种植体周围骨缺损的识别和分类具有良好的可靠性和准确性。高分辨率dMRI有助于无辐射,三维种植体周围组织可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书