Katharina Hartung, Nikolai Miotk, Arne Lauer, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Mathias Nittka, Ali Özen, Ute Ludwig, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Michael Bock, Tabea Flügge, Anne-Katrin Eisenbeiss, Peter Rammelsberg, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld
{"title":"Accuracy of CBCT and dental-MRI for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single titanium implants: an in-vitro pilot study.","authors":"Katharina Hartung, Nikolai Miotk, Arne Lauer, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Mathias Nittka, Ali Özen, Ute Ludwig, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Michael Bock, Tabea Flügge, Anne-Katrin Eisenbeiss, Peter Rammelsberg, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld","doi":"10.1186/s40729-026-00709-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of optimized dental-MRI (dMRI) for detecting and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>48 titanium implants were inserted into bovine ribs. 24 implants had surrounding standardized defects (1-wall, 2-wall, 3-wall, 4-wall) in two sizes (1 mm and 3 mm), while the other 24 implants showed no peri-implant bone defects. CBCT and dMRI were performed and analyzed twice by two readers. 3 Tesla MRI was conducted using an innovative intraoral coil and a novel, T1-weighted sequence for metal artifact reduction (CS-SEMAC). Cohen's Kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed for bone defect detection, size, and type. Modality differences were evaluated using the exact McNemar test and Firth penalized-likelihood logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For bone defect detection, almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability (κ-value range: 0.958-1) was found for both imaging modalities, with high sensitivity/specificity (CBCT 100%/100%, 95% CI 0.962-1.000/0.962-1.000; MRI 98%/100%, 95% CI 0.927-0.998/0.962-1.000), confirmed by Firth regression (p = 0.22). For defect type classification, both CBCT (κ-value range: 0.884-0.913) and MRI (κ-value range: 0.794-0.942) demonstrated almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability. Overall sensitivity/ specificity were 86%/99% (95% CI 0.780-0.926 and 0.985-0.995) for CBCT and 84%/99% (95% CI 0.755-0.910 and 0.985-0.995) for dMRI, with no significant difference between modalities (Firth-adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.88, p = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under optimized ex vivo conditions, dMRI offers a promising reliability and accuracy for identifying and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants. High-resolution dMRI facilitates radiation-free, three-dimensional peri-implant tissue visualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13493749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-026-00709-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of optimized dental-MRI (dMRI) for detecting and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants.
Methods: 48 titanium implants were inserted into bovine ribs. 24 implants had surrounding standardized defects (1-wall, 2-wall, 3-wall, 4-wall) in two sizes (1 mm and 3 mm), while the other 24 implants showed no peri-implant bone defects. CBCT and dMRI were performed and analyzed twice by two readers. 3 Tesla MRI was conducted using an innovative intraoral coil and a novel, T1-weighted sequence for metal artifact reduction (CS-SEMAC). Cohen's Kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed for bone defect detection, size, and type. Modality differences were evaluated using the exact McNemar test and Firth penalized-likelihood logistic regression.
Results: For bone defect detection, almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability (κ-value range: 0.958-1) was found for both imaging modalities, with high sensitivity/specificity (CBCT 100%/100%, 95% CI 0.962-1.000/0.962-1.000; MRI 98%/100%, 95% CI 0.927-0.998/0.962-1.000), confirmed by Firth regression (p = 0.22). For defect type classification, both CBCT (κ-value range: 0.884-0.913) and MRI (κ-value range: 0.794-0.942) demonstrated almost perfect intra-/inter-rater reliability. Overall sensitivity/ specificity were 86%/99% (95% CI 0.780-0.926 and 0.985-0.995) for CBCT and 84%/99% (95% CI 0.755-0.910 and 0.985-0.995) for dMRI, with no significant difference between modalities (Firth-adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.88, p = 0.68).
Conclusions: Under optimized ex vivo conditions, dMRI offers a promising reliability and accuracy for identifying and classifying peri-implant bone defects around single titanium implants. High-resolution dMRI facilitates radiation-free, three-dimensional peri-implant tissue visualization.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.